The diary of the American presidential campaign, Saturday 2 November, morning
Kamala Harris reported on Friday “violent rhetoric” by Donald Trump, after his death threat-like comments against Republican Liz Cheney. The Democratic candidate judged her rival “disqualified” and continued, on the contrary, to present itself as a unifier. At a meeting in the key state of Wisconsin, she and rapper Cardi B addressed the middle and working classes, promising measures that could reduce the cost of living.
Donald Trump, he was also in the “Rust Belt”, in Wisconsin as well as in Michigan, where he particularly courted Muslim voters or those of Arab origin, focusing on the anger aroused, in this usually Democratic electorate, by the Biden administration’s support for Israel in the war of Gaza. He continued his aggressive rhetoric, insulting his rival. He also bounced back from October’s poor jobs data, saying: “It’s like depression. »
Installation of wooden barricades in front of a bank in Portland, Oregon, in anticipation of demonstrations following the US presidential elections on November 1, 2024.
Republican Liz Cheney, a supporter of Kamala Harris, reacting to Donald Trump’s comments suggesting she should be put in front of the firing squad, “faced with nine gun barrels shooting at him”.
- Today’s figure: 119 million
This is the dollar amount that Elon Musk has spent so far to support Donald Trump’s campaign. The billionaire heads the American PAC group, which aims to promote voting in favor of the Republican candidate.
Donald Trump is expected this weekend in New Mexico and Virginia, two states considered favored by Democrats.
Kamala Harris it will be in Georgia and North Carolina, where the race promises to be particularly close.
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Analyst Dr. Sarah Thompson
Time.news Editor: Good morning, Dr. Thompson! Thank you for joining us today. The American presidential campaign is heating up, and it seems we’re seeing some intense rhetoric. What can you tell us about Kamala Harris’s recent comments regarding Donald Trump’s “violent rhetoric”?
Dr. Sarah Thompson: Good morning! Yes, Kamala Harris’s response to Trump’s comments illustrates a significant turning point in the campaign. By labeling Trump’s remarks about Liz Cheney as “violent rhetoric,” Harris is aiming to position herself not just as a candidate but as a moral leader. Her assertion that Trump is “disqualified” speaks volumes about how she is trying to galvanize support for a more unified approach in stark contrast to the divisive tactics we’ve seen.
Time.news Editor: And it seems she’s trying to connect with working-class Americans as well, especially with her collaboration with Cardi B. How effective do you think this strategy will be?
Dr. Sarah Thompson: Harris’s partnership with Cardi B is a clever move. Cardi B has a vast platform and resonates with many younger voters and marginalized communities. By addressing economic concerns, like the cost of living, Harris is appealing directly to voters’ immediate needs, which is particularly effective in key battleground states like Wisconsin. This could enhance her relatability and drive turnout among those demographics.
Time.news Editor: On the other side of the aisle, Donald Trump seems to be ramping up his campaign efforts in the Rust Belt, particularly trying to appeal to Muslim and Arab American voters. What are your thoughts on his strategy given the current geopolitical situation?
Dr. Sarah Thompson: Trump’s focus on courting Muslim and Arab Americans is quite strategic, especially considering the Biden administration’s position on the Israel-Gaza conflict. Many within these communities feel disillusioned, and Trump is exploiting that sentiment. However, his aggressive rhetoric could backfire; while it might energize his base, it could also alienate moderate voters who are looking for more stability and less volatility in political discourse.
Time.news Editor: It seems both candidates are tapping into significant social issues. How do you see the overall tone of this campaign affecting voter engagement moving forward?
Dr. Sarah Thompson: The tone of the campaign is incredibly polarizing, which can either stimulate voter engagement or lead to apathy. Fear-driven narratives often mobilize voters on both sides, but there’s also a risk of people feeling overwhelmed and disengaged. The candidates will have to balance their aggressive strategies with a clear and positive vision for the future if they hope to bring undecided voters back into the fold.
Time.news Editor: With the election approaching, what key issues do you believe will define the outcome in November?
Dr. Sarah Thompson: I believe the economy will be at the forefront along with social justice and national security, particularly in the context of foreign relations and domestic unity. How each candidate navigates these issues, especially amidst their passionate rhetoric, will be critical. Voters are looking for real solutions to pressing problems.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your insights today. It’s clear the stakes are high, and we all must stay informed as we move closer to the election.
Dr. Sarah Thompson: My pleasure! Every election cycle is a chance for change and engagement, and I encourage everyone to be active participants in our democracy.
