Judge’s decision not to discuss reform of the Judicial Branch goes against the Constitution

by times news cr

Ricardo Monreal, coordinator of the Morena parliamentary group, warned that the Chamber of Deputies will not abide by the judge’s decision not to discuss the reform to Judiciarysince it goes against the Constitution.

He said that the qualified majority was not will submit to the jurisdiction of the court that orders it, in response to the suspensions provisional to the opinion of the reform to the Judicial Branch.

This initiative promoted by two district courts of the states of Morelos y Chiapashas for aim that the reform is not discussed or vote at the beginning of September, as planned by Morena and its allied parties.

Ricardo Monreal says that the rulings filed against the Reform of the Judicial Branch are inappropriate

Through his X profile (formerly Twitter), Ricardo Monreal assured that he is inadmissible and inappropriate any resolution of any judge or authority on the constitutional legal performance in the Chamber of Deputies.

Regarding the suspension against the reform of the Judicial Branch, he ruled that this is not only violating the principle of legality and violation of the Legislative Power, but a flagrant violation of the Constitution.

He stressed that this suspension is motivated by the “desperation of some sectors that are trying to preserve their privileges and intend to stop this historic reform for the benefit of the population.”

In this regard, Ricardo Monreal insisted that the qualified majority does not and will not submit to the jurisdiction of the court or courts that order it, because They don’t even have the authority to stop the discussion.and where appropriate, approval of the reform of the Judicial Branch.

He declared that the qualified majority will only answer to the people, since it was the people who gave them the vote and the qualified majority. “This decision to suspend, through the means of protection, acts of another power is absurd, grotesque and ignorant,” he said.

This provision to suspend, through the amparo process, acts of another power is so absurd, grotesque and ignorant that Article 61 of the Amparo Law provides that the amparo trial is inadmissible against additions or reforms to the Constitution and implies that none of the acts that lead to the achievement of such an end can be the subject of challenge; the absurdity is such that any citizen would consider it to be legal ignorance.

Ricardo Monreal

Morelos and Chiapas presented suspensions to avoid discussing the reform of the Judicial Branch

Prior to the message sent by Ricardo Monreal, Martha Eugenia Magana LopezFifth District Judge of the State of Morelos, granted a suspension so that the Chamber of Deputies cannot discuss the reform of the Judicial Branch.

This under the argument that ministerial career workers They presented a protection where they claimed that they would meet in a vulnerable situation with the approval of the reform.

Also on Saturday, journalist Arturo Ángel added that a federal court, this time based in Chiapas, granted another suspension against the reform of the Judicial Branch.

Students marched against the reform of the Judicial Branch (Graciela Lopez Herrera / Cuartoscuro)


2024-09-01 08:37:31

You may also like

Leave a Comment