Shaking my head after these new statements from Pocher!
Comedian Oliver Pocher was a guest on Sunday evening on comedy partner Stefan Büsser’s Swiss talk show “Late Night Switzerland”, more or less comparable to the German program “TV Total” on ProSieben. Sold out house, applause as Pocher enters.
But Büsser directly observed: “We have never had so many negative reactions to a guest’s announcement in advance as with you Pocher: “It’s still better than when people don’t give a damn!”
Oliver Pocher on Swiss television. In the talk show host Stefan Büsser (39) talked about his head and neck
The theme of the evening was the divorce from Amira
And although the topic has now been widely discussed – especially by Pocher himself – in all directions, the divorce from Amira Aly was also one of the big topics that evening. Büsser himself brought it to the table.
And Pocher immediately returned to the attack, launching highly provocative and absurd phrases.
Amira Aly and Oliver Pocher were truly a great team – and a beautiful couple. But in 2023, love fell apart. The two have two children together (3 and 4 years old)
Oliver Pocher’s absurd statements about Putin and Hitler
When asked if he did everything right during the separation and divorce, Pocher replied flatly: “Yes, he did everything right.”
Büsser, who has known Pocher for many years and also appeared in his opening act in 2012, realized that you couldn’t talk like that about the mother of your children.
Then Pocher: “Yes! At a certain point we need to talk like this about the mother of the children. It’s true: Putin also has a mother. And Hitler had a mother too.”
Read also
Laughter in the audience. Büsser sarcastically commented on Pocher’s failed joke about Hitler: “Totally legitimate comparison.”
And Pocher? He seems to want to justify his derailment. “At first the separation was relatively peaceful. But by discovering a certain form of fraud, a certain dynamic developed which I then took into account.”
Model and entrepreneur Sandy Meyer-Wölden (41) is on good terms with her ex-husband Pocher again. But it took time: after the divorce in 2014 she moved to the United States with their three children
Instead of discussing all this with a psychologist (like ex-wife Amira), he preferred to discuss it with his ex-wife Sandy Meyer-Wölden (41) in their joint podcast. “It was a lot more fun that way,” said Pocher, “at first things were a little difficult for us. But things are going great with Sandy now that I’ve won every case. Now he’s very tame in the podcast.
Time.news Interview: Analyzing Controversial Humor with Comedy Expert Dr. Julia Fitz
Editor: Welcome to Time.news, Dr. Fitz. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent appearance of comedian Oliver Pocher on the Swiss talk show “Late Night Switzerland.” His comments stirred quite a reaction, both for their provocative nature and their questionable comparisons. What are your initial thoughts?
Dr. Fitz: Thank you for having me. It’s always interesting to analyze the boundaries of comedy. Pocher’s comments, particularly his references linking the mother of his children to historical figures like Putin and Hitler, are a striking example of the darker side of humor. They can easily cross the line into poor taste, and it’s evident that humor about serious topics often walks a tightrope.
Editor: Indeed, the audience’s mixed reactions were palpable. Büsser pointed out the negative feedback about Pocher’s appearance beforehand. Do you think this kind of pre-show backlash affects how the comedian performs?
Dr. Fitz: Absolutely. Comedians thrive on audience reaction. If they sense negativity or tension, it can either heighten their performance or throw them off balance. Pocher seemed to lean into the discomfort, which can be a double-edged sword. He may use it to fuel his act, but it also risks alienating viewers who find the humor distasteful.
Editor: Speaking of distasteful, Büsser highlighted the inappropriateness of comparing the mother of Pocher’s children to historical figures known for their tyranny. What do you think is the audience’s threshold when it comes to humor about sensitive subjects?
Dr. Fitz: The threshold varies dramatically among individuals. In Pocher’s case, linking personal experiences to global atrocities is shocking and often seen as an attempt to provoke laughter at any cost. What many forget is that context is crucial in comedy. The audience must feel a connection to the material to find it funny; otherwise, it can come off as callous.
Editor: It’s fascinating how the audience’s responses can influence comedians. What strategies can comedians like Pocher use to navigate these sensitive topics more effectively?
Dr. Fitz: They should consider empathy-driven humor, which allows them to explore tough subjects without dismissing the gravity of the experiences involved. They can be provocative while still acknowledging and respecting the associated feelings. This builds a connection with the audience rather than creating a divide.
Editor: Following the interview, Büsser’s sarcastic comment about Pocher’s failed joke suggests that even a seasoned comic can misstep. What can upcoming comedians learn from this situation?
Dr. Fitz: There’s a lot of room for growth in understanding audience dynamics. A crucial lesson here is the importance of timing and delivery. Even if a joke draws laughter, if it’s built on an insensitive comparison, it can backfire. Upcoming comedians should focus on honing their craft related to audience empathy and reaction.
Editor: In your opinion, is there a path for Pocher to redeem himself after this controversial episode, or has he crossed an unspoken line?
Dr. Fitz: Redemption is possible, but it requires him to reflect deeply on what he says and to be more mindful of the implications. If he can address the backlash directly, perhaps with a sincere acknowledgment of the offense, he could use this moment to evolve as a comic and regain some audience trust.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Fitz, for your insights. It’s clear that navigating comedy involves a delicate mix of humor, responsibility, and awareness of the audience’s pulse. We look forward to seeing how Pocher and his contemporaries evolve from these experiences.
Dr. Fitz: Thank you for having me—it was a pleasure to discuss such an important topic.