BOSTON, 2026-01-31 21:39:00
Robot Vacuum’s Performance Hindered by Limited Obstacle Detection
A recent test revealed that while this robot vacuum largely navigates spaces effectively, its obstacle avoidance and cleaning along edges require improvement.
- The robot vacuum successfully cleaned most areas, but struggled with tight spaces.
- A significant safety distance from furniture resulted in uncleaned strips along baseboards.
- The device’s slower speed contributed to longer cleaning times compared to competitors.
- The lack of a camera, while appealing to some for privacy, limited its obstacle detection capabilities.
The robot vacuum generally managed to reach all areas during testing, but its ability to navigate narrow spaces proved unreliable. It also maintained a considerable distance from furniture, leaving a noticeable uncleaned strip along edges, skirting boards, and similar areas. This issue was compounded by the mop attachment’s inability to extend, further hindering edge cleaning.
What makes a robot vacuum truly efficient? It’s not just about reaching every spot, but doing so quickly and thoroughly. This particular model operates with a deliberate slowness, which ultimately extended the overall cleaning time compared to many—and often more expensive—rivals. During the test period, the robot once failed to locate its charging station, even though the station’s placement wasn’t overly restrictive, and requested assistance.
The robot’s obstacle detection system is notably streamlined. The manufacturer opted to forgo a camera—a decision likely to resonate with users concerned about data protection—but this choice significantly limits its practical capabilities. The 190-degree obstacle sensor on the front proved insufficient for comprehensive obstacle avoidance.
