“In Australia the practice of preferential voting tends to favor the rapprochement of points of view and the stability of the regime”

by time news

SIf the crisis ‍of‍ our representative system was aggravated, in France, by the⁤ dissolution of the⁢ National Assembly, all parliamentary democracies are today affected by a growing⁤ polarization of the ⁣political debate and ⁣an erosion ‌of the so-called “government” ​parties. . In the‍ long term, an entire ⁢model is in danger.

From this point of view we could take inspiration from the Australian example. In response to the ⁤fear of isolation and fragmentation of ‍ communitywhich permeates the Australian​ identity,there ⁢is actually,in thier electoral practice,the constant⁤ concern to favor​ the rapprochement of points of‍ view⁤ and the stability of the parliamentary‍ system.‌ Voting thus has two main characteristics: it is indeed mandatory and it is organized according to a “preference system” (preferential ⁢vote), ‍that is, the voter is asked to express⁣ his opinion on the ‍entire political offer present at⁤ each election.

Read also⁣ | Article reserved for‌ our subscribers Faced⁤ with resigning governments,the ⁢appeal for a “strengthening of the role of Parliament”

In the House of Representatives (where elections ⁤are held by majority) and in the Senate (where the vote is proportional),the electoral law‌ therefore obliges⁢ the voter to​ write down‌ all the candidates⁣ or all the parties,otherwise his vote is not valid. The voter indicates his first ⁢choice (primary ​vote or “primary vote”) then his‍ preferences, in descending order, for the other candidates or parties.

For results‌ in the House of Representatives, primary votes are ‌counted first. If no candidate obtains an absolute majority,⁣ the ‌last candidate ‍is eliminated and the preferences linked⁢ to his votes are distributed‍ to the remaining⁤ candidates.We continue in this ‍way until ‌one of the candidates obtains an absolute ⁤majority.

Positive dynamics

In the Senate, ‌the quota‍ necessary to be⁢ elected is persistent according⁣ to a calculation that takes into account ​the ⁣total number of votes and the number of seats​ to be filled. If⁤ a candidate receives ⁤more votes than the quota, he​ or ⁣she is​ elected and his or her excess votes are redistributed. If no ⁤one ⁢is elected thanks to primary voteswe eliminate the candidates who obtained the lowest scores and distribute ⁢their⁢ preferences until the quota is reached.

You may also like

Leave a Comment