The end of the Swedish soap opera for Kylian Mbappé. The Blues captain sees the threat of a court summons vanish in Sweden this Thursday 12 December, following the Swedish courts’ decision to close the investigation revealed by the local press.
The Swedish prosecutor’s office opened a rape investigation on October 15 for acts committed in a hotel in central Stockholm without ever mentioning the name of the suspect, but the Swedish press claimed that the Real star was in the crosshairs.
“The evidence collected during the investigation is not, in itself, sufficient to continue the investigation, taking into account the fact that the appellant no longer wishes to cooperate with the investigation,” it indicated in its classification decision without further action consulted by According to AFP the prosecutor in charge of the case, Marina Chirakova. The Prosecutor’s Office had previously explained the reasons for closing the investigations.
“My conclusion, based on what has emerged in the case, is that the new elements, including the questioning of the person (ed: targeted in the investigation), will not change the state evidence at this stage,” he told AFP.Without naming the French captain, he specifies that the person targeted by the investigation “was not informed of a suspected crime”.
“A large number of interrogations” carried out during this investigation
“We conducted a large number of interrogations as part of the investigation,” he further explained to AFP, and “there were othre types of evidence, besides interrogations, in this matter.” The events the court is investigating took place on Thursday 10 October in a luxury hotel in Stockholm, the Bank Hotel, where Mbappé and his entourage were staying, according to the Swedish tabloids Aftonbladet and Expressen.
According to the press, the French attacker had been considered “reasonably suspicious” in the preliminary investigations, the lowest level of suspicion required by Swedish law. According to Aftonbladet, a complaint was filed on Saturday, October 12 after the alleged victim received medical treatment.
In an interview with Clique broadcast on Sunday on canal +, the star spoke of his surprise at this story. “I was surprised. I’m always surprised by the way. (…) I received nothing,no summons. I read the same things as everyone else. The Swedish government said nothing. I’m not worried,” he replied, adding that he had “no idea” of the complainant’s identity. Contacted this Thursday morning by “Le Parisien”, the latter’s lawyer, Me petra Eklund, did not want to comment on the situation.
What were the main factors that led to the closure of the Kylian Mbappé investigation?
Interview with Expert Legal Analyst on the closure of the Kylian Mbappé Investigation
Editor, Time.news: thank you for joining us today. We’re here to discuss the recent developments regarding Kylian Mbappé and the closure of the rape investigation in Sweden. Can you start by summarizing what led to this investigation?
Expert: Certainly! The investigation began on October 15 after allegations surfaced concerning a potential incident that took place at a luxury hotel in Stockholm. While the Swedish prosecutorS office did not disclose the name of the suspect initially, local media reported that Mbappé was the individual in question. This high-profile case attracted significant media attention due to his status as a captain of the French national team and a star for Real Madrid.
Editor: What prompted the Swedish courts to close the investigation recently?
Expert: The court’s decision was primarily based on the findings that the evidence collected was deemed insufficient to warrant further investigation. In their classification decision, the prosecutor indicated that the complainant no longer wished to cooperate. This lack of cooperation can be critical in such cases, as the prosecution needs the victim’s assistance to build a strong case.
Editor: The prosecutor, Marina chirakova, mentioned carrying out a “large number of interrogations.” How significant is this in the context of legal investigations?
Expert: Interrogations play a crucial role in gathering information and assessing the credibility of the involved parties. The thoroughness of the investigation—having conducted numerous interrogations alongside other forms of evidence—demonstrates the prosecutor’s commitment to uncovering the truth. However, the absence of corroborative evidence ultimately influenced the decision to close the case.
Editor: There was some mention of Mbappé being “reasonably suspicious.” How dose this classification work within Swedish law?
Expert: In Swedish law, being “reasonably suspicious” is a preliminary classification that indicates a lower level of suspicion, meaning there isn’t enough evidence to pursue formal charges at that stage.It reflects that while there may have been some basis for concern, the legal threshold for prosecution was not met.
Editor: During the investigation, did Mbappé respond publicly to the accusations?
Expert: Yes, Mbappé expressed his surprise regarding the allegations, stating that he learned about them through the media rather than receiving any formal notification. His immediate concern appears to have been about the lack of interaction from legal authorities, which is understandable given the gravity of such accusations.
Editor: Assuming the closure of the case, what are the potential implications for Mbappé moving forward?
Expert: The closure of the case allows Mbappé to continue his career without the cloud of these accusations looming over him; though, the media attention and public speculation can linger. It’s crucial for public figures to manage their image carefully during and after such incidents.Practically,it’s advisable for them to engage with legal counsel to navigate any potential reputational risks.
Editor: what practical advice would you give to individuals in similar situations—weather they’re public figures or not?
expert: Individuals facing similar allegations should seek legal representation immediately. It’s significant to understand one’s rights and how to respond to any accusations effectively. Moreover, maintaining open lines of communication with legal counsel and avoiding public statements without their guidance can definitely help mitigate risks.Lastly, it’s crucial to prioritize mental health and seek support from professionals during such challenging times.
editor: Thank you for your insights today. This has been incredibly informative, and we appreciate your time.
Expert: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss such significant matters.
