2024-10-31 03:06:00
After six councilors of the National Electoral Institute (INE) proposed to initiate a constitutional dispute against the secondary laws of reform of the judiciary; the deputy of Morena, Sergio Gutierrez Lunapresented an initiative that proposes to reform the constitutional article 41 raise it to constitutional status the presidency of the INE can appoint the owners of the executive and technical bodies of the institute.
“The Presidency of the General Council will directly appoint the heads of the executive and technical bodies”establishes the reform initiative, in the art Section A, of Article 41 of the Constitution.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN: Six INE councilors propose controversy against judicial reform; Taddei’s powers are being questioned
That is, it will allow the president advisor of the INE appoint positions without the consent of Council of the National Electoral Institute.
Through social networks, the Morenoist federal deputy He referred to the six councilors who “they intended to weaken the will of the legislative power.”
“As a federal deputy, I presented an initiative to raise to the constitutional status that the president of the INE can appoint the heads of the executive and technical bodies of the institute”said Gutierrez Luna.
A group of INE advisors intends to undermine the will of the Legislative Power.
Therefore, as a federal deputy, 𝐚 𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐥𝐚 𝐥𝐚 𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐢 𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐚 𝐈𝐍𝐄 … pic.twitter.com/llJyb1r0Q1—Sergio Gutz. Luna (@Sergeluna_S)
October 30, 2024
The councilors yesterday Dania Ravel, Carla Humphrey, Claudia Zavala and advisors Arturo Castillo, Martín Faz and Jaime Rivera They proposed that the Executive Secretariat of the INE file a dispute against it two articles of reform of the General Law on electoral institutions and procedureswhich enhance the president of the INE, Guadalupe Taddei, make appointments without the approval of General Council of the Institute.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN: The president of the INE is not the head of the councilors: Carla Humphrey
“A group of INE advisors intends to undermine the will of the Legislative Power. For this reason, as a federal deputy, I presented an initiative to raise the constitutional status so that the presidency of the INE can designate the heads of the executive and technical bodies of the institute and thus the work in this body can advance.”he said. Gutiérrez Luna in his story X.
If approved, the Presidential advisor of the INE, Guadalupe Taddeicould appoint director positions without the consent of the rest of the members members of the INE General Council.
(With information from El Universal)
#Morena #presents #constitutional #reform #initiative #increase #Taddeis #powers #INE
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Constitutional Law Expert
Editor: Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. We have an intriguing development in Mexican politics concerning the National Electoral Institute, or INE. Recently, six councilors proposed a constitutional dispute regarding the judiciary reforms, leading to Deputy Sergio Gutierrez Luna’s initiative to modify Article 41 of the Constitution. To help us unpack this, we have Dr. Elena Martinez, a constitutional law expert. Dr. Martinez, welcome!
Dr. Martinez: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss such an important issue.
Editor: Firstly, let’s clarify what’s at stake. Deputy Gutierrez Luna’s initiative seeks to empower the president of the INE to appoint both executive and technical heads without consent from the INE Council. What are the potential implications of this change?
Dr. Martinez: This proposed reform could significantly alter the balance of power within the INE. By allowing the presidency to unilaterally appoint these critical roles, it raises questions about independence and neutrality. The INE is tasked with overseeing electoral processes, and any perceived politicization could undermine public trust in its operations.
Editor: Absolutely, and trust in electoral institutions is vital for democracy. Gutierrez Luna suggested that the councilors’ attempts at a constitutional dispute were aimed at weakening legislative power. How do you view this assertion?
Dr. Martinez: It’s crucial to understand that the INE operates with a degree of autonomy to ensure free and fair elections. Gutierrez’s framing of the councilors’ actions as an attempt to weaken the legislative authority may reflect a broader conflict between different branches of government, especially in an environment where electoral integrity is being fiercely debated.
Editor: And what about the timing of this initiative? With the judicial reforms being discussed in Congress, do you think there’s a strategic angle to this legislative proposal?
Dr. Martinez: Yes, timing plays a critical role in politics. Introducing this initiative amid discussions of judicial reform suggests a strategic move to consolidate control over the INE. If passed, it could allow the ruling party to exercise greater influence over electoral oversight in upcoming elections, altering the dynamics significantly.
Editor: Clearly, this initiative is more than just a legal adjustment; it’s politically charged. How might civil society react to such changes?
Dr. Martinez: Civil society has historically been very vocal about electoral reforms in Mexico. There is likely to be significant pushback from NGOs, political opposition, and the public. Many will argue that this encroaches on democratic safeguards. Protests and advocacy campaigns would be expected as citizens seek to protect the integrity of electoral processes.
Editor: It appears we are at a critical juncture for Mexico’s electoral framework. What do you envision as the best path forward to ensure fair oversight in this situation?
Dr. Martinez: A constructive dialogue among all stakeholders is essential. There should be an emphasis on protecting the independence of electoral bodies while considering necessary reforms to enhance their efficiency. Transparency in these processes is imperative, and involving civic groups in discussions could help rebuild trust in democratic institutions.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Martinez, for sharing your insights with us today. As we continue to watch the developments regarding the INE, it’s clear that the decisions made in the coming weeks will have a lasting impact on Mexico’s democratic landscape.
Dr. Martinez: Thank you for the opportunity. It’s crucial that we stay informed and engaged in these discussions.
Editor: Absolutely. We’ll be following this story closely. Thank you to our viewers for tuning in today!