The reform of the judiciary received a definitive suspension by a judge from Morelos which granted the appeal so that the debate on the initiative is stopped.
It is the same judge Fifth District in the State of Morelos, Martha Magana Lopezwho days ago granted a provisional suspension against the proposal.
In its resolution issued in favor of 4 complainants, the justice administrator ordered to stop for an indefinite period the debate of the reform of the judiciary.
Unlike the previous appeal that the Morelos judge granted, the one issued on the afternoon of Wednesday, September 4, is a definitive suspension to stop the debate on the initiative.
Debate on the reform of the Judicial Branch in the Chamber of Deputies (Daniel Augustus)
Morelos judge grants definitive suspension to stop debate on reform of the Judicial Branch
The judge from MorelosMartha Magaña López, granted a definitive suspension by means of which he ordered stop indefinitely the legislative process of the reform of the judiciary.
In the resolution issued in favor of 4 judges who promoted an amparo, the justice administrator established that to continue the debatethe Legislative Branch will be in contempt.
In this regard, the judge from Morelos ruled that if the debate on the reform of the Judicial Branch continues, the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office will be given notice of the commission of the crime of abuse of authority.
Regarding the reasons for the ruling, he explained that he granted the petition to the complainants because the Chamber of Deputies continued with the debate on the initiative despite the provisional suspension which was previously issued.
Similarly, he reiterated that the president AMLO through the Segob and the Constitutional Affairs Committee of the Chamber of Deputies, They did not submit the prior reports that he requested.
Who is Martha Magaña López? Judge who suspended discussion of reform to the Judicial Branch (Martha Magaña López via Instagram)
Judges filed an appeal seeking to stop the reform of the Judicial Branch
It is worth noting that 4 judges filed an appeal against the rReform of the Judiciaryin which they accused that they are trying to remove them from their positions without the right to defend themselves.
In light of this, the judge of Morelos ruled in favor of the complainants, as she noted that in addition to deny them the right to a hearingthey would also be deprived of the job security of a compensation.
For these reasons, he explained, he granted the definitive suspension in order to “make the act they claim not be formalized in the supreme norm”, since if it were to proceed, there would be a possibility that it would be unassailable.
“The above is because if the suspension is denied, at the time of the constitutional reform and the deadlines for the same have been met, the petitioners would be left in a state of defenselessness if they were eventually removed from their positions.”
Morelos judge’s ruling against the reform of the Judicial Branch
Despite previous suspensions in which the Chamber of Deputiesthe full has already met, debated and approved the opinion that is already in the hands of the Senate.
2024-09-05 06:57:38