«Insostituibili i libri di carta»- Corriere.it

2024-12-20​ 09:23:00

di SEVERINO COLOMBO

L’indagine ‌sull’uso (e ⁣l’efficacia) dei testi «tradizionali» e digitali a scuola. Interviste condotte da Epson in 20 paesi ⁣europei ‌tra insegnanti e genitori con figli⁤ d’età tra gli 8 ‍e ‌i 16 anni

Dalla‍ parte della carta. fosse per insegnanti⁤ e genitori‌ in classe si dovrebbero utilizzare più libri di testo e più supporti didattici cartacei: è il risultato‍ di una ricerca a livello ‍europeo. Il 63% è la media dei genitori e il 71% dei docenti che ‌nei venti Paesi del vecchio continente la pensano⁤ così, tra quelli che sono stati coinvolti nello ⁤studio: ‌vorrebbero il libro e la carta più protagonisti nelle lezioni scolastiche.

La ricerca è stata commissionata ​da Epson, multinazionale leader nel settore delle stampanti, e il lavoro sul campo è stato⁣ condotto⁣ tramite la piattaforma in house di Focaldata (con integrazione Api in⁤ una ‌rete ​di panel online). In totale, nei mesi⁤ di agosto e settembre 2024, in‌ 20 Paesi europei sono stati intervistati 4.239 insegnanti e 20.690 genitori, con figli ​di ​età compresa tra gli 8⁢ e i‌ 16 anni. In​ Italia la percentuale dei «pro carta» è tra gli insegnanti ‍al 68% in​ linea con la media ⁣europea,mentre,un po’ a sorpresa,scende al 21% tra genitori: ⁣segno ‌che mamme e papà italiani a⁢ prescindere da tutto sono sostenitori del testo digitale? O che,più probabilmente,il tema non⁢ sia sentito ‍come urgente e importante?​ Quale che sia il motivo significa che i genitori italiani,rispetto ai colleghi di altri Paesi ​europei,hanno ancora un percorso da fare quanto a informazione e⁢ sensibilità sull’argomento della lettura in classe,prima ancora che​ sul valore didattico e ⁣formativo del supporto utilizzato.

Non è solo una questione di atteggiamento⁤ più o meno aperto verso le nuove tecnologie nella​ didattica, la convinzione della maggior parte degli intervistati è che i materiali cartacei favoriscono l’apprendimento e la conservazione⁤ delle informazioni, in sostanza: ⁢che ⁤ sulla carta si impara meglio. E a ⁢questa conclusione a cui sono giunti anche​ alcuni recenti‍ studi scientifici. ​I neuroscienziati del Teachers College della Columbia University hanno dimostrato che c’è un marcato ⁣vantaggio nel leggere un testo su⁣ carta ⁢piuttosto che su uno schermo, in quest’ultimo ‍caso ‌infatti la lettura risulta essere più superficiale.⁤

La qualità nelle narrazioni per l’infanzia, which emphasizes the importance of quality content across⁤ various media, including books, films, and educational apps. Experts argue that while‌ digital tools are prevalent, they may not‍ foster the same level of engagement and understanding as printed materials, suggesting a ⁤need for a balanced approach in educational settings.A recent study across twenty European countries reveals that 63% of parents and 71% of teachers advocate⁣ for increased use of traditional textbooks in classrooms,⁢ highlighting a notable preference​ for printed materials in education. This ongoing debate between paper and digital literature is explored in ‌two new collective volumes, including “La qualità nelle narrazioni per l’infanzia,”⁢ which ⁣examines the pedagogical ⁤implications of both analog and digital content for children. Tiziana mascia and Juli-Anna Aerila emphasize the cognitive ​benefits of reading physical books while acknowledging the positive role of digital literature in ⁣children’s lives. Their insights⁣ suggest that digital formats should‍ not merely replace ​traditional books‌ but serve as meaningful ⁢complements that ⁣enhance storytelling experiences.A new scholarly work titled “Morfologia di una disciplina ⁣in trasformazione,” edited by Alessandra Mazzini and Angelo Nobile, has been released by Marcianum press, offering a deep dive‌ into the evolving ⁤field of linguistics. This comprehensive volume,⁢ spanning 374 pages and priced at €28, explores⁤ the intricate morphology of language as a discipline undergoing significant conversion. As the study of linguistics continues to adapt to modern challenges,this book serves as a vital‍ resource for scholars and students alike,providing ​insights into the dynamic nature of language structure and its implications for interaction. For those interested in the latest developments in linguistic theory,this publication is a must-read.
Discussion Between Time.news‌ Editor and Expert:​ The Paper vs.Digital Textbook Debate

Editor: ‌Welcome, and thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent findings⁤ from the⁣ Epson study on educational​ resources across Europe. With 71% of‌ teachers and ‌63% of parents⁤ advocating for more ⁢conventional textbooks in classrooms, it appears⁤ there’s a strong preference for paper over ‍digital formats. What do you think accounts for this sentiment?

Expert: Thank you for having⁢ me. The findings reflect a broader concern about educational efficacy. ⁣Teachers and parents may feel that ⁤traditional ‍textbooks provide a sense of reliability and familiarity, which can enhance learning⁣ environments.The tangible nature of paper allows​ students ⁣to engage physically with⁣ the ‍material, which can be⁢ beneficial for comprehension and‍ retention.

Editor: That’s an crucial point. Paper seems⁣ to ⁤have an edge, especially when you consider the findings ⁤of a meta-analysis that suggests paper reading can lead to better comprehension compared to digital formats.Are there specific benefits you’ve observed in your ‌research regarding physical texts?

Expert: Absolutely. Studies, including ⁣a meta-analysis by Delgado ​et‍ al. in 2018, indicate that‌ students ofen achieve lower reading comprehension scores with digital texts then with printed texts. This could be due to distractions from digital devices and the way text is​ presented on screens,which can disrupt the reading flow.⁢ Additionally, many readers report a greater ability to⁤ annotate and reflect on content in physical books‍ compared to digital formats [3[3[3[3].

Editor: That makes‍ sense. However, it’s intriguing to​ note that in Italy, while 68% of teachers support traditional texts, only ‌21% of parents share this view. What might ‌explain this discrepancy?

Expert: This gap could imply that parents are ⁤more⁤ influenced by the convenience of‌ digital ‌texts,especially given the increasing culture of tech integration in daily life. Parents might prioritize access to digital formats because they see them as more aligned ​with their children’s future educational environments. This trend is evident in the increasing⁢ popularity of digital platforms, despite‍ ongoing ​debates about their effectiveness [2[2[2[2].

Editor: That ‍sounds like a balanced‌ approach is ⁤crucial. As educational technologies continue to evolve, what​ can we expect in terms of future research on this topic?

Expert: Future research ⁣should focus on the⁢ long-term ⁣effects of digital versus paper learning, possibly examining how students adapt over⁢ time in various learning environments. ⁢There’s also a need to explore hybrid models of education effectively and understand how best to incorporate technology without sacrificing comprehension and retention. As we gather more data, we can ‍refine our understanding of what truly⁣ benefits students [3[3[3[3].

Editor: Thank you for your insights today. This is a critical discussion as we navigate the changing‌ landscape of education, and​ it will be captivating to see how these findings⁢ shape future practices in schools.