An Italian court has convicted three Egyptian security officials in absentia for the 2016 kidnapping and torture of Cambridge postgraduate student Giulio Regeni. The defendants received 10-year prison sentences on Monday, concluding a decade of legal battles over the high-profile case that strained diplomatic ties between Rome and Cairo.
The ruling issued in Rome targeted three key figures within Egypt’s security apparatus: Major Magdi Sharif of the General Intelligence Service, Cairo police investigations chief Colonel Ather Kamal, and police Colonel Hisham Helmy. The court found the three men guilty of aggravated kidnapping after a trial conducted in absentia. A fourth defendant, former head of state security Major General Tarek Sabir, was acquitted of the charges, and the judge dismissed an additional accusation of conspiracy to commit aggravated murder against Sharif.
Prosecutors had sought a life sentence for Sharif and prison terms of 17 years and 6 months for the remaining three defendants. The court ultimately handed down uniform 10-year sentences, while ordering the convicted men to pay damages to both Regeni’s family and the Italian state.
Academic Research and Divergent Investigations
The case dates back to January 25, 2016, when Regeni vanished in the Egyptian capital while conducting postgraduate research for Britain’s Cambridge University. His academic work focused on independent trade unions and union activities among Cairo’s street vendors—a politically sensitive subject in the country. Nearly a week after his disappearance, his mutilated body was discovered in a ditch alongside a road. A post-mortem examination revealed extensive torture, including broken bones, cigarette burns, broken teeth, and a broken neck, with injuries indicating he had been beaten with kicks, fists, sticks and clubs
.
While Italian prosecutors maintained that Regeni fell foul of state security because of his sensitive academic focus, Egyptian authorities offered varying explanations. Initially, Egyptian and Italian prosecutors investigated the case together before their conclusions diverged sharply. Egypt argued that a criminal gang was responsible for the murder—claiming the suspects were subsequently killed in a police shootout—and alternatively suggested a car accident, a failed drug deal, or a botched robbery.
Legal Hurdles and Strained International Cooperation
Securing the verdicts required overcoming years of procedural obstacles and diplomatic friction. Rome Chief Prosecutor Francesco Lo Voi highlighted the lack of assistance from authorities abroad following the decision.
Italian authorities stated they attempted roughly 30 times through diplomatic channels to obtain the addresses of the suspects, without receiving a response. An earlier attempt to try the men in 2021 was suspended after a judge questioned whether the defendants knew they had been charged. However, Italy’s top court dismissed that decision in 2023, ruling that a foreign state’s refusal to cooperate cannot obstruct accountability for torture, thus paving the way for the trial under Italian legislation that permits prosecuting crimes committed abroad against Italian citizens.
Family Response and Unresolved Diplomatic Realities
Representatives for Regeni’s family hailed the court’s decision as a milestone for international human rights accountability. Alessandra Ballerini, the lawyer representing the family, framed the judgment as a broader achievement for democratic protections.
Ballerini added, Impunity can be defeated and democracies can place limits on arbitrary power.
During a 2018 appearance before the Italian parliament, Regeni’s mother testified that her son’s body was so severely disfigured that she recognized him solely by the tip of his nose.
Despite the convictions, extradition remains highly unlikely given the defendants’ absence and the diplomatic strain the case has placed on relations between Rome and Cairo over the past decade. While bilateral ties have gradually recovered in recent years, the family’s legal team has urged the Italian government to demand compensation payments and sever official relations, leaving the long-term diplomatic fallout of the verdict uncertain.