The Sinking Truth: How a Fabricated Memoir Captivated 1929 America
Table of Contents
In 1929, a harrowing tale of maritime disaster and survival captivated the nation, propelling a book to the top of the bestseller lists. However, the story behind “The Cradle of the Deep,” and its author, Joan Lowell, would soon unravel as a carefully constructed fabrication, raising questions about truth, fiction, and the public’s appetite for a good story.
The saga began with a heated confrontation. Sensing she was losing an argument, Lowell reportedly rushed at critic Colcord, stopping just short of physical contact. “If you weren’t so old,” she allegedly said, before returning to her seat and exclaiming, “God damn it! No one has ever called me a liar before!” According to Colcord, supporters Simon and Schuster quickly rallied to her defense, assuring her, “Never mind, Joan, we still believe in you.”
From Bestseller to Backlash
Days after the incident, “The Cradle of the Deep” achieved remarkable success. Praised as “vivid, rich, and vigorous,” the book quickly became a national phenomenon, with booksellers in places as distant as Honolulu struggling to meet demand. The launch party, held aboard the ocean liner Île de France, was attended by celebrities including Griffith and adventurer Robert Ripley, alongside prominent figures in the publishing world like editor John Farrar. Lowell herself expressed elation, writing to her publishers that she felt “as I used to feel on the ship when we were in the center of a hurricane, and the air suddenly becomes still and every heart-throb sounds like a canon.”
This evocative metaphor, however, foreshadowed the storm that was about to break. Just ten days after publication, the Herald Tribune published a review under the headline “Sea Movie,” questioning the authenticity of Lowell’s seafaring experiences. The reviewer asserted that Lowell was “far from being a real seaman” and characterized the book as an “elaborate hoax.”
Unraveling the Narrative
The review ignited a journalistic investigation that quickly exposed significant discrepancies in Lowell’s account. Reporters discovered that “Joan Lowell” was a pseudonym for Helen Joan Wagner. The central event of the book – the burning of the Minnie A. Caine at sea – was entirely fabricated; the ship was, in fact, safely docked in Oakland, California. Further investigation revealed that Lowell had attended school in Berkeley, California, throughout her middle and high school years, contradicting her claims of a life spent at sea. A neighbor confirmed she hadn’t been away for extended periods, and a classmate even produced a photograph of Lowell performing as Lady Macbeth in a school play.
Despite the mounting evidence, some elements of Lowell’s story proved to be true. Her father was indeed a ship captain, and had experienced a devastating maritime disaster in 1908 when his ship, the Star of Bengal, sank off the coast of Alaska, resulting in the deaths of over a hundred crew members. Lowell had occasionally sailed on the Minnie A. Caine as a child, and her mother had worked on board as a stewardess. A sailor named Harvey Jeans recalled Lowell’s fondness for reading and her self-appointed role as the ship’s librarian.
Defiance and Unexpected Success
The unfolding scandal became a national story. When confronted by reporters, Lowell remained defiant. “Any damn fool can be accurate—and dull,” she reportedly stated, admitting only to adding “cats… thrown in for color.” Despite the revelations, the book’s popularity continued to soar. The Book-of-the-Month Club offered full refunds, but only a few thousand subscribers took advantage of the offer. In a surprising move, Simon & Schuster reclassified “The Cradle of the Deep” as fiction, and the book promptly returned to the top of the bestseller list in its new category.
By the end of 1929, “The Cradle of the Deep” had become the third-best-selling nonfiction title of the year, earning Lowell $41,000 in royalties – equivalent to over three-quarters of a million dollars today. By 1930, she conceded that the book was “80 percent true,” maintaining that the fabricated burning of the ship was a benevolent act “to save the hide of the insurance company.”
A Precedent for Literary Deception
The controversy sparked a broader debate about the ethics of literary fabrication. The literary journal The Bookman invited Colcord to contribute to a discussion on the moral implications of Lowell’s fraud. Colcord argued that if “a literary hoax is condoned as good business… then we have fallen on evil times in American literature.” He noted that fabricated memoirs were not entirely new, citing examples like “The Memoirs of Li Hung Chang,” a ghostwritten autobiography of a Chinese general, and “Long Lance,” a first-person account of a Blackfoot warrior written by a non-Native author. However, Colcord suggested that the Lowell case represented a new level of public acceptance of deception.
The story of Joan Lowell and “The Cradle of the Deep” serves as a compelling reminder of the enduring tension between truth and storytelling, and the public’s willingness to embrace a captivating narrative, even when built on a foundation of falsehoods.
