Recently,KBS responded to a petition posted on the viewer petition bulletin board titled ‘KBS’s response to the deletion of the last Min Hee-jin interview article’,which received about 1,500 signatures.
KBS said, “First of all, I will talk about the part where the petitioner asked to no who the officials of former Representative Min are,” and added, “The freedom of reporting by media organizations must be guaranteed to perform the public function of reporting. It is indeed recognized in academia and the legal community that the freedom of reporters naturally includes the right to remain silent for reporters.Not onyl KBS but also manny other media companies comply with the right to remain silent for reporters for the sake of freedom of the press and the obligation to protect reporters. Therefore, the disclosure of reporters for the article is prohibited. “I hope you understand that this is not possible,” he explained.
He also said, “We woudl like to once again correct and explain the parts of the petition posted by the petitioner that are untrue or misleading,” and added, “The title of the petition mentions ‘Delete the last Min Hee-jin interview article,’ and this part is ‘KBS.’ “It is understood that you are claiming that ‘KBS interviewed Min Hee-jin,’ but this is not true.” “In relation to this, KBS requested a correction from the media that made an untrue statement that ‘KBS interviewed Min Hee-jin,’ and the media Is “We accepted KBS’ request for correction and revised the article,” he said. He continued, “After the video was released on YouTube, KBS additionally covered content that was different from what was previously reported, and took the decision to delete it through internal procedures in consideration of the various positions. KBS did not report any major incidents related to this issue. “We are covering and reporting in chronological order of occurrence,” he added.
On October 18,KBS responded to a petition posted on the viewer petition bulletin board titled ‘Reveal the truth about the deletion of KBS’ Min Hee-jin interview report’,saying,”First of all,among the contents of the petition posted by the petitioner,“I would like to correct this and explain,” he replied.
On September 11, New jeans, a girl group under the Hive label Adore, conducted an emergency live broadcast on YouTube. at the time, the members stated that they still had confidence in former CEO Min and demanded his return to the position of CEO. Two days later, on September 13, KBS posted and deleted an article titled “Min Hee-jin’s side ‘stopped New Genes from announcing its position’… Hive ‘I feel sorry for Min’.” Afterwards, the petitioner posted a post on the petition bulletin board at the end of September and mentioned the relevant content, saying, “When deleting an article that has already been reported, an explanation should have been provided, but the article was deleted without any explanation. Even though Min Hee-jin is an executive director, it will cause damage to the company.” “This happened after some communities pointed out that it contained content that implied a violation of duty by failing to recognize and report possible behavior,” he claimed. At the same time, he requested, “We request an appropriate response and corresponding action as to why the article was deleted.”
KBS said, “The petitioner mentions ‘Min Hee-jin interview report’ in the title of the petition. This part is understood to be claiming that ‘KBS interviewed Min Hee-jin,’ but this is not true.” It said, “KBS is not Min hee-jin, but rather Min Hee-jin.” “We interviewed an official from Min Hee-jin’s side, and requested a corrected report from the media that expressed something different from the facts. The media accepted KBS’s request for a corrected report and revised the article,” he explained.He continued,”I will explain to the petitioner that the article was deleted without any explanation,” and added,”After the video was released on YouTube,KBS reported from another official on Min Hee-jin’s side that it reported content that was different from what was previously reported.” After discussion among the reporters, it was decided to delete the existing article in consideration of the conflicting content. Considering that the positions of the officials were different, the deletion was taken in accordance with the guidelines of the KBS reporting headquarters.”
In addition, “If the petitioner mentioned the reason why the article was deleted and its relationship to some community posts, we would like to inform you that KBS’s deletion of the article has nothing to do with the community posts. KBS News will release the article in April 2024. “We are reporting the content we have covered in the chronological order of the article’s occurrence regarding this issue, which started from the beginning,” he said. ”Lastly, the part where you described KBS as a publicity channel or publicity agent for a specific person resulted from a misunderstanding on the part of some viewers or officials. KBS “we have been reporting on this issue with an open attitude to any side,” he explained.
Though,even after reading the response,the petitioner requested an explanation again,and KBS conveyed its position through a second statement.
Economy queen Reporter Kim Kyeong-eun Photo News 1
.
How does KBS ensure journalistic integrity while addressing public criticism?
Interview with KBS Media Relations Expert on the Recent Min Hee-jin Interview Controversy
Time.news Editor: Welcome, and thank you for joining us today. With about 1,500 signatures on a petition regarding KBS’s handling of the Min Hee-jin interview article, it seems that public interest is quite high. Can you give us an overview of the situation from KBS’s viewpoint?
Expert: Thank you for having me. The situation has indeed received considerable attention. In response to the petition regarding the deletion of the last min Hee-jin interview article, KBS emphasized the importance of journalistic integrity and the freedom of the press. We made it clear that the right to remain silent for reporters is a cornerstone of our media principles. This ensures that our journalists can operate without undue influence or fear of retribution.
Time.news Editor: That’s interesting. Some petitioners feel frustrated that KBS did not disclose the identities of the officials who were involved in the Min Hee-jin interview.Can you elaborate on why that information is withheld?
Expert: Certainly. The freedom of reporting encompasses the protection of sources as well. The disclosure of officials’ identities could jeopardize that principle and the safety of those involved. By maintaining this confidentiality, we uphold the integrity of the reporting process and ensure that journalists can provide honest and critical coverage without fear.
Time.news Editor: You mentioned that KBS had to correct misinformation regarding who interviewed Min Hee-jin. Can you clarify what the misunderstanding was?
Expert: Yes, the petition claimed that KBS had interviewed Min Hee-jin, which was incorrect. After reviewing the situation, KBS requested corrections from the media outlets that propagated this misinformation, and they complied.We believe that clarity is essential in maintaining trust with our viewers and readers.
Time.news Editor: What were the reasons behind the decision to delete the article after it had been published?
Expert: After the initial coverage, KBS conducted an internal review and found that additional context and details were necessary to provide a full picture of the situation.The decision to delete the article was not made lightly; it followed a thorough consideration of various viewpoints and the overall impact of the content. We strive to report chronologically and responsibly, ensuring our coverage remains accurate and fair.
Time.news Editor: KBS has emphasized a commitment to transparency and correction in its reporting.How does this incident impact your relationship with the public and other media outlets?
Expert: This incident highlights the need for continuous dialogue between media organizations and the public. While not every decision we make will please everyone, transparency in our processes is crucial. we hope that by addressing these concerns openly, we can strengthen our credibility and foster better relationships with both our audience and fellow media organizations.
Time.news Editor: It truly seems like a challenging balance to strike. What steps is KBS planning to take to prevent similar misunderstandings in the future?
Expert: Going forward, KBS is committed to reinforcing its communication strategies. We plan to enhance our fact-checking protocols and be proactive in disseminating accurate information. Additionally, we will continue engaging with our audience to clarify our reporting processes, making sure that they understand our decisions regarding content.
Time.news Editor: Thank you for sharing your insights. It’s clear that respecting journalistic integrity while addressing public concerns is essential. We appreciate your time and look forward to seeing how KBS navigates this situation moving forward.
Expert: Thank you for having me. it’s crucial for us to maintain our principles while also listening to public feedback,and we appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter.