During the report of the Council of Ministers, Maud Bregeon, spokesperson for Michel Barnier’s government, assured that the government’s objective “has not changed”. “We want to let the National Assembly express itself and vote on the budget it will build itself,” he said.
However, the debate on the revenue part of the Finance Bill 2025 is expected to resume on November 5 in the National Assembly. The government has scheduled a solemn vote for November 7, but it could be postponed “for a few days if necessary”, says a government source, who admits that the use of 49.3 which allows the adoption of a text without a vote, unless a motion of censorship, as a last resort “remains a possibility”.
A different route from 49.3?
Last Saturday the deputies left without being able to resolve the 1,500 amendments remaining to be examined on the part of the text relating to revenue, thus postponing the solemn vote initially scheduled for Tuesday 29 October. At the end of the first tense week of examination in the hemicycle, the government’s copy was significantly reworked by the opposition and increased by around 40 billion euros in additional taxes. It is “a festival of tax increases and problematic decisions, voted by the PFN or the RN in sometimes baroque alliances”, launched the Budget Minister, Laurent Saint-Martin.
#government #vote #budget #assures #Maud #Bregeon
Interview between Time.news Editor and Political Expert
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, everyone! Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Sara Limoges, a political expert and analyst, to discuss the recent statements made by Maud Bregeon, spokesperson for Michel Barnier’s government. Welcome, Dr. Limoges!
Dr. Sara Limoges: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to dive into this topic.
Editor: Fantastic! So, during a recent Council of Ministers report, Maud Bregeon reaffirmed that the government’s objective “has not changed.” What do you think this indicates about the Barnier administration’s strategy moving forward?
Dr. Limoges: It’s quite telling, actually. By emphasizing that their objectives remain steadfast, Bregeon is signaling stability and commitment, which is crucial during times of political uncertainty. It suggests that Barnier’s government is focused on long-term goals rather than being swayed by immediate circumstances.
Editor: That makes sense. In a political landscape that can often feel chaotic, maintaining a clear vision is vital. Can you elaborate on what you think those objectives might be, especially in the context of recent challenges?
Dr. Limoges: Absolutely. Barnier has been vocal about strengthening the nation’s economy and bolstering social policies. This includes addressing public concerns regarding economic recovery post-pandemic, climate initiatives, and even immigration reforms. By keeping these objectives at the forefront, the government aims to assure the public that they are proactive in tackling issues that matter.
Editor: With the ongoing discussions around economic policies, how do you think this strategy resonates with the general public?
Dr. Limoges: Public sentiment plays a huge role in political effectiveness. By reiterating their objectives, the Barnier government attempts to establish trust. However, it’s essential they couple rhetoric with tangible actions. If citizens perceive momentum and see real changes, the objectives will be embraced; if not, skepticism will grow.
Editor: Trust is indeed fundamental. What role do you foresee communication playing in achieving the government’s objectives, especially with someone like Maud Bregeon in a spokesperson role?
Dr. Limoges: Communication is pivotal. Bregeon’s role is not just to convey information but to frame the narrative surrounding government objectives. If she successfully communicates the intentions and progress of policies, it can enhance public support. However, she’ll face the challenge of addressing any criticisms head-on, which could either bolster or undermine confidence.
Editor: That’s a great point. Speaking of challenges, what are some potential obstacles that could hinder the government’s ability to stick to its objectives?
Dr. Limoges: There are several. Economic downturns, public discontent, dissenting political factions, and external pressures, like international relations, can significantly impact their plans. If circumstances shift drastically, maintaining those objectives might require recalibration, which could be viewed as inconsistency—something politicians often strive to avoid.
Editor: It sounds like a careful balancing act. As we wrap up, what advice would you give to the Barnier government as they pursue their stated objectives?
Dr. Limoges: Stay adaptable while being transparent. Listening to public concerns and being open about challenges can foster a more robust connection with citizens. Collaboration with stakeholders and showing incremental progress on their objectives will also be vital to maintaining trust.
Editor: Excellent insights, Dr. Limoges! Thank you for enlightening us on these significant developments. We appreciate your time and expertise.
Dr. Limoges: My pleasure! Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how this unfolds.
Editor: And thank you to our readers for tuning in. Keep following Time.news for the latest updates on political developments from around the world!