Justice once again rejects Elon Musk’s $56 billion compensation to Tesla

by time news

The ‌courts had already withdrawn this envelope in January, at the request of a shareholder, denouncing it’s ⁣assignment by a committee whose members⁢ were all‍ close to the ‌entrepreneur.

A judge in⁣ Delaware, in the eastern United States, again rejected, on Monday 2 December, a huge⁢ compensation plan⁤ of 55.8 billion dollars granted by Tesla to its ⁣boss Elon Musk, although this​ amount had been approved by the majority of shareholders​ of the⁢ car manufacturer.Judge Kathaleen McCormick had already rejected‍ this envelope in January, denouncing its assignment by a committee‌ whose members were all close to Elon‌ Musk. It had thus accepted‍ the request of ‌a shareholder of ⁤the⁢ company, who had taken legal action to obtain the annulment of this compensation.

Despite this first cancellation, the board‍ of directors chose to ​submit‍ this plan a ⁤second‍ time ⁤to the general meeting,​ with an ⁤adoption rate by shareholders⁣ of 72%.​ It had already been validated for the first time during the 2018 general Assembly. After ​this vote in June, Tesla proposed‍ “a meeting between the parties to discuss a proposal for the future”⁤ of the case,‌ specifying‍ that the⁤ lawyers of the ​shareholder at the ⁤origin of the proceeding‌ had given their consent.

“Smoky ⁣Theories”

the initial judgement “he wasn’t saying Musk shouldn’t be⁣ paid for ⁢his‌ work at Tesla”the magistrate wrote in the decision rendered Monday. “Tesla and Musk could‌ have proposed a new plan that they thought was right and allowed the court to overturn ‍only ⁢part of ‍it” of the‍ amount initially awarded, Judge McCormick continued. “Instead, they tried to‍ pass ⁣the same plan based on​ vague ‌theories about Delaware law.”the magistrate regretted.

The car manufacturer condemned this court decision⁤ in the ‌evening and announced on X that it will appeal. “Shareholders should control corporate votes, not judges” ⁣for his⁣ part, multibillionaire Elon Musk responded. The lawyer for the individual shareholder had argued that the​ decision ⁣of the general meeting was not “no legal consequences” on the procedure⁢ decided by Judge McCormick. The judge ‌also decided on Monday to⁤ award compensation of $345‌ million to‌ lawyer Gregory Varallo, at Tesla’s expense. In⁤ electronic trading after the close on‌ Wall ‌Street, Tesla ‍shares⁣ fell just over 1%.

You may also like

Leave a Comment