The federal representative Laura Ballesteros (MC) reported that they obtained a provisional suspension against the reform of the Judicial Branch being implemented in the 32 entities of the country.
Through a message on her “X” account, the legislator explained that with this resolution no local congress should reform its Constitution to imitate the judicial reform and no local judge or magistrate may be dismissed.
You might be interested in: Morena presents an initiative that would prevent SCJN from ruling on constitutional reforms
He recalled that last week MC legislators presented several protections against the reform of the Judiciary with which they seek to combat dozens of irregularities in the legislative process of this modification to the Constitution.
He considered that the most serious irregularities were that Morena, “in the attempt to impose his steamroller without listening to his supporters, made illegal votes in the @Mx_Diputados and in the @senadomexicano.”
“In the Chamber of Deputiesfirst they prevented us from accessing several opposition legislators. When we managed to enter, although several colleagues requested that the quorum be verified because there were a lack of deputies (in their place, there were drivers, advisors and other people), it was never verified that there were enough deputies to meet,” he also explained in “X.”
In the Senate, he continued, it was even more serious, since one senator was deprived of his freedom, one more was doused with gasoline and others were extorted.
You might be interested: Reforms to the Constitution since 2018 have made the country fairer, says Sheinbaum
Clearly there were no conditions for meeting: it was not even guaranteed that senators would vote freely. Despite that, they imposed the vote, he claimed.
“In addition to the irregularities in the process, the #JudicialReform destroys, de facto, the division of powersby allowing the Judiciary to be captured by Morena.
“A reform like this is completely unconstitutional. The #Constitution cannot be reformed to self-destruct. Just as a reform that establishes a monarchy in Mexico would be unconstitutional, a reform that destroys the division of powers, which is the main mechanism to stop authoritarianism and abuse of power by the Executive, is also unconstitutional,” Ballesteros noted online. social.
You might be interested in: PVEM proposes that all illicit activity in electronic media be a threat to national security
These arguments and others, he pointed out, convinced a Court in the State of Queretaro to suspend a part of the judicial reform: the eighth transitional article, which establishes that the Judicial Reform of the Federal Constitution must be copied into local constitutions.
With this protection It is possible to stop the reform at the local level so that no judge or magistrate is dismissed, he noted.
Good news!
Do you remember the protection that we legislators of @movciudadanomx?
They granted us the suspension against the #ReformaJudicial. It prevents the reform from being implemented in the 32 states.
No local Congress can reform its Constitution to… pic.twitter.com/xGvl76tCfW
— Laura Ballesteros Mancilla 🚲💜💪 (@LBallesterosM) October 4, 2024
MSA
Related
2024-10-07 10:25:45