opinion Julian Assange

Whether Moscow or London – freedom of the press is freedom of the press

Julian Assange combo serves gladic

Press freedom for Assange: WELT editor Mladen Gladic

Source: Dominic Lipinski/PA Wire/dpa, WELT/Martin Lengemann

You can listen to our WELT podcasts here

In order to display embedded content, your revocable consent to the transmission and processing of personal data is required, since the providers of the embedded content as third-party providers require this consent [In diesem Zusammenhang können auch Nutzungsprofile (u.a. auf Basis von Cookie-IDs) gebildet und angereichert werden, auch außerhalb des EWR]. By setting the switch to “on”, you agree to this (which can be revoked at any time). This also includes your consent to the transfer of certain personal data to third countries, including the USA, in accordance with Art. 49 (1) (a) GDPR. You can find more information about this. You can withdraw your consent at any time via the switch and via privacy at the bottom of the page.

Now it’s here, the extradition notice for the journalist Julian Assange. British Home Secretary Priti Patel now has the final say. It also decides whether what we miss in Putin’s Russia applies in the West.

Whe points out today that before Bucha, Kramatorsk and other Ukrainian places where we could still find traces of the most atrocious Russian war crimes, there were other wars, also waged by armies of NATO states, in which members of these armies committed war crimes, does not put into perspective the great suffering of the Ukrainians.

Because a war crime is a war crime. The same applies to pointing out that it is not only in Putin’s Russia, where public speaking has long been restricted, that journalists are imprisoned because they dare to name war crimes and present evidence of them. Because freedom of the press is freedom of the press.

also read

Kombo Assange - Yücel FILE PHOTO: WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange leaves Westminster Magistrates Court in London, Britain January 13, 2020. REUTERS/Simon Dawson/File Photo

opinion Ban on extradition lifted

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has not been able to move freely for almost ten years. He first went to the Ecuadorian embassy in London to seek protection from being deported to Sweden, where the rape case against him, which has since been dropped, was pending. He is currently being held in a maximum security prison near London.

The crime he is accused of is called journalism. More precisely: The publication of material that could prove war crimes by American soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is an extradition request from the USA, which wants to accuse him, among other things, of endangering secret service sources.

also read

Could not follow the negotiation: Julian Assange

Trial of Julian Assange

Assange and his supporters have now suffered a severe setback after a long legal back-and-forth. Westminster Magistrates Court has issued a formal extradition order. However, the final decision will be made by British Home Secretary Priti Patel. Assange has four weeks to appeal. A new procedure before the supreme court is possible – but it can be rejected. Then a move to the European Court of Human Rights is likely.

Anyone who points out today that public speaking has not been free in Putin’s Russia for a long time must not turn a blind eye to the fate of Julian Assange. Because freedom of the press is freedom of the press.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.