– Ønsker ikke at kongehuset skal være til salgs – NRK Norge – Oversikt over nyheter fra ulike deler av landet

by time news

Princess Märtha Louise and ‍Durek Verrett’s wedding has sparked meaningful controversy after they sold exclusive ⁣photo rights to Hello Magazine and ⁢Netflix, raising questions about the commercialization of the​ Norwegian royal family. In a recent interview, King Harald emphasized that the royal ⁣family does not wish to⁤ be “for sale,” stating that while they⁤ allowed photography when the press was present, they ‌refrained from private photos to maintain a ‍boundary. The wedding,held in ‌Geiranger,was closely⁣ monitored,with only select media allowed to document the event,while the ⁣rest⁣ of the press was left to capture ⁤the couple’s public appearances. this decision has ignited discussions‍ about the balance between royal privacy and public interest.

fx.nrk.no/6pyQWt7y9Cr1hCzA6G3ghwp1DHcJTJEPl7oaHw4v6n5w.jpg 450w, https://gfx.nrk.no/6pyQWt7y9Cr1hCzA6G3ghwYg-asN5EgdN7oaHw4v6n5w.jpg 650w,https://gfx.nrk.no/6pyQWt7y9Cr1hCzA6G3ghwIp6RySlOnvZ7oaHw4v6n5w.jpg 1000w, https://gfx.nrk.no/6pyQWt7y9Cr1hCzA6G3ghwsIFMa-72kqx7oaHw4v6n5w.jpg 1200w, https://gfx.nrk.no/6pyQWt7y9Cr1hCzA6G3ghw07xSiaxnOld7oaHw4v6n5w.jpg ⁢1600w,https://gfx.nrk.no/6pyQWt7y9Cr1hCzA6G3ghwdkJD-cU-93F7oaHw4v6n5w.jpg 2000w” src=”″ loading=”eager” ‌alt=”Geiranger 20240831. Kong Harald,dronning Sonja,kronprins ‍Haakon,kronprinsesse ⁢Mette-Marit,prinsesse Ingrid Alexandra,prins Sverre Magnus ombord ⁢på Kongeskipet ‌i‌ Geirangerfjorden hvor de deltar i Märtha Louise og Durek Verrett sitt Bryllup.Foto: cornelius ​Poppe / NTB / ⁢POOL” title=”Foto: Cornelius Poppe / NTB”/>

Kongen ⁢inviterte NTB på vegne av pressenorge om bord Kongeskipet for å ta ‍bilde av kongefamilien⁢ før bryllupet. Bildet ble delt med hele pressen.

Foto: ⁢Cornelius Poppe / NTB

Bruden selv ⁤var iført brudekjole og en tiara hun fikk av bestefar kong Olav til 18-årsdagen da hun «tittet frem» fra lakenene.

Tiaraen var ‌det tilnærmet eneste kongelige innslaget i bryllupet.

fra kongehusets medlemmer var⁢ det kongelige tonet‍ ned:

  • det var ikke kongeflagg i sjaluppen som fraktet kongeparet ‍inn til land fra Kongeskipet, slik det vanligvis ellers er når kongen er om‍ bord.
  • Det var sivile skilter på bilene kongehuset‍ benyttet.
  • Dronning Sonja,​ kronprinsesse Mette-Marit, prinsesse ⁣ingrid Alexandra og prinsesse Astrid brukte⁢ ikke tiara eller ordensbånd/ordener.
  • Kong ‍Harald ⁣og kronprins Haakon hadde på seg smoking, ikke uniform, og hadde ⁤ikke ordener/ordensbånd.
  • Kongen⁢ holdt ikke tale, slik han gjorde ​forrige gang datteren giftet seg.

Privat arrangement

– Kongehuset ønsket hele ​tiden å meddele at dette var⁢ et privat arrangement. slottet var også veldig tydelig på at⁢ dette arrangementet har ⁢vi absolutt ‍ingenting med å gjøre, sier historiker og forfatter Trond Norén Isaksen.

– ⁢Så det var et ‍forsøk på ⁢å ‌tone ‍ned det ‍offisielle og balansere det ​mot ⁤det private.⁢ Samtidig som de som hadde kjøpt⁣ og ⁤betalt bryllupet, veldig gjerne ville fremheve det kongelige.

Prinsesse Märtha Louise og durek Verrett gifter seg i Geiranger

Kong Harald og dronning Sonja stilte i smoking og ‌bunad i vielsen.

Foto: Cornelius Poppe / NTB

har dialog om ‍tittelbruk: Skal forklare ⁢dem hva vi mener om⁣ det

Salget ⁢av⁣ bilderettighetene i​ bryllupet skapte nok en gang diskusjoner ⁤om prinsesse Märtha‌ Louise’ bruk av tittelen.

Kongehuset har tidligere bekreftet ‍at de skal ha samtaler‌ med prinsesse Märtha Louise om avtalen⁤ de har om hennes bruk av prinsessetittelen i kommersiell virksomhet.

– Det ‍har vi ‍en løpende dialog‌ om nå, sier⁢ kong​ Harald til⁤ «Året med kongefamilien».

–⁣ Så får vi​ prøve​ å forklare dem hva ⁤vi ⁤mener om den‌ saken.⁣ Så ⁢får vi ⁢se.

Verken prinsPrincess Märtha Louise and her manager Carina Scheele Carlsen have expressed interest‌ in participating​ in an ⁢interview with NRK for ⁢the upcoming series “A Year with the Royal Family.” Following her recent marriage to Durek Verrett, the⁣ couple was closely ⁤followed⁣ by a Netflix film crew as ⁢they engaged with ⁤the press⁣ and public. A recent ⁢poll revealed that nearly 70% of respondents beleive⁤ the princess should relinquish her royal ​title, sparking significant discussion about her future role within the royal family.
Time.news ​Editor: ⁤Welcome, adn thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent royal wedding of Princess Märtha Louise and Durek Verrett. There seems to⁣ be a important public outcry following‌ thier decision to sell exclusive photo rights to outlets like Hello Magazine and Netflix. What are your thoughts on this commercialization of ​the⁤ Norwegian royal family?

Expert: Thank you for⁣ having me. Yes, this decision certainly raises critically important questions about the balance between the royal family’s public duties and their private lives. King Harald has expressed a‍ desire to keep ⁤the royal family from being perceived as “for sale,” emphasizing that while they are open to media coverage during‌ official engagements, there should be boundaries, especially regarding private moments like a ‌wedding [1[1[1[1].

Time.news Editor: Exactly. The tension between maintaining royal privacy and​ satisfying public interest has never⁣ been more apparent. Though, many people feel that​ selling photo rights might blur those lines further. Do you believe⁣ this sets a dangerous precedent for future royal events?

Expert: ‍ It certainly could. The Norwegian royal family, ​unlike some ​other ‌monarchies,‌ has⁤ generally been careful about how ‍they⁢ navigate media relations. by opting for exclusivity, they risk alienating both the⁢ press ⁣and the public who feel entitled to shared experiences of such significant ‌events. The wedding was tightly controlled, with only select media permitted ‌to document ‌it​ while others were relegated to capturing public appearances [1[1[1[1]. This ‌creates a divide between the “insiders” and “outsiders,” which can foster resentment.

Time.news Editor: You mentioned resentment. Do you think that could impact the royal family’s image in Norway?

Expert: absolutely. the Norwegian monarchy has traditionally enjoyed strong public support, ‍but⁢ actions perceived ‌as‍ overly commercial may lead to skepticism. King Harald’s comments about maintaining a boundary illustrate a recognition of the concerns among the ​public, signaling that the royal family does not wish to commodify their image. Though,it’s a fine line⁤ they ‌walk; they must engage with ‌media and modern entertainment avenues while staying true to their roots [1[1[1[1].

Time.news Editor: The wedding ⁤itself was remarkable, held in Geiranger with gorgeous scenery.How does the choice of venue ‍contribute to the narrative surrounding the royal family?

Expert: The choice of Geiranger,a UNESCO⁤ World Heritage site,contributes to a romantic and nationalistic narrative. it ⁢highlights Norway’s natural beauty. However, the ‌exclusive rights to photos taken there shift the⁤ focus toward commercialization rather than celebrating national identity. Events like royal weddings often symbolize unity and tradition, but⁢ when ⁤intertwined​ with ​media⁢ deals, they can instead appear as mere⁣ spectacles [1[1[1[1].

Time.news Editor: It ‌seems‍ there’s a lot to unpack here regarding royal traditions⁤ facing modern​ pressures. How do you think the royal family should navigate ⁢these changes going forward?

Expert: The royal family might benefit from embracing a more transparent approach to media interactions while still preserving privacy. They can also explore innovative ways⁣ to‍ engage with the public ‌that emphasize their role, history, and the ⁢national spirit, avoiding excessive commercialization. A balance must be sought—respecting the audience’s interest while safeguarding their⁤ dignity as a royal institution [1[1[1[1].

Time.news Editor: Thank you for ‌your insights. It’s‌ clear that the dialog surrounding Princess Märtha Louise and Durek verrett’s wedding will ⁤continue, impacting how the Norwegian royal family engages with both media and the public in the future.

You may also like

Leave a Comment