After being arrested for the case of Vineyardo Nikos Romanos, with his text-statement, he emphasizes that he denies the indictment in its entirety.”My life it is indeed sold as a political product, on the shelf of the interaction supermarket, and I am charged the price of the bag” finishing by saying that he will not except the measure of pre-trial detention” without a legal and political battle. win back my life”, states among other things.
It is recalled that the Nikos Romanos yes remand in custody for a print found in a bag in the apartment where the explosion.
Romanos’ statement in detail:
“Monday the 18th of November was the day when time stood up for me again. Anti-terrorist hoodies,handcuffs,detention centers,TV cameras,news reports,journalistic scripts,police theories.
behind this familiar pattern and the communication storm of guilt, there is another reality.
It is indeed the traumas that are brought back and have a multiplying effect,tearing families apart,destroying human relationships,destroying dreams,hopes,life plans to be condemned again to death in frozen time.
Because the language of truth cannot be concealed, I repeat, I deny the indictment in its entirety.
A wild, baseless, inflated, unsupported indictment, which arises offensively, creating more questions than the answers it actually provides.
According to the fixed political logic of the anti-terrorism law that creates a category of persecution that is outside the legal right, as everyone is guilty until proven guilty.The language spoken by the system has already been criticized.
I became a wandering prey for all kinds of exploitation. Exhibition in museum exhibitions lies and forgotten. With the sign ”terrorist” hanging on the annex “culprits all weather”, to look at visitors usually naive, but mostly scary and peaceful.
To those who gamble human lives on the dice of obscene political gambling, to those who think their power enables them to crush souls for their own reasons, I will repeat the obvious.
From the bloody pedestrian street of Messolonghi, the investigative offices, the gray corridors of the prisons, the courtrooms, the slow death of imprisonment. Of all the choices I have made with all my soul, choices carved with real blood, at great expense and fruitless kneeling, I do not surrender even a millimeter.
It is indeed part of the story of a generation of people who rebelled and on their backs, large parts of the political system washed away their sins by hanging them on the pegs of the prohibitionist cannibals and the media.
But now I’m not in prison as I made conscious choices that had corresponding risks.
Rather, my life is being sold as a political product, on the shelf of the communications supermarket, and being charged the price of the bag, waiting for the potential voters to shop the merchandise piece by piece until the next time.
It saddens me (and not only) that I will be asked to prove that I am not an elephant, with a threatened sentence hanging over my head that will condemn me to live again, indefinitely, as a prisoner. .
I have spent half my adult life in prison. I will not accept without a fight this unjust statistic of immeasurable pain and loneliness, which would cover me with concrete and bars.
I will not accept extreme measures like pre-trial detention without a legal and political battle to get my life back.
In this first urgent and necesary placement I want to thank from the bottom of my heart those who stood by me with selfless love. Now begins the fight for my truth and my release from this unjust indictment.
Rather of an epilogue…
Honour to those in their lives
they defined and defended Thermopylae.
Don’t hunt any movers;
just and fair in all their actions,
but even with sorrow and mercy;
brave if they are rich, and when
they are poor, yet brave in their youth,
running together again as much as they can;
always speaking the truth,
except without hatred for the false ones.
And they deserve more credit
when they predicted (and predicted a lot)
that the Nightmare will appear at the end,
and the Medes will live at last.
(Constantinos Cavafys)”.
Related news
what are the main legal challenges Nikos Romanos faces in his case?
Interview between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert on the Case of Nikos Romanos
Editor: Welcome to our discussion today.We have with us Dr. Elena Markou, a legal scholar and expert in political asylum and human rights law, to unpack the recent developments surrounding Nikos Romanos’ case. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Markou.
Dr. Markou: Thank you for having me. It’s an significant subject that merits attention.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. Nikos Romanos has declared that he ”denies the indictment in it’s entirety” and likened his life to a “political product.” What do you make of this analogy, and how does it reflect the context of his situation?
Dr. Markou: Romanos’ language is revealing. By describing himself as a “political product,” he’s highlighting how his personal narrative has been commodified within the political arena. This suggests he feels objectified, caught in a web of political machinations rather than being seen as an individual with rights and dignity. It underscores the tension between personal tragedy and political narrative.
Editor: He also mentions not accepting pre-trial detention “without a legal and political battle.” What implications does this statement have for the legal landscape in cases involving political dissent?
Dr. Markou: Romanos’ stance indicates a willingness to challenge the system, which is crucial in cases of perceived political repression. Pre-trial detention can frequently enough be a tool for silencing dissent, so his refusal to submit passively represents a pushback against what he sees as unjust treatment. it may also invoke broader discussions about the rights of individuals in politically charged situations and the necessity of due process.
Editor: In his statement, Romanos speaks of “traumas” that tear families apart and destroy dreams. Can you elaborate on the psychological effects of such political and legal battles on individuals and families?
Dr. Markou: Absolutely. The psychological toll is immense. When individuals like Romanos are embroiled in legal disputes, particularly those framed within a political context, it compounds their personal suffering. Families may experience stress, division, and even stigma. The lasting implications can reverberate through generations, creating a cycle of trauma that can be difficult to escape.
Editor: Romanos also reflects on the “communication storm” of guilt and the media narrative surrounding his case. How significant is the role of media in shaping public perception in these instances?
Dr. Markou: The media plays a dual role here; it can amplify voices and bring attention to injustices, but it can also be complicit in perpetuating narratives that demonize individuals facing charges. In politically charged cases, how the media frames the narrative can heavily influence public opinion, leading to either support or condemnation. This can create a unfriendly environment for defendants, further complicating their pursuit of justice.
Editor: What do you think the next steps will be for Romanos and his legal team? What strategies might they employ in his defense?
Dr. Markou: Given his determination to contest the charges politically and legally, I would expect his legal team to focus on challenging the validity of the evidence and the circumstances of his arrest. They may argue for his rights under international human rights law, emphasizing the principles of fair trial and due process. Additionally, harnessing public support and leveraging social media could strengthen his campaign against pre-trial detention.
Editor: In closing, what broader implications does Romanos’ case hold for society and for individuals facing similar circumstances?
Dr. Markou: Romanos’ case is emblematic of the challenges that many face when political dissent is criminalized. It serves as a cautionary tale about the fragility of civil liberties in volatile political climates. The outcome may set precedents for how similar cases are treated in the future, influencing both the legal framework and the societal narrative around dissenters. It’s a pivotal moment for those who advocate for human rights and justice.
Editor: Thank you,Dr. Markou, for your insights. This conversation reveals just how deeply intertwined legal and political landscapes can be, especially in cases like Nikos Romanos. We appreciate your time and expertise.
dr. Markou: Thank you for having me. It’s imperative that we continue to discuss these issues openly.