LOS ANGELES, February 29, 2024 – A legal battle between the City of Los Angeles and the Coalition for Responsible Equitable Growth (CRED) is now costing taxpayers $7.5 million, and Councilmember John Carter is considering holding parties involved in contempt of court. That’s the headline as the city grapples with escalating legal fees in a dispute over development projects.
Alliance Dispute Costs LA Millions as Carter considers Sanctions
Table of Contents
The ongoing legal clash with CRED has already amassed a hefty bill, raising questions about the city’s legal strategy and the future of development in Los Angeles.
- The legal fees related to the dispute with CRED have reached $7.5 million as of February 29, 2024.
- Councilmember John Carter is weighing contempt of court charges against parties he believes are obstructing the legal process.
- The case centers around challenges to development projects approved by the city, with CRED alleging violations of environmental regulations and community planning guidelines.
The dispute revolves around several large-scale development projects approved by the city, which CRED argues failed to adequately address environmental concerns and community input. The city attorney’s office defends the projects, asserting they underwent thorough review and comply with all applicable laws.
Carter Considers contempt charges
councilmember John Carter, a vocal advocate for responsible development, is now considering seeking contempt of court charges against individuals or entities he believes are intentionally delaying the legal process. While specific targets haven’t been named, Carter suggested that parties engaging in “frivolous legal maneuvers” could face sanctions. “We cannot allow this case to drag on indefinitely,” Carter said during a recent city council meeting.
CRED’s Perspective
CRED maintains that its lawsuits are legitimate efforts to ensure that development projects comply with environmental regulations and community planning guidelines. The association argues that the city has consistently prioritized developer interests over the needs of local residents and the environment. “We are committed to holding the city accountable for its actions and protecting the quality of life in our communities,” a CRED spokesperson stated.
The city attorney’s office has countered that the challenged projects underwent thorough environmental review and comply with all applicable laws. They accuse CRED of using litigation as a tactic to obstruct development and delay much-needed housing and economic opportunities.
The case is ongoing, and a resolution is not expected in the immediate future. The escalating legal costs and the possibility of contempt charges underscore the high stakes involved in this dispute, which could have meaningful implications for the future of development in Los Angeles.
What’s next for this costly legal battle? The city and CRED are expected to continue litigating the case in court, with further hearings and potential appeals anticipated. The outcome will likely shape the city’s approach to development and its relationship with community groups for years to come.
Share your thoughts on the city’s legal expenses and the future of development in Los Angeles in the comments below.
