The National Electoral Institute (INE) asked the Legislature to extend the elections for judges and for election day to take place in September 2025 or later.
In a letter, sent to Sergio Gutiérrez Lunapresident of the Board of Directors of the Chamber of Deputies, as well as Gerardo Fernández Noroña, president of the Senate, the councilors point out that, given the delays in the organization, they are asking to delay the elective process.
“Based on the considerations set forth in the preceding section, this Power of the Union is requested that, after analyzing what is stated here, it is determined that the electoral day of the extraordinary elective process of 2025 will not be carried out on June 1, 2025, but ninety (90) days or more, an extension that will allow this Institute to compensate for the time invested waiting for certainty of the deployment of the activities necessary for the proper development of the electoral process”, that is, in September 2025.
He INE highlights that if his proposal is approved, the elections of judges, magistrates and ministers will have “an optimal development of the Electoral Process, as the activities to be carried out can be defined, such as the printing of ballots, which is a broad organizational responsibility, since the material and electoral documentation to be printed will increase considerably and, therefore, the times for the development of this activity must be extended.”
The document, signed by the person in charge of the Executive Secretariat’s office, Claudia Edith Suárez, indicates that “it is not overlooked that, it must be considered that, for the federal election and the local election, it would be necessary to delimit, in each particular case, a geography for the mission of the independent and specific vote, considering the geographical framework that must be determined by this Institute, or as stated above, it is proposed that the electoral day of the extraordinary elective process of 2025 does not take place on December 1 June of 2025, but ninety (90) days later.”
LDAV
Related
How do citizens in Mexico typically respond to delays in the electoral process?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Electoral Expert
Time.news Editor: Good day, and welcome to Time.news! Today, we’re addressing a significant development in Mexico’s electoral landscape. We have with us Dr. Laura Martínez, a political scientist and expert on electoral processes, who will provide insights into the recent request from the National Electoral Institute (INE) regarding the postponement of upcoming elections. Dr. Martínez, thank you for joining us!
Dr. Laura Martínez: Thank you for having me. I’m glad to be here!
Editor: To start, can you give us a brief overview of the INE’s request and its implications for the electoral timeline?
Dr. Martínez: Certainly! The INE has officially asked the Legislature to postpone the elections for judges and the associated election day to September 2025 or beyond. This request was conveyed in a letter to key legislative figures, including Sergio Gutiérrez Luna and Gerardo Fernández Noroña. The INE cites delays in the organization of the electoral process as the primary reason for this postponement.
Editor: That’s quite a noteworthy request! What do you think are the main factors leading to these organizational delays?
Dr. Martínez: One key factor likely involves logistical challenges. Organizing free and fair elections requires meticulous planning—everything from ensuring the integrity of the voting process to adequate training for election officials and outreach to voters. If any of these elements face setbacks, it can jeopardize the entire electoral process, prompting a need for rescheduling.
Editor: So, this is more than just a bureaucratic delay? It really gets to the heart of ensuring a fair electoral process, doesn’t it?
Dr. Martínez: Exactly! The integrity of the electoral process is vital for maintaining public trust in democratic institutions. If the INE believes that it cannot meet the standards necessary for a credible election, then postponing may be in the best interest of democracy itself.
Editor: What happens next now that the INE has made this request? What role does the Legislature play in this situation?
Dr. Martínez: The Legislature now has the responsibility to analyze the INE’s request. They will consider the legitimacy of the reasons stated for the delay and must then vote on whether to approve the proposed timeline. This decision can have far-reaching consequences for the political landscape and may also affect public perception of the electoral system’s efficacy.
Editor: And what about the people? How do citizens generally react to such requests for postponement?
Dr. Martínez: Public reaction can vary significantly. Some may understand that delays are meant to ensure a fair and organized election, while others may view it as a sign of inefficiency or even a lack of commitment to democratic principles. It’s important for the INE and the Legislature to communicate transparently with the electorate to maintain public confidence.
Editor: Dr. Martínez, could these delays potentially impact the upcoming political climate or upcoming elections in broader terms?
Dr. Martínez: Absolutely. Delays in one election may create a ripple effect, potentially shifting political momentum, influencing party strategies, and affecting voter engagement. If parties and candidates have to recalibrate their campaigns to align with a new schedule, it could change the entire dynamic of the political landscape in the lead-up to the next elections.
Editor: Thank you for those insights, Dr. Martínez. It’s clear that this request for an extension is not just a procedural issue but one that could have substantial implications for democratic processes in Mexico. We appreciate your time and expertise today!
Dr. Martínez: Thank you for having me! It has been a pleasure discussing such an important topic.
Editor: And thank you to our viewers for tuning in! Keep an eye on Time.news for further developments on this issue and more.