In 2022, Oanh Yen accused Ngoc Hang Tea (right) defaulted on a 2.5 billion debt. Tra Ngoc Hang quickly retaliated. According to Tra Ngoc Hang, businessman Nguyen Quang Tan – Oanh Yen’s boyfriend borrowed 11.2 billion from the bank through Tra Ngoc Hang and then lent her 2.5 billion. Both agreed to pay interest to the bank on time before the money was disbursed. Photo: Thoi Dai Plus, FB Tra Ngoc Hang.According to Tra Ngoc Hang, after paying interest for 2 months, Oanh Yen’s boyfriend started paying interest late, so she got into bad debt with the bank, and the car she bought with a bank loan was repossessed. Tra Ngoc Hang decided not to pay 2.5 billion. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.April 2023, according to ZnewsDistrict 3 People’s Court (HCMC) has accepted the lawsuit of Mr. Nguyen Quang Tan. Model Tra Ngoc Hang Demanding 2.5 billion for loan contract dispute. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.May 2024, Tra Ngoc Hang shared on Workersthe lawsuit against her to claim 2.5 billion was dismissed by the court. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.“I also share the progress of the lawsuit for everyone to follow. I did nothing wrong so I don’t feel embarrassed about this. In the future, I will continue to update until the lawsuit has a final result. I may have been scammed out of 40 billion but I absolutely will not scam anyone out of a single penny,” Tra Ngoc Hang added. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.Recently, according to Ho Chi Minh City LawThu Duc City People’s Court opened the first instance trial of a civil case regarding a dispute over property claims. The plaintiff is a businessman. Nguyen Quang Tan sues Tra Ngoc Hang demanding compensation of 2.5 billion. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.According to the records, in 2020, Ms. Hang contacted Mr. Tan to borrow money for business. Mr. Tan gave Ms. Hang a piece of land as collateral for a total bank loan of 13.2 billion. After disbursement, Ms. Hang received the principal loan of 2.5 billion, Mr. Tan received the principal loan of 10.7 billion. The two parties agreed to pool the interest to pay the bank, but after a while, Ms. Hang did not pay the interest as agreed, leading to litigation. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.During the process of resolving the case, Ms. Hang submitted a document as evidence to prove her statement that there was an agreement between Mr. Tan and Ms. Hang, in which Mr. Tan promised to settle the bad debt and buy a car for Ms. Hang. Specifically, in the event that Mr. Tan could not pay interest to the bank, causing Ms. Hang to have bad debt at the bank, Ms. Hang would not pay the debt or interest on the amount of 2.5 billion. The panel of judges reviewed the entire content of the above document and did not see the agreement as Ms. Hang stated. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.The panel of judges determined that, regarding the loan, both parties confirmed that Mr. Tan completed the procedures for Ms. Hang to legalize the loan of 13.2 billion with the bank. Pursuant to Articles 91 and 92 of the Civil Procedure Code, Article 166 of the Civil Procedure Code, the panel of judges determined that Mr. Tan was the one who actually paid the loan of 13.2 billion to the bank, Ms. Hang received 2.5 billion of the loan of 13.2 billion and Mr. Tan had the right to claim back the 2.5 billion. The panel of judges accepted all of Mr. Tan’s lawsuit requests, forcing Ms. Hang to return the 2.5 billion to Mr. Tan. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.Watch video: “Tra Ngoc Hang with her daughter”. Source: FB Tra Ngoc Hang
In 2022, Oanh Yen accused Ngoc Hang Tea (right) defaulted on a 2.5 billion debt. Tra Ngoc Hang quickly retaliated. According to Tra Ngoc Hang, businessman Nguyen Quang Tan – Oanh Yen’s boyfriend borrowed 11.2 billion from the bank through Tra Ngoc Hang and then lent her 2.5 billion. Both agreed to pay interest to the bank on time before the money was disbursed. Photo: Thoi Dai Plus, FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
According to Tra Ngoc Hang, after paying interest for 2 months, Oanh Yen’s boyfriend started paying interest late, so she got into bad debt with the bank, and the car she bought with a bank loan was repossessed. Tra Ngoc Hang decided not to pay 2.5 billion. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
April 2023, according to ZnewsDistrict 3 People’s Court (HCMC) has accepted the lawsuit of Mr. Nguyen Quang Tan. Model Tra Ngoc Hang Demanding 2.5 billion for loan contract dispute. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
May 2024, Tra Ngoc Hang shared on Workersthe lawsuit against her to claim 2.5 billion was dismissed by the court. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
“I also share the progress of the lawsuit for everyone to follow. I did nothing wrong so I don’t feel embarrassed about this. In the future, I will continue to update until the lawsuit has a final result. I may have been scammed out of 40 billion but I absolutely will not scam anyone out of a single penny,” Tra Ngoc Hang added. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
Recently, according to Ho Chi Minh City LawThu Duc City People’s Court opened the first instance trial of a civil case regarding a dispute over property claims. The plaintiff is a businessman. Nguyen Quang Tan sues Tra Ngoc Hang demanding compensation of 2.5 billion. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
According to the records, in 2020, Ms. Hang contacted Mr. Tan to borrow money for business. Mr. Tan gave Ms. Hang a piece of land as collateral for a total bank loan of 13.2 billion. After disbursement, Ms. Hang received the principal loan of 2.5 billion, Mr. Tan received the principal loan of 10.7 billion. The two parties agreed to pool the interest to pay the bank, but after a while, Ms. Hang did not pay the interest as agreed, leading to litigation. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
During the process of resolving the case, Ms. Hang submitted a document as evidence to prove her statement that there was an agreement between Mr. Tan and Ms. Hang, in which Mr. Tan promised to settle the bad debt and buy a car for Ms. Hang. Specifically, in the event that Mr. Tan could not pay interest to the bank, causing Ms. Hang to have bad debt at the bank, Ms. Hang would not pay the debt or interest on the amount of 2.5 billion. The panel of judges reviewed the entire content of the above document and did not see the agreement as Ms. Hang stated. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
The panel of judges determined that, regarding the loan, both parties confirmed that Mr. Tan completed the procedures for Ms. Hang to legalize the loan of 13.2 billion with the bank. Pursuant to Articles 91 and 92 of the Civil Procedure Code, Article 166 of the Civil Procedure Code, the panel of judges determined that Mr. Tan was the one who actually paid the loan of 13.2 billion to the bank, Ms. Hang received 2.5 billion of the loan of 13.2 billion and Mr. Tan had the right to claim back the 2.5 billion. The panel of judges accepted all of Mr. Tan’s lawsuit requests, forcing Ms. Hang to return the 2.5 billion to Mr. Tan. Photo: FB Tra Ngoc Hang.
Watch video: “Tra Ngoc Hang with her daughter”. Source: FB Tra Ngoc Hang