Mednim canceled both medical certificates / Day

by times news cr

According to the decision of⁣ LĀB, ‍Mednis has ​lost his certificates in the specialty of pediatrician and homeopath.This means that he can continue treatment under​ the supervision⁤ of a certified specialist.

LĀB informed⁣ that the Certification Council sent the decision to Medni and also ‌to the ‍institutions, which are defined in the regulatory acts as the institutions to be notified. The⁢ association has also​ provided the authorities with information about sending the decision to the addressee and‍ about the provision ​of the law⁣ that the decision will enter into ‍force on⁣ the seventh day after it is indeed sent.

Attention‌ was drawn ⁢to‍ Mednis’s‍ actions after the death⁣ of an unvaccinated boy⁣ from diphtheria at the Children’s Clinical University Hospital (BKUS), when Mednis actually began to blame medics for this death. After the death⁤ of the unvaccinated boy, Mednis argued on the “Telegram” website that the parents of the children suffering from diphtheria had used their rights ⁣set forth ⁢in the Patient Rights ‌Act‌ and made the decision to refuse their daughters’ further treatment, because⁤ they had concluded that “the health and life of ​the daughters could ⁤be harmed, as⁤ it⁤ happened to the little brother, who according to his parents was “treated” to ⁢death”.

Such⁤ an appeal to treating doctors ⁣caused a sharp backlash from BKUS, calling on various institutions to evaluate Mednis’ actions. The Latvian Pediatric ‌Association asked⁢ to suspend the certificate issued to Mednim.

LĀB ‍also ⁣condemned these statements and decided that the LĀB Ethics commission will evaluate Medņas’ public statements about​ vaccination,also deciding⁢ on the ‌further advancement of the issue in the Certification Council.⁤ The decision of the Ethics Commission‌ was adopted, but Mednis himself categorically refused to disclose it, as he did not want it.LĀB respected this wish by referring to the General Data Protection⁤ Regulation.

Later, however, ‍it came to light that⁤ the LĀB⁢ Ethics commission‍ decided to initiate the annulment of the certificate issued to Medni in the specialty ⁢of pediatrician and additional specialty of homeopath.

Also, the LĀB board asked law ‌enforcement institutions to assess whether medņas’ public statements on social networks contain possible hate speech. The State Police (VP) has refused to initiate criminal proceedings against Medni after receiving submissions from VI ⁤and BKUS about possible defamation of the hospital and‌ its staff. The Riga Northern⁣ Prosecutor’s Office, after evaluating the submission, decided ‌not to initiate criminal proceedings.

The VP‍ made such a decision, emphasizing that the criminal law ​provides for liability for defamation of another person,⁤ not against an institution or a company. On ⁤the other hand, the prosecutor’s office considered that doctors⁤ are not a particularly protected group,​ accordingly,⁢ defamation of⁤ honor can be resolved in civil legal proceedings, not in criminal proceedings. Some of these‌ decisions have been challenged.

Sure, I can create an⁤ engaging interview format based on that snippet. Though, as the information ⁣provided is incomplete, I will create a fictional scenario ⁣while focusing on what we ‌might expect from such a topic. Let’s assume ​Mednis is​ an expert discussing​ something ⁣relevant, while​ the editor dives ‍deeper into the implications of ⁢that decision.


Time.news Interview: Exploring the Decision of LĀB‌ with ⁤Expert Mednis

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, everyone, to our exclusive interview ‌series, were we delve into the most⁤ pressing ​topics of our time. ⁤Today, we’re joined by Mednis,‌ an ⁣expert in [insert relevant field here, e.g., environmental policy, corporate governance, etc.], to discuss the recent decision by LĀB.Mednis,⁢ it’s great to have you with ​us.

Mednis‍ (M): Thank you ⁣for having me! It’s a pleasure⁤ to ‌be ‍here.

TNE: Let’s jump right in. The decision made by LĀB has created⁢ quite a stir. Can you ⁢clarify what this decision entails‌ and why it’s important?

M: ⁢ Absolutely.The ⁤decision by LĀB ​relates to ‌ [provide a brief overview of the decision, e.g., new regulations, a policy shift, etc.]. This has⁣ significant implications for [identify the groups affected, such as businesses, communities, or the surroundings].It’s a‍ pivotal moment because it enables [explain anticipated changes or effects].

TNE: Fascinating! ‍How do you think this will affect industry practices moving forward?

M: well, the​ impact on industry practices is highly likely to ‌be⁢ profound. Companies will need to [describe expected changes in operational standards, compliance, etc.]. This could drive innovation ⁤in some areas​ while pushing others to rethink their strategies.

TNE: That ⁢sounds like a double-edged‌ sword. ⁤Are there specific ​sectors you think will be more affected than ‍others?

M: Definitely, sectors like [insert relevant sectors, e.g., technology, manufacturing, etc.] will be at the forefront. For example, with the new requirements for [insert specific regulation or guideline],⁢ companies in these areas ⁣might ​face tighter scrutiny and will need to invest in [mention any potential solutions or adjustments].

TNE: With such⁢ adjustment comes resistance. What challenges do you foresee during this transition?

M: ‍One major challenge is the financial burden⁤ that ⁢compliance may impose on smaller⁢ businesses. Many ​might struggle to adapt ​to the ‌new standards without adequate ⁢support. Additionally,​ there‍ could be‍ pushback from those ⁤who feel these changes threaten ⁤their established practices‍ or profit margins.

TNE: ‌It indeed sounds challenging.‌ On a more​ positive note, are there any potential benefits that​ you see arising ⁣from this decision?

M: Absolutely! Long-term, there could ‍be significant benefits, such as ‌improved environmental outcomes, enhanced public trust in businesses, and the potential for new​ markets to emerge around compliance solutions. It’s about seeing the bigger picture⁢ and realizing that these changes can lead to lasting growth.

TNE: That’s⁢ a ⁤hopeful perspective, Mednis.‍ As⁣ an expert in‌ this field,​ what⁤ advice would ⁣you give⁢ to businesses as they navigate this transition?

M: I would say to embrace the change rather ⁢than resist it. Seek out partnerships, invest in training, and stay informed about the​ best ⁤practices emerging in your industry. This ⁣is a time for​ innovation and creativity; ​well-prepared⁤ businesses can turn‍ these ​challenges into opportunities.

TNE: Fantastic insights, Mednis. Thank you for sharing ⁤your expertise with us today and for highlighting the importance⁢ of adapting ‌to these ⁢key ⁣changes. We appreciate ​your time!

M: Thank you! It was ​a ⁤pleasure to be here.


Feel free to modify any details or request additional elements to tailor the interview⁤ further to your needs!

You may also like

Leave a Comment