Parliament dismissed President Yoon Suk Yeol after a failed attempt to institute martial law

South Korea‘s parliament dismissed President Yoon Suk Yeol on Saturdayfor ‍his failed attempt to institute martial law on December 3, which opened an‍ unprecedented ‌political crisis in the country‍ and gave rise ⁢to massive demonstrations.

“I feel deeply frustrated⁤ (…) but now I⁢ have to ‌step aside for a while”ousted President Yoon‍ said.In a televised ‌speech he ⁤called⁢ for‍ the end ⁢of ‌ “politics of excess and comparison”.

Out of a total of 300​ deputies present in the Chamber, 204 voted in favor of removing the president⁤ for insurrection and 85 voted against, according to the results ⁢announced by the presidency of the Chamber.

Thousands of protesters celebrated​ Parliament’s decision ⁣in the streets. Photo:⁣ EFE

Likewise, there ​were three abstentions‌ and ‌eight⁢ null​ votes in this new motion​ of ​censure, accepted after a ⁢first one presented ‍by‌ the opposition on December 7th which failed.

Yoon is‌ now suspended, waiting for the Constitutional Court to ⁤validate ‌his dismissal​ or not. ⁣You ⁣have 180 days to do so.

If the Court ​confirms his dismissal, he would be the second president in South Korea’s history to end up like this, after the case of leader Park ‍Geun-hye in ‌2017.

Though, ⁢there is also a precedent in which the impeachment approved ⁤by parliament was invalidated two months later by the Constitutional court, that of President Roh⁣ Moo-hyun in 2004.

Simultaneously occurring, Prime Minister Han⁣ Duck-soo will take over as acting‍ president of the country and‌ promised to exercise “stable government”.

South Korean Prime minister Han ⁤Duck-soo will ‍take over as interim president. Photo: EFE

at least 200,000 ‍protesters, according ⁢to ⁢police, gathered in front of ‌Parliament awaiting the ⁣result and celebrated the ⁣impeachment, the agency​ reported.‌ AFP. In another part of the capital Seoul,around 30,000 ⁤people gathered ⁤to support the president.

South Korea: Why Yoon Suk Yeol⁣ was fired

President Yoon, 63 years old ‍and with low popularity ‍numbers, surprised the country by announcing the ‍imposition of martial law on the night of ⁣December 3 and sending the ⁤army​ into Parliament to⁢ prevent‍ deputies from meeting.

The president, engaged in a conflict with the opposition over ‌the ‌budget, accused his political rivals of behaving like “anti-state forces” ​and said that with this extreme measure he was trying to protect the country from the “threats” of the communist regime. of South Korea.

The decision ⁣sparked a movement of indignation,with thousands of protesters instantly mobilizing‍ and ⁤confronting the⁤ military at the ‍doors‌ of Parliament.

The deputies ‍managed to meet and within a few hours with their vote ⁤they annulled ⁢the ‍martial law.

What factors contributed to the dismissal of President Yoon Suk Yeol by ⁣South ‍Korea’s ‌Parliament?

Interview Between Time.News ⁣Editor ⁤and Political Analyst Dr.Lee Joon

Time.News Editor: good afternoon, Dr. Lee.⁢ Thank‍ you for joining us today. The recent dismissal of⁣ President yoon Suk Yeol by⁤ South Korea’s Parliament has sent shockwaves through the political landscape. Can you break down what led to this unprecedented decision?

Dr. Lee Joon: Good afternoon, and thank you for having me. Absolutely, this situation is quite complex. President Yoon was dismissed primarily due to ‌his controversial attempt to implement martial law during a national⁢ crisis. This move was seen by many as an overreach of power and led to widespread protests against his administration, ⁤culminating in this political crisis.

Time.News ​Editor: It sounds like a culmination⁣ of discontent.⁣ In his televised speech after the dismissal, President Yoon expressed frustration and called for an end to what he termed “politics of excess and comparison.” How do you interpret this statement in the context of South Korea’s political climate?

Dr. Lee Joon: Yoon’s statement reflects a deep acknowledgment of public sentiment. His administration has⁣ faced significant​ backlash for perceived mishandling of various issues, and ⁤he seems to recognize that the hyper-partisan climate in South korea has not served the public well. However,it’s also a somewhat defensive stance,as it shifts the focus from his administration’s failures​ to a broader critique ⁢of ‍political behaviour in the country.

Time.News Editor: The numbers are striking; 204​ out of 300 deputies voted for his removal. What​ does this political shift signify for the future of ⁣governance in South Korea?

Dr. Lee joon: The significant majority against him indicates⁢ a strong⁤ consensus among lawmakers that such‌ leadership was unacceptable. This ⁤decision could lead ⁣to a re-evaluation of leadership styles moving forward. It might pave the‍ way for a more collaborative and clear political environment, especially if new leaders prioritize accountability​ and the public’s trust.

Time.News Editor: There‍ have been massive⁣ demonstrations following‌ his ‍ousting.What⁣ role do you think public protests will play in shaping the ‍future of South ‌Korean politics?

Dr. Lee Joon: Public protests have always been a potent force in‍ South Korean politics, and I expect that to continue.⁣ These demonstrations signal a⁢ demand for accountability and change. They can ⁢serve as a ‌reminder to future administrations that the populace⁤ is vigilant and willing to mobilize against perceived injustices. This active civic engagement could ⁤foster ⁢a more democratic and responsive political atmosphere.

Time.News Editor: ‍What are⁤ the potential implications for international relations, particularly regarding how ⁢South Korea is perceived by its allies ⁤and adversaries?

Dr. Lee Joon: Well, the dismissal of a president ​can create a temporary perception of instability. Allies⁢ may be concerned about south korea’s internal conflicts affecting its strategic positions, notably ​relating to North Korea and trade relations. However, if the transition is managed effectively, particularly with a focus ⁣on stable, democratic governance, it could ultimately strengthen South Korea’s position internationally, ⁢highlighting its commitment to democratic principles.

Time.News editor: Thank you, Dr. Lee, for your insights. As⁢ south Korea navigates‌ this turbulent political landscape, it​ will be interesting to observe how the new leaders‌ respond to public sentiment and ⁢the challenges ahead.

Dr. Lee Joon: ⁢Thank you for having me. The coming months will be crucial and certainly engaging to follow.