Memory and Controversy in Guinea
The issue of memory plagues Guinea, with recurring debates and contrasting narratives surrounding pivotal historical figures and events. Sensitive and often contentious, these discussions frequently pit Guineans against each other.
The recent viral video featuring the Minister of National Defense highlighted the ongoing controversy surrounding memorial issues. The Minister emphasized the need for unity and a shared understanding of history, citing the lack of conflict between historical figures like Almamy Samory Touré and Alpha Yaya Diallo.
However, some disagree. Amadou Diouldé Diallo contests the official narrative, claiming that Alpha Yaya Diallo never led any armed resistance against the French in Foutah. This sparks debate about the very nature of historical events and the validity of existing narratives.
The ambiguity surrounding the ages of these historical figures further fuels the controversy. While some sources suggest a 20-year age gap between the two, others contradict this, casting doubt on the argument that they never met.
The fragmentation of Guinean memory stems from the lack of comprehensive historical research and national reconciliation. The country needs a concerted effort to reconstruct its shared past, acknowledging the diverse perspectives and conflicting narratives that exist.
Until such a “real work of memory” materializes, the memorial landscape in Guinea remains contentious, with many clinging to the traditional narrative of Alpha Yaya Diallo as a prominent resistance leader.
Easy MARA, Juriste