ST. KITTS AND NEVIS – Trinidad and Tobago’s Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar delivered a sharp rebuke of the Caribbean Community (Caricom) on Tuesday, accusing the regional bloc of remaining silent as the former Maduro regime in Venezuela posed threats to both her nation and Guyana. The criticism, leveled during the 50th Regular Meeting of the Conference of Heads of Government of Caricom in St. Kitts and Nevis, signals a potential shift in Trinidad and Tobago’s foreign policy and security alignment within the region. The core of Persad-Bissessar’s argument centers on what she perceives as a failure by Caricom to adequately defend its member states against external pressure, particularly from Venezuela during a period of heightened political instability.
Persad-Bissessar’s stance stems from a period of escalating tensions with Venezuela prior to the January 3rd military intervention in Caracas that led to the fall of Nicolás Maduro. During that time, Venezuela severed commercial ties with Trinidad and Tobago, disrupting energy agreements that anticipated gas exports to the island nation, which lies just 10 kilometers off the Venezuelan coast, according to reports. Persad-Bissessar herself was declared “persona non grata” by the Maduro government, a consequence of her support for a U.S. Military deployment in the Caribbean intended to pressure the regime.
“How could the Caribbean be a zone of peace when a narcodictator who imprisoned and killed thousands of civilians and members of the opposition was threatening with violence two Caricom member states?” Persad-Bissessar questioned during the Caricom meeting, as reported by Stabroek News. She specifically referenced threats made against both Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago, lamenting the perceived lack of a unified response from Caricom.
A Shift in Trinidad and Tobago’s Foreign Policy
In response to what she views as Caricom’s unreliability, Persad-Bissessar announced that Trinidad and Tobago will no longer automatically align its foreign and security policies with the regional bloc. “We cannot bind ourselves to the same political ideologies, the same foreign issues and the same security policies of the entire Caricom,” she stated. Instead, the country will chart its own course, crafting policies designed to defend its sovereignty as it sees fit. This decision marks a significant departure from Trinidad and Tobago’s traditional approach to regional cooperation.
This move comes after a period of increasing friction within Caricom, fueled by Persad-Bissessar’s strong support for a U.S. Military presence in the region and her criticism of the bloc’s silence regarding the threats from Venezuela. As Trinidad Express reported, Persad-Bissessar emphasized that Trinidad and Tobago respects the sovereign right of other Caricom members to determine their own policies, but her government will prioritize its own national interests.
Gratitude for U.S. Support and Concerns Over Criminality
Persad-Bissessar also publicly thanked U.S. President Donald Trump for what she described as a successful anti-narcotics operation in the Caribbean and Pacific. She claimed this operation, which involved the destruction of over 40 vessels, contributed to a 42% decrease in Trinidad and Tobago’s homicide rate, representing a reduction of 257 murders. Yet, it’s important to note that the legality of these U.S. Operations has been questioned, as Washington has not provided conclusive evidence linking all targeted vessels to drug trafficking.
The Prime Minister further highlighted the installation of a radar system by U.S. Marines in December, intended to combat both drug trafficking and the illicit trade of sanctioned Venezuelan crude oil. This collaboration with the United States underscores Trinidad and Tobago’s willingness to pursue security partnerships outside of the Caricom framework.
Implications for Regional Stability
Persad-Bissessar’s strong stance and decision to diverge from Caricom’s collective approach raise questions about the future of regional unity and cooperation. While she affirmed that Trinidad and Tobago remains “vested” in Caricom, her emphasis on national sovereignty suggests a willingness to act independently when perceived national interests are at stake. This could potentially lead to a more fragmented approach to regional security and foreign policy challenges.
The situation also highlights the complex geopolitical dynamics at play in the Caribbean, where external actors – particularly the United States and Venezuela – exert significant influence. The fallout from the Maduro regime’s actions and the subsequent U.S. Intervention continue to shape the region’s political landscape, forcing Caricom members to navigate competing interests and priorities.
Looking ahead, the Caricom Heads of Government will likely address Persad-Bissessar’s concerns and seek to reaffirm the bloc’s commitment to collective security and cooperation. Further discussions are expected regarding the development of a unified regional response to external threats and the strengthening of intra-regional partnerships. The next key event will be the follow-up discussions scheduled for the next Caricom Heads of Government meeting in six months, where a formal response to Trinidad and Tobago’s position is anticipated.
This is a developing story. Share your thoughts and perspectives in the comments below.
