In a significant political growth in Onex, right-wing parties are voicing strong opposition to the municipality’s proposed acquisition of a parcel valued at nearly two million francs.This contentious issue has sparked a heated debate among local leaders and is set to become a focal point in the upcoming electoral campaign. The decision, which was discussed in an emergency meeting of the municipal council, reflects broader concerns about fiscal duty and land use in the region. as the community prepares for a potential referendum, the implications of this acquisition could shape the political landscape in Onex for years to come.Onex’s municipal council convened urgently last Thursday to approve the acquisition of a parcel of land for 1.96 million francs, a decision that has sparked controversy. The vote, which saw support primarily from the Socialist party and the Greens, has been met with opposition from a right-wing coalition planning to launch a referendum against the purchase. Critics argue that there is no concrete project associated with the land, while Mayor Maryam Yunus Ebener defends the acquisition as vital for the community’s future. This development highlights ongoing tensions in local governance regarding land use and community planning.A coalition of right-wing parties in Onex, including ECHO Vert’lib, PLR, MCG, UDC, and Center, has initiated a referendum against the municipal government’s recent decision to purchase a property on chemin du Pré-Longet 2. Municipal councilor nathalie Keller, who is leading the referendum, criticizes the lack of a concrete development plan and highlights the town’s precarious financial situation.The property is subject to a local zoning plan that mandates 70% of the space for commercial use and only 30% for housing, raising questions about the legality of the municipality’s right to preemptively acquire it. In contrast, Mayor Maryam Yunus Ebener argues that the acquisition is crucial for the community to influence future housing and commercial developments, ensuring that local interests are prioritized.
In a significant move for local governance, referendum supporters in Onex are gearing up to launch their campaign as the electoral season kicks off. They aim to gather 676 signatures within a tight 40-day window,a crucial step in advancing their proposal. This initiative not only highlights the active civic engagement in the region but also poses questions about the municipality’s ability to exercise its preemptive rights in this context, as officials remain uncertain about the legal implications. The outcome could set a precedent for future local governance decisions.
In a significant display of direct democracy, Swiss voters participated in the November 2024 referendums, where a well-funded “yes” campaign garnered over CHF4 million, marking the highest budget for a ballot item this year. The results reflect the Swiss populace’s engagement in critical issues, showcasing the effectiveness of organized campaigning in shaping public opinion. As the nation continues to navigate complex political landscapes, these referendums serve as a testament to the power of citizen participation in governance, reinforcing Switzerland’s reputation as a leader in democratic practices. For more insights on the outcomes and implications of these votes, visit Swissinfo [[1]](https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/swiss-politics/seven-lessons-from-the-november-2024-swiss-votes/88309966).
Time.news Q&A: The Controversy Over Onex’s Land Acquisition
Editor: Today, we’re discussing the recent decision by the Onex municipal council too acquire land valued at nearly two million francs, which has ignited significant political debate and opposition from right-wing parties. Joining us is Dr. François Dupont, a political analyst with expertise in local governance. François, can you provide us with an overview of the situation?
Dr. Dupont: Absolutely. The acquisition of this land on chemin du Pré-Longet has become a contentious issue in Onex. The municipal council’s decision, primarily supported by the Socialist Party and the Greens, aims to secure land for future community growth. Though, it has faced strong backlash from a coalition of right-wing parties, who are calling for a referendum against this purchase, arguing that there is no clear development plan associated with the land.
Editor: What are the main concerns from the opposition parties regarding this acquisition?
Dr.Dupont: The opposition voices are primarily concerned about the lack of a concrete project linked to the land. Municipal councilor Nathalie Keller has pointed out that the town is in a precarious financial situation and questions the legality of the municipality’s power to acquire this property based on local zoning rules, which dictate that 70% must be designated for commercial use. Critics advocate for clarity and clearer interaction regarding the intended use of the space, fearing financial overreach by the municipality.
Editor: So, with a referendum likely on the horizon, what implications does this have for the local governance in Onex?
Dr. Dupont: A referendum could significantly alter the local political landscape. It emphasizes civic engagement, showcasing how voters can actively influence governance. If the right-wing coalition manages to gather the required 676 signatures within 40 days, it could lead to a direct vote which may overturn the council’s decision and set a precedent for how such acquisitions are handled in the future. It raises broader questions about fiscal responsibility and the priorities of local governance.
Editor: How does this situation reflect the wider trends in Swiss democracy, especially in the context of recent referendums?
Dr.Dupont: This case in Onex illustrates Switzerland’s robust system of direct democracy. The triumphant “yes” campaign in the November 2024 referendums, which garnered over CHF4 million, shows how organized campaigning can effectively shape public opinion on critical issues. The Onex situation resonates with this because it incorporates significant civic involvement and has the potential to engage voters on issues of governance, land use, and community priorities. It reinforces the idea that citizen participation is vital in shaping local policies and can lead to meaningful change.
Editor: What practical advice would you offer to the citizens of Onex as they navigate this complex issue?
Dr.Dupont: Citizens should remain informed about both sides of the argument and engage in discussions about the implications of the land acquisition. It’s important for residents to participate in public forums and express their concerns or support. They may also consider joining the campaign to gather signatures if they align with the referendum’s goals. Active participation is key in ensuring that their voices are heard in such significant decisions.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Dupont, for your insights. This situation in Onex not only highlights the ongoing dynamics of local governance but also the importance of civic engagement in shaping community futures.