National Power: “Many political forces have chosen one side for the ‘special prosecutor’… “We need to reach an agreement,” protested.
Democratic Party: “Give the ruling party in power the right to recommend a special prosecutor?… “Violation of the Conflict of Interest Prevention Act”
The Special Prosecutor Kim Kun-hee Act passed the Bill Review Subcommittee of the Legislation and Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly led by the opposition party on the 5th. The ruling party, the People Power Party, protested by voting against it, but was unable to overcome its numerical inferiority.
This morning, the 1st Subcommittee of Bill Review of the Legislative and Judiciary Committee of the National Assembly, led by opposition parties such as the Democratic Party of Korea, passed the Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act (a bill regarding the appointment of a special prosecutor to uncover the truth about the stock price manipulation case of President Yoon Seok-yeol’s spouse, Kim Kun-hee).
The Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act, proposed by the Democratic Party on the 17th of last month, includes the investigation target of the Special Prosecutor Act, which has been abolished twice, including ‘the suspicion that Mrs. Kim engaged in election fraud, such as illegal public opinion polls, during the 20th presidential election and primary process through Myung Tae-gyun.’ The key is to add . The opposition party, including the Democratic Party, plans to process the Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act, which was passed on this day, at the plenary session of the National Assembly on the 14th after passing the plenary session of the Legislative and Judiciary Committee.
Before voting on the bill, subcommittee members of the People Power Party protested, questioning the unfairness of the Special Prosecutor Kim Kun-hee Act.
People Power Party lawmaker Joo Jin-woo said in his remarks prior to deliberation of the bill, “If the majority of political forces exclude the minority political forces from choosing a special prosecutor or unilaterally select a special prosecutor, agreement between the ruling and opposition parties (to process the bill) is important. “He said.
People Power Party lawmaker Yoo Sang-beom said, “(The Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act) is a bill that has already been requested for reconsideration twice,” and added, “This is an issue on which both parties have a clear political position. “If we continue to discuss this, it will be difficult to properly discuss other bills, so let’s leave (the review order) behind,” he said.
However, Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Seung-won, chairman of the subcommittee, said, “This is an issue of great national interest. He dismissed it, saying, “We need to discuss it quickly.”
Democratic Party lawmaker Jeon Hyun-hee said, “(If the right to recommend special prosecutor candidates is given to the ruling party), it is the same as saying that the president will choose the prosecutor who will investigate him and his spouse.” He argued, “Nominating, recommending, and appointing a special prosecutor for National Defense is unconstitutional and contrary to the Public Official Conflict of Interest Prevention Act.”
[서울=뉴시스]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
It seems you’re sharing content related to the political situation in South Korea, specifically regarding the passage of the Kim Kun-hee Special Prosecutor Act by the National Assembly’s Bill Review Subcommittee. The act aims to investigate claims surrounding stock price manipulation and related matters involving First Lady Kim Kun-hee.
To summarize:
– The Special Prosecutor Act targets allegations against Kim Kun-hee, including accusations of election fraud during the presidential campaign.
- The opposition party, the Democratic Party of Korea, succeeded in passing the bill, leading to protests from the ruling People Power Party.
– The proposed act has faced scrutiny and calls for reconsideration due to its political implications.
– Key figures from both parties expressed their concerns, emphasizing the need for fair practices in appointing a special prosecutor.
If you have any specific questions or need clarification about this event or its implications, feel free to ask!