Justice seizes Cathy Barriga’s earnings in Onfayer

by times news cr

This, following a request made by the mayor of Maipú, Tomás Vodanovic,‍ within the framework of the investigation for fraud against the ⁣Treasury against Barriga.

The Ninth Guarantee Court of Santiago accepted the request made by ‍Mayor Tomás Vodanovic (FA) ⁢so that the ⁤profits that Cathy Barriga obtains from the sale of content are seized on the adult platform Onfayer.

The court’s resolution, released by T13, specified that “considering the merit of the⁤ background information ⁣presented, as well as the amounts involved ‍in the crimes of treasury fraud, falsification of public instruments and⁤ others, for which the accused Cathy Barriga Guerra (…) in accordance with the‍ provisions of article 109 letter c) of the Criminal Procedure Code (…) The real precautionary measure of withholding of money is decreed, on the amounts that the company Grows SpA, periodically pays to⁤ the accused Cathy Barriga Guerra, on the occasion of⁤ the sales that she makes through its Onfayer platform.

The request of the mayor of Maipú is part of the investigation by the Public Ministry that indicates that Barriga had committed fraud against the‍ Treasury for $31 billion, in addition to forgery and/or malicious use of a false ‌public instrument.

Currently, the⁣ former ‍community leader faces house arrest, so announced in mid-October that it would venture into⁢ the sale of adult content, through the Onfayer platform, ‍where it raised more than $7 million within 24 hours of its premiere.

How ‌can content creators protect themselves from⁢ legal issues related to ​their online‌ activities?

Interview between Time.news Editor and Expert on ⁢Digital Content Regulation and ⁣Ethics

Time.news Editor: ‌ Good day, and thank ‌you for joining us. Today, we have a ‌special guest, Dr. Mariana Silva, a‌ leading ⁤expert in digital content regulation and ethics. We’re here ‍to discuss a⁢ recent development involving the mayor of Maipú, Tomás Vodanovic, and the adult content creator Cathy Barriga. Dr. Silva, thank you for coming in.

Dr. Mariana Silva: Thank‌ you for ​having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss such ​a relevant and‌ intriguing topic.

Time.news Editor: To start, could you provide ⁤a brief ‌overview of what prompted ⁢the Ninth Guarantee ‌Court of Santiago to act on this case regarding Cathy Barriga?

Dr. Mariana ‍Silva: Certainly. The case centers around Mayor Tomás ​Vodanovic’s request for the courts to seize profits made ‍by Cathy Barriga from‌ her content on the adult platform Onfay. This request arises in the ⁢context of an ongoing investigation into allegations of fraud against the Treasury.‌ The mayor is concerned about the ethical implications and potential misuse of taxpayer funds, and the seizure ‍could⁢ be a way​ to recover any ​losses incurred.

Time.news Editor: That sounds significant. What does this mean for the broader implications of content creators engaging‌ in adult entertainment, especially in the context of public figures?

Dr. Mariana Silva: This ⁤case establishes ‌a precedent where public officials are ‌scrutinized for their actions outside of their official duties.‌ It raises important questions about accountability and the conduct of public figures. If⁤ a public official chooses to ​work in the‍ adult entertainment industry, ‍there may be public ⁤backlash, and legal ​proceedings like this could emerge, especially if they are alleged⁢ to have committed crimes relating to their public office.

Time.news Editor: Absolutely, the intersection of personal life and public responsibility is key here. How do you think this decision⁤ by‍ the court​ might influence⁤ other content creators,⁤ especially ⁣those on platforms like Onfay?

Dr. Mariana​ Silva: It might​ instill a ​level of caution among content ‌creators, particularly those who are public figures. They may become more aware of‌ how their ⁢online actions could potentially​ affect their offline⁢ careers and reputations. Additionally, it emphasizes the importance of transparency and ethical conduct.‌ Other creators ​may also‍ be more vigilant about the​ legal ramifications⁤ of their work and how it intersects with⁣ their public roles.

Time.news Editor: You’ve pointed out the consequences for public figures in this realm. Do ⁣you think‍ there will be any legislative changes in response to this case?

Dr. Mariana Silva: It’s possible. Cases like‌ this often prompt discussions among lawmakers ⁢about the boundaries of public and private life, as⁣ well ⁣as ethical​ guidelines for⁢ public officials. We may see calls for stricter ⁢regulations regarding ⁤the actions of elected officials, especially concerning maintaining ethical standards and ​accountability in their personal endeavors.

Time.news Editor: A fascinating perspective. how should the general public ⁣approach cases like this in‌ terms of⁤ understanding the complexities involved?

Dr. Mariana Silva: The public should recognize that the issues at play‍ are multifaceted. ‌Understanding the legal system, the responsibilities of public officials, and ‍the nature of digital economies is vital. It’s essential to approach these developments with an​ open ⁢mind and to consider the broader societal‌ implications, rather than just sensationalizing the lives ⁣of individuals involved.

Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Silva, for⁢ your insights today. It’s been an enlightening discussion, ‍giving us much to ponder regarding the legal and ethical dimensions of digital content creation.

Dr. Mariana‍ Silva: Thank you for having‍ me! It’s been a pleasure to engage with these critical issues.

Time.news Editor: And to our viewers, stay ‍tuned for more‍ updates on this ​case and⁣ other relevant⁢ news in the‌ digital‌ ethics space.

You may also like

Leave a Comment