Judge Peinado sends copies of Pedro Sánchez’s statement and says that conclusions can be drawn from his “silence”

2024-08-22 19:18:11

The case of Begoña Gómez asks the judge Juan Carlos Peinado It still runs its course. In fact, the judge himself was the last one to move a piece on this board after delivering the video of Pedro Sánchez’s statement to the accusations and the defense, the husband of the person under investigation and the president of the Government, despite a request not to do so. Furthermore, Peinado has indicated that Conclusions are drawn from Sánchez’s “silence”.

In an order, the head of the Teaching Court ordered number 41, to transfer copies to the corresponding parties in the case, of Sánchez’s statement in Moncloa on July 30. The Prosecutor’s Office was against this. However, Peinado responded strongly to this and to silence Sánchez, which is described as “legitimate” but that, “as is well known, it allows conclusions to be formed that, where appropriate, in conjunction with other elements of an objective nature, with the objective of assessing the possible agreement of the component elements, on possible indications, in an incriminating sense against a person investigated orQuite the opposite, in a sense exclusive with criminal responsibility”.

The Prosecutor’s Office requested 3 August last copies will not be delivered of the declaration to the parties because there would be a “lack of material or procedural utility.” The judge ensures that he has requested these copies “without indicating any legal precept” or specifying the reasons that could lead to such a presumption of inadmissibility. In this case, Peinado refers to the fact that Sánchez exercised his right not to declareor what the judge expressed as “the disposition offered by article 416 of the Criminal Procedure Law”, in other words “He made no show”.

Pedro Sánchez did not answer the questions asked by Judge Peinado and in this regard, the head of the Court emphasizes: “The parties have the right to have a copy of all the documents contained in the preliminary proceedings” because of” the procedural interpretation that can be done with the behavior that any of the parties involved, because of what they answer, or because of their silence.”

Pedro Sánchez did not declare

President-elect of the Government exercise your right not to testify. His role in this case is the husband of the woman who was investigated for alleged influence peddling. In addition, Sánchez has filed a complaint against Judge Peinado due to a preliminary change.

In the statement that lasted two minutes, Sánchez confirmed that his wife is the person under investigation and, therefore, that he accepted his immunity from testifying against her, as the law allows.

Complaint against Peinado

Pedro Sánchez has filed a complaint against Judge Peinado, accusing him of being destined for it.

It was filed before the Supreme Court of Justice of Madrid (TSJM) and it also includes substitute judge Carlos Valle. The Office of the State Attorney argues, in a 35-page document, that Sánchez should appear in writing in his capacity as the head of the Executive, as established by law for cases where a statement is taken from him about facts that were known about him. position. “What becomes relevant, do not let us be mistaken, is what the person under investigation did assuming that her husband is the President of the Government,” the document says.

We continued on our way whatsapp channel and don’t miss the latest news from antena3noticias.com.