Manchester City opened the 16th round of the English league today (Saturday) with a 0: 1 victory over Wolves from a controversial penalty in the 66th minute, which was scored by Raheem Sterling after a hand doubt in Wolves’ field. At the end of the game the decision on the penalty led to criticism of the team and referee Jonathan Moss from various fans in England. One of the most notable reactions was of Mark Goldbridge Associated with Manchester United, City’s city rival: “The penalty that City need requires a commission of inquiry and a report. Robbery, fraud and theft are among the charges. “
Coach Wolves, Bruno Laja, Attacked the VAR: “I defend him every time, he is good for football, but the ball hit the hand and not the other way around. It is not serious, there was no penalty. Raoul Jimenez did not have to get a red, he did not touch him in the first offense.” Jimenez got two yellows a minute, after trying to interrupt the ball out seconds after the first.
Sam me what “Athletic“Analyzed the game:” It’s a tough game and it’s a good win, especially in the second half, but how was the only goal that penalty? “ Adam Roo He also criticized: “The penalty is just ripping. There is not a single person in the world who would believe it is a penalty, including the referee and the VAR. Madness.”
Should Manchester City have had a penalty?
Yes or no ???? pic.twitter.com/lgpvLFhG4w
— EPL Bible (@EPLBible) December 11, 2021
The English League of Referees, on the other hand, backed Moss: “The use of multiple angles has led to there being no unequivocal decision to change the referee’s decision.” It is not clear what the consequences of Moss’ decisions will be, if at all.
.