South Korea’s opposition on Monday accused the ruling party of orchestrating a “second coup” by clinging to power and refusing to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol for declaring martial law.
“No matter how they try to justify it, the essence remains intact: this is the illegal and unconstitutional act of a second insurrection and a second coup,” said Democratic Party leader park Chan-dae, calling on the ruling party to “ stop this promptly.”
Yoon plunged the country into political chaos wiht his attempt to undermine civilian rule through martial law that was in effect for six hours, until lawmakers managed to break through the military blockade to enter parliament and vote to repeal the measure.
Under South Korea’s constitution, the president is head of government and commander-in-chief of the military unless he is incapacitated or resigns, in which case power woudl be handed over on an interim basis to the prime minister until new elections are held.
According to Park, pretending that Yoon can remain in office but delegate his powers to the prime minister, who was not elected, is a “flagrant constitutional violation without any legal basis.”
Investigators detained the former defense minister, raided his office, imposed travel bans on several senior officials and on Monday summoned the general who assumed command of martial law for questioning.
yoon coudl also be called to testify, police said Monday, and said they are considering banning him from traveling abroad.
“Ther are no human or physical restrictions on who can be investigated,” said Woo Jong-soo, head of the National Investigation Headquarters of the National Police Agency.
He stated that police will investigate “in accordance with the law and principles, without exceptions” in South Korea.
Related
How might President Yoon’s martial law declaration affect public trust in the government?
Interview with Dr. Min-Jae Lee: Political Analyst on Recent Unrest in South korea
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Lee.Thank you for joining us today too discuss the recent political chaos in South Korea surrounding President Yoon Suk Yeol and the controversial declaration of martial law. Can you start by explaining the meaning of these events?
Dr. Lee: Thank you for having me. The events we are witnessing are notable not only for South Korea but also for democratic governance globally. The accusations from the opposition party, notably from leader Park Chan-dae, labeling Yoon’s actions as a “second coup,” highlight serious concerns about the preservation of civilian rule. The recent martial law declaration, albeit brief—lasting only six hours—demonstrates an alarming willingness to sidestep constitutional norms.
Editor: Absolutely, the swift parliamentary response was indicative of the tension. What are the constitutional implications of President Yoon’s decision to declare martial law?
Dr. Lee: Under South korea’s constitution,the president is the commander-in-chief and has specific powers. However, these powers are designed to be checks and balances with parliamentary authority. Yoon’s attempts to delegate his powers to the prime minister—a position not directly elected by the populace—are seen as a blatant violation of those constitutional principles. This raises deep questions about the legitimacy of governance and public trust.
Editor: The situation has escalated with investigations against former officials. What impact do you foresee from these investigations on the ruling party?
Dr. Lee: The investigations, including travel bans and questioning of officials, could substantially weaken the ruling party’s standing. Public trust is paramount in any democracy, and the perception of a government that resorts to militaristic measures can lead to political fragmentation. As we see with the National Police Agency’s assertive stance, there is a clear willingness to investigate all parties involved, which could unearth deeper issues of governance and lead to greater political mobilization among opposition factions.
Editor: Opposition leaders are urging for immediate action against Yoon. What are the practical implications if such actions are taken?
Dr. Lee: Shoudl the opposition successfully impeach President Yoon, it could set a precedent for political accountability in South Korea. This may invigorate democratic processes but could also lead to a prolonged period of instability. The interim transfer of power to the prime minister, while constitutionally grounded, raises questions about the political legitimacy of that leadership, potentially igniting further protests from Yoon’s supporters.
Editor: Given the current circumstances, what advice would you give to citizens concerned about their democracy?
Dr. Lee: Citizens should remain vigilant and engaged in the political process. Participation in democratic advocacy, whether through peaceful protests, online forums, or even in discussions with local representatives, is crucial.It’s essential for the electorate to hold their leaders accountable while pushing for transparent governance, ensuring that the principles of democracy are upheld. Being informed and participating in civic discussions can empower individuals to protect their democratic rights.
Editor: thank you, Dr. Lee, for your insights.The implications of these events are profound and will affect not just the political landscape in South Korea but could serve as a cautionary tale for other democracies worldwide.
Dr. Lee: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these critical issues. The world is watching, and how South Korea navigates this crisis will resonate far beyond its borders.