Image source, Getty Images
Senior Citizens Marriage – File Image
(Today we compile some news items published in Indian newspapers on Wednesday 22.12.2021)
The news has come out that the social networking site of the daughter who remarried to her mother is going viral on the internet.
Remarriage for women in India is still unacceptable in the society. The socially minded efforts of today’s youth to put an end to this problem are appreciated by many. Receives and receives reception. Many such incidents have taken place in recent times.
The recent incident where son Tali was taken to his mother’s wedding in Tamil Nadu went viral on the internet and was appreciated by many. Likewise for her mother, the search for a groom by a daughter was greatly welcomed.
Meanwhile, a young woman posted on her Twitter page about her mother’s wedding events, which went viral on the internet and received great praise.
He also shared some videos related to the girl’s marriage on the social networking site and said that he is happy that his mother is starting a new life. Following this, many Netizens came to congratulate the mother on her marriage and to congratulate the woman (daughter) who happily registered.
Petition seeking removal of PM’s picture in vaccination certificate: Kerala Magistrate’s Court imposes Rs 1 lakh fine
Image source, Getty Images
Narendra Modi – File Image
The Kerala High Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition seeking removal of the Prime Minister’s picture from the corona vaccine certificate, with a fine, the Daily News reported.
‘The Prime Minister is not the leader of a political party; Ava is the leader of the nation. The court advised the petitioner that having a certificate containing his picture should not be considered as a disgrace. The court also ordered the petitioner to pay a fine of Rs 1 lakh.
Beta Myaliparambil had filed a petition in the Kerala High Court seeking removal of the Prime Minister’s portrait from the corona vaccination certificate. In it, he noted that “the presence of the Prime Minister’s image on the certificate containing his personal details is an act of interference in the privacy of the individual.”
The petition came up for hearing again on Tuesday in the presence of Judge PV Kunjikrishnan. The judge then said:
The vaccine certificate features a portrait of the Prime Minister with the slogan ‘Vaccine alone can eradicate corona’. What’s wrong with that?
If a person belongs to any party and is elected Prime Minister by the Constitution, he becomes the head of state. He is not called the BJP Prime Minister or the Congress Prime Minister. The Prime Minister’s political position and policy decisions may vary. However, it should not be taken lightly that the corona vaccine certificate has a portrait of the Prime Minister with the word “awareness”.
Therefore, this petition is dismissed. In addition, the petitioner was fined Rs 1 lakh. The petitioner has to pay the amount to the State Legal Services Commission within 6 weeks. Otherwise, the State Legal Services Commission will take action to recover that amount from the petitioner’s property.
The petitioner appears to have filed the petition for vain publicity, with political motives. We know that this fine is too high for the petitioner. However, the judge said that the fine was imposed so that the community would know the consequences of filing a petition for trivial reasons.
The word anti-national is not defined in law – Home Minister in the Lok Sabha
Image source, Getty Images
Parliament of India – File photo
According to the Hindu Tamil News, Union Home Minister Nithyananda Roy has said in the Lok Sabha that the word ‘anti-national’ is not clearly defined or defined in law.
Azaduddin Owaisi, leader of the AIMIM party, asked what the word “anti-national” meant, whether there was any mention of it in law, and whether the word was used in any law in force.
Numerous people have been arrested in various states in the name of anti-national activities for the last 3 years. It was questioned whether its details should also be released.
Union Home Minister Nithyananda Roy gave a written reply in the Lok Sabha. He said the word “anti-national” was not clearly defined in law and was not explained.
At the same time, there are criminal law and various judicial rulings to crack down on illegal and provocative activities that are detrimental to the unity and integrity of the country.
Accordingly, the Constitution Amendment to the 42nd Amendment to the Constitution in 1976 defines anti-national activity during Section 31D, ie during the period of implementation of the Emergency. However, it was repealed in 1977 by the 43rd Amendment.
The responsibility for maintaining law and order, especially the investigation, prosecution and prosecution, comes under the responsibility of the state government to protect one’s life and property. The police and the public peace will come under the control of the state government. The federal government has no information on arrests made by state governments in anti-national activities, “the statement said.