2024-06-11 21:13:20
In 9 municipalities, JV was the second hottest selection of voters, whereas in a single – Krāslava county – JV was the third hottest selection of voters. JV gained the best help in Varakljani district, the place 35.69% of voters voted for this social gathering.
On the identical time, JV didn’t make it into the highest three of the Augšdaugava area, in addition to the cities of Daugavpils and Rēzekne.
Alternatively, the opposite social gathering that obtained probably the most help in Latvia – the Nationwide Union – ranked first in eight municipalities, second in 31 municipalities, whereas NA ranked third solely within the Higher Daugava area. NA has not made it into the highest three events of Krāslava and Ludza counties, in addition to town of Daugavpils.
NA gained the best help in Tukuma area, the place 28.54% of voters voted for it.
In the meantime, “Saskaņa” received first place within the areas of Augšdaugava and Krāslava, in addition to in Daugavpils, the place 35.81% of voters voted for “Saskaņa”. On the identical time, “Saskaņa” ranked third in Jūrmala, Rēzekne and Riga, in addition to in Olaine and Ludza districts.
Alternatively, in Rēzekne, the social gathering “Latvija first” (LPV) received first place, whereas in Ludza and Krāslava counties, in addition to in Daugavpils, LPV received second place, whereas in Rēzekne county – third.
Additionally, “Jaunā vietība” (JV) received provisionally the most important variety of votes – 1,707 or 32.23% of the votes – in accordance with the information compiled by the CVK.
6,809 Latvian residents voted overseas on this yr’s EP elections, and at present knowledge on 5,312 eligible voters have been collected. Nonetheless, the outcomes of postal voting, which was utilized by 1497 voters, will not be but obtainable.
“Progressives” received 24.01% or 1271 votes overseas, whereas 912 or 17.23% of Latvian residents overseas voted for the Nationwide Union (NA).
336 or 6.35% of voters supported “Latvia’s Improvement” (LA) overseas, and 289 or 5.46% of voters supported “United Record” (AS). In the meantime, 146 or 2.76% of Latvian residents overseas voted for “Saskaņa”, whereas 141 or 2.66% voted for “Latvia first” (LPV).
In 5 polling stations in Germany, 676 voters voted in particular person, together with 189 voters who voted for JV. 653 Latvian residents voted in Belgium – the bulk, or 189 voters, voted for JV. Alternatively, 322 Latvian residents voted in particular person in 4 polling stations within the USA, together with 163 who voted for JV.
JV additionally received the bulk within the three election precincts of Nice Britain, for which 159 out of 632 voters voted. Alternatively, within the Netherlands, the “Progressive” social gathering received the bulk, for which 172 voters out of 419 eligible Latvian residents voted.
In Ukraine, 22 out of 55 voters voted for NA.
LETA already reported {that a} whole of 6,809 Latvian residents voted overseas. Overseas, the most important variety of Latvian residents voted in particular person in Germany, the place 676 voters solid their votes in 5 polling stations. Alternatively, the preferred polling station overseas was in Brussels, the capital of Belgium – 653 voters voted on this station.
On the identical time, polling stations in India, Turkey and Azerbaijan had the least variety of voters overseas – six Latvian residents every.
1497 Latvian residents used the chance to vote by mail.
As reported, JV received the EP elections in Latvia, leaving NA in second place, and each political forces every obtained two mandates of EP deputies, in accordance with the provisional election outcomes formally revealed by the Central Election Fee.
Alternatively, “Latvia’s growth” (LA), “Apvienotais checklist” (AS), “Progresīvie”, “Saskaņa” and LPV every received one mandate of the EP within the elections.
Within the EP elections in Latvia, JV received the most important voter help – 25.07%, whereas NA ranks second with 22.08% of votes. Each of those political forces have considerably distanced themselves from their followers.
LA received 9.36% of voters’ votes, and AS – 8.18%. On the identical time, “Progressivie” received 7.42% of votes, and “Saskaņa” – 7.14%. Alternatively, LPV received 6.16% of the votes, in accordance with the preliminary election outcomes compiled by the Central Election Fee.
In the meantime, the opposite events haven’t managed to exceed the 5% threshold. “Sovereign energy” received 2.62% of voters’ votes, the Union of Greens and Farmers – 2.28%, “Apivinė Jaunlatvieši” – 2.13%, “Stability” social gathering received 1.98% of voters’ votes, “Middle Celebration” – 1 .72%, the “New Conservative Celebration” obtained 1.5% of the vote.
Alternatively, the social gathering “Tauta. Zeme. Hastetikums” obtained lower than 1% of votes, which obtained 0.58% of voter help, in addition to “Tautas varasaks”, which obtained 0.34%, and the motion “For!”, which obtained 0. 32% of the votes, in accordance with the preliminary election outcomes compiled by the Central Election Fee.
Valdis Dombrovskis and Sandra Kalniete have been elected from JV, and Roberts Zīle and Rihards Kols from NA.
LA will likely be represented within the European Parliament by Ivars Ijabs, AS – Reinis Pozņaks, “Progresīvos” – Mārtiņš Staķis, “Saskaņu” – Nils Ušakovs, and LPV – Vilis Kristopans.
The provisional election outcomes formally revealed by the Central Election Fee could change barely, because the postal voting outcomes haven’t but been counted. 1497 Latvian residents used the chance to vote by mail.
The outcomes of the elections are scheduled to be formally accepted on the Central Committee assembly inside per week.
2024-06-11 21:13:20