Ketogenic Diet Beats Assumptions on Small Intestine Cancer Risk

by Grace Chen
Ketogenic Diet Shows Contrasting Effects on Intestinal Cancers

Ketogenic Diet Shows Contrasting Effects on Intestinal Cancers

A new study published in *Nature* reveals that a ketogenic diet, long associated with weight loss and metabolic benefits, may have opposing effects on cancer risk in different parts of the gastrointestinal tract. Researchers at MIT found that while the diet suppresses tumor growth in the colon, it increases the likelihood of small intestine tumors in mice genetically predisposed to intestinal cancer. This dual impact challenges assumptions about the diet’s overall health effects and underscores the complexity of diet-cancer interactions. The findings, led by Omer Yilmaz, a professor at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, highlight the need for tissue-specific evaluations of dietary interventions.

Ketogenic Diet Shows Contrasting Effects on Intestinal Cancers
Photo: ScienceAlert

Mechanism Behind Small Intestine Tumor Promotion

The study identified a metabolic pathway linking the ketogenic diet to small intestine tumor growth. Mice on the diet exhibited increased tumor development, driven by the metabolism of dietary fat through fatty acid oxidation. This process activated PPAR proteins, which stimulate intestinal stem cell proliferation. While stem cell activity is crucial for tissue repair, excessive proliferation raises cancer risk. “Having more active stem cells can lead to tumor formation,” Yilmaz explained. Unlike previous hypotheses that ketone bodies like β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) were responsible, the research found these molecules acted as “metabolic bystanders,” with tumor growth instead tied to fat metabolism. The effect mirrored outcomes in mice fed an obesogenic high-fat diet, despite the ketogenic group remaining lean.

Colon Cancer Suppression Linked to Dietary Fat Metabolism

In contrast to its impact on the small intestine, the ketogenic diet suppressed colon tumor development in the same mice. This aligns with earlier research suggesting ketone bodies may protect against colorectal cancer. However, the MIT team found that this protective effect also stemmed from dietary fat metabolism, not ketones themselves. The study challenges the assumption that ketone bodies are the primary drivers of the diet’s health benefits. “Our findings show that in this model, it’s the high dietary fat content, not ketone bodies, that drives these effects,” said Jessica Shay, a co-first author. The colon’s response highlights the tissue-specific nature of diet-related cancer risks, complicating efforts to generalize outcomes across the digestive tract.

The True Ketogenic Diet 👉

Challenging Previous Theories on Ketone Bodies

The study overturns a prevailing theory that ketone bodies like BHB are central to the ketogenic diet’s anti-cancer properties. Earlier research, including a 2022 *Nature* study, suggested BHB could slow colorectal cancer progression. However, the MIT team found no direct link between ketone production and tumor suppression in the colon. Instead, both protective and harmful effects were tied to how cells processed dietary fat. “Diet and metabolism are often discussed together, but they’re not always the same thing,” Shay noted. The results emphasize the importance of distinguishing between the ketogenic diet as a whole and isolated ketone supplements, which may have different biological impacts.

Challenging Previous Theories on Ketone Bodies
Photo: MIT News

Implications for Public Health and Future Research

The findings have significant implications for individuals adopting ketogenic diets, particularly those with genetic predispositions to intestinal cancers. While the diet’s effects on the colon remain promising, its potential risks in the small intestine necessitate further investigation. The study also raises questions about the role of dietary fat in cancer development, independent of ketone production. Yilmaz and his team plan to explore why the same diet yields opposite outcomes in adjacent gut regions. “The deeper question is why the same diet has opposite consequences in two adjacent parts of the gut,” said co-author Fangtao Chi. Until more research is conducted, the study underscores the importance of personalized dietary strategies and caution in extrapolating preclinical findings to human health.

Find more reporting in our Health section.

You may also like