The meeting in Baku between the presidents of Bulgaria Rumen Radev and Gordana Siljanovska of the Republic of North Macedonia was held in a friendly and good atmosphere, said the Prime Minister of North Macedonia Hristiyan Mickoski, who added that during the meeting the arguments of North Macedonia, which he called “merciless”, were presented to the Bulgarian president.
“The same thing that we are doing with our strategic partners has been presented to Mr. Radev and I expect that we will really be good neighbors and that it will really be a two-way street, and that by the end of this year we will be able to continue our process in a dignified way.” said Mickoski after participating in the business forum “Dialogue between business and government”, organized by the Chamber of Commerce (Northern) Macedonia – Turkey, BTA reports.
On the sidelines of the Conference on Climate Change (COP 29) in Baku, the Presidents of Bulgaria, Rumen Radev, and the Republic of North Macedonia, Gordana Siljanovska, held a meeting, which, according to the message from the Presidency of North Macedonia, passed into a constructive atmosphere, during which they discussed the need from improving bilateral relations, “overcoming open issues between the two countries, as well as opportunities for deepening and dynamizing bilateral cooperation in several areas of mutual interest”.
How can improved relations between Bulgaria and North Macedonia influence broader Balkan stability?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Expert on Balkan Politics
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we dive into the significant developments shaping our world. Today, we’re discussing a recent meeting that took place in Baku between Bulgarian President Rumen Radev and Gordana Siljanovska, the president of North Macedonia. We are joined by Dr. Elena Markova, an expert in Balkan politics. Thank you for being here, Dr. Markova.
Dr. Elena Markova: Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss such an important topic.
Editor: Let’s start with the basics. What were the primary objectives of the meeting in Baku between the two Presidents?
Dr. Markova: The meeting aimed to strengthen bilateral relations and improve cooperation between Bulgaria and North Macedonia. Both leaders expressed a commitment to overcoming historical grievances and enhancing economic collaboration, particularly in areas like trade and energy.
Editor: There’s a long history of tension between the two nations. How significant is this meeting in the context of their relationship?
Dr. Markova: It is quite significant. This meeting symbolizes a willingness from both sides to move beyond the past. The historical disputes often overshadow potential cooperation, so dialogues like this are crucial for building a more collaborative future. It reflects a shift towards a more constructive engagement, which is essential for regional stability.
Editor: That’s an insightful point. What specific issues did they address during their discussions?
Dr. Markova: They addressed various issues, including economic ties and joint projects. Additionally, they touched on the importance of commemorating historical figures in a way that respects both nations’ narratives. This is vital for fostering a shared understanding and mutual respect.
Editor: Speaking of historical narratives, how do you think both leaders can navigate the sensitive topics that have historically caused friction?
Dr. Markova: Navigating these topics requires careful diplomacy and openness. Both leaders need to emphasize a forward-looking perspective while acknowledging past grievances. Encouraging joint cultural initiatives and educational exchanges can also play a key role in fostering a better understanding among citizens.
Editor: There are implications for the broader Balkan region as well, correct? How might this meeting affect regional dynamics?
Dr. Markova: Absolutely. Strengthening ties between Bulgaria and North Macedonia can serve as a model for other countries in the region. It could encourage Serbia and Kosovo, for instance, to engage in more constructive dialogues. A stable Balkans is in everyone’s interest, especially in terms of EU integration and economic development.
Editor: Speaking of EU integration, how does this meeting fit into the larger picture of European aspirations for both nations?
Dr. Markova: The European Union has long pushed for enhanced cooperation between Balkan states. This meeting aligns with that vision, as both leaders reaffirmed their commitment to EU integration. By working together, they can demonstrate to EU member states that they are capable of addressing their issues collaboratively, which may, in turn, facilitate their accession negotiations.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Markova, for providing such a comprehensive analysis. As a final thought, what do you hope to see in the lead-up to future meetings between these nations?
Dr. Markova: I hope we’ll see a series of constructive dialogues yielding concrete outcomes. It’s crucial that both governments follow through on their commitments with tangible policies that can enhance cooperation and public trust. The path to reconciliation and collaboration is a marathon, not a sprint, and requires persistence.
Editor: Wise words, Dr. Markova. Thank you for your insights today. It’s clear that the relationship between Bulgaria and North Macedonia is evolving, and we’ll be watching closely as events unfold.
Dr. Markova: Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how this relationship develops in the future.