“It was a good arbitration job”

by time news

2023-07-09 16:39:00

FútbolUy. Follows on Twitter @footballportaluy

Christian Ferreyra, main referee of the match between Danubio and Peñarol held in Jardines del Hipódromo, which culminated in a 1-0 victory for the Intermedio 2023 tournament, was interviewed on the program Penalty point of Channel 10 and released the details of the controversial incidents that the meeting had.

Ferreyra gave his general point of view of the match at the judges’ level and highlighted their performance: “Personally, it was a good refereeing job, where there were many difficult plays, but we were successful. The whole team stayed focused during the game. The game was played.”

“The VAR always checks. When they detected that there was a player in an advanced position, participating in interfering with the opponent, the player’s location was reassessed. After defining the offside, it was analyzed how the player interferes. He does it in his movement to go look for the ball and have contact with the rival”, he told about the first goal disallowed to Abel Hernández and continued: “I did not spend four minutes watching the incident, but it was only thirty seconds”.

Regarding the second invalidated goal against Abel Hernández, understanding that Hernán Menosse interfered again, he stated: “From what the layout of the lines shows me, we assume that the footballer is in an advanced position. The other consideration is that he hinders the opponent and does not allow him to defend the ball. In addition, the ball was in a disputed context”.

“The devaluation of Marcelo de León was positive. He would cancel both goals again if the game was tomorrow, ”said the international judge without any doubt.

He also referred to the tool as such: “The VAR came to do justice. It is up to each one to believe if they are looking for elephants or ants”.

“There are plays in which there are arguments both to penalize the situation and not to. In the case of Abel’s goals, there were more reasons to cancel them, ”he acknowledged.

Regarding a possible hand from the Danubio defender claimed by Peñarol in the supplement, he said: “All situations are checked, especially when they are inside the area. First the local soccer player plays it, who wants to clear and the ball bounces off Cristóforo. The hand is in a natural position and the ball came from a rebound, which is why the context was not for charging a penalty. The video arbitration confirmed to me that I agreed with the decision.

“There are always things to improve. Many times the cameras do not take the plays so well. When you are the main referee and you are going to observe the situation on the screen, the lines are already drawn. I don’t know how it looks on TV, ”he analyzed.

FútbolUy. Follows on Twitter @footballportaluy

SoccerUy – Montevideo Portal


#good #arbitration #job

You may also like

Leave a Comment