ONE System |
Muhammad Abu Fani and Gabi Kanikovsky (Radad Jabara)
The last game between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Maccabi Haifa in Bloomfield was particularly tense, and not just on the field. On the field, the champion scored a dramatic equalizer in the 93rd minute from an excellent free kick by Chiron Sherry, but even in the stands it was not quiet. Today (Monday), after the Yellows were on trial following the crowd’s calls to Muhammad Abu Fani and throwing objects onto the lawn, the court’s decision was made.
Regarding the connection between the Greens, the trophy holder won when it was stated in the verdict: Terrorist ‘(who would prosecute the accused on charges of’ racist chants’). “The call ‘Abu Fani from the sheep’ ‘is undoubtedly sickening, but it is very doubtful whether it has any connection to the object of the call to the Arab sector or to the sector entitled to any protection.”
It was also written about the yellow crowd’s calls against the team from the Carmel: “Doubts in this matter were strengthened with us, when we were presented with examples from the distant and recent past (including videos) of similar calls to Jewish players. In this regard, the accuser must convince us not only that the readings were read (there is no doubt about it), but also that we were indeed dealing with one of the categories of readings that the Supreme Court in the Danny Amos case found to amount to a disciplinary offense. From the charge for doing so. ”At the same time, the Yellows were punished for throwing the objects onto the lawn by the team and received a fine of NIS 5,000.
More Nir Reshef He claimed in connection with the Abu Fani issue: “I was debating whether to file a complaint here regarding racism and in the end I decided not to. It is an unusually ugly expression. Regarding the court’s question, this is a statement that shames the actor. It does not encourage violence, but it is degrading. Gender category – because it belongs to a particular sector. Regarding the matter of the clock – this is a decision of the court, we stated that these are broadcasting rights and administration. “
