The judicial election will take center stage in 2025, so the parties will be relegated to the background, but they will enjoy 7 billion weights of public financing.
The decree of judicial reform, In force since September 16, it indicates that the National Electoral Institute (INE) must organize the elections of ministers, magistrates and judges, whose voting day will be held next June 1st.
A section of the document indicates that the parties will not have any kind of interference in the choice of judges, so it is ordered that they not even have a seat at the table of General Council.
In turn, on that same date municipal elections will only be held in Durango y Veracruz, Therefore it is not considered an election year.
Because it was confirmed that the PRD lost the registration, the six parties will share 7 billion 402 thousand 870 pesos.
On August 23, the General Council approved a global figure of 7,354 million pesos for the parties, but left the individual amount pending because it has not yet been published in the Official Journal of the Federation (DOF) the declaration of loss of registration of the PRD.
Of this amount, 210 million pesos are for specific activities, 140 million pesos for postal franchise and 693 thousand for the telegraph.
According to an estimate of the amounts they will receive for ordinary activities, Morena will be the most benefited, with around 2.5 billion pesos next year.
He PAN It will be the second party with the most money next year, with resources that would exceed 1,230 million pesos, while the PRI would be left with just under 950 million, which will be a burden, since for years it has received a figure higher than what it will be granted in 2025.
Citizen Movement would have around 920 million pesos, which would mean growth compared to what it received in past years.
In turn, the PVEM would be close to reaching 800 million pesos of prerogatives, while the PT would be left with more than 630 million pesos.
The formula for granting financing to political parties is established in the Constitution, Therefore, the INE is only responsible for applying it and delivering the amounts to each political force.
He following year the partisan activity will decreasesince there will be no electoral activities significant and the spotlight will be on the organization of the election of judges, magistrates and ministers that will be carried out by mandate of the judicial reform.
The judicial reform mandates that “the counselors of the Legislative Branch and the representatives of the political parties before the General Council They will not be able to participate in the actions, activities and sessions related to this process.”
Last week, the INE approved reforms to its Session Regulations so that in which they are “held to deal with matters related to the processes to renew positions of the
Judicial Branch, the General Council will be composed solely of the President of the organization and 10 advisors, with the right to speak and vote, and the head of the Executive Secretariat, with the right to speak.
PAN will challenge in the Senate the judicial reform
Without having defined the actions to follow, the Parliamentary Group of the National Action Party (PAN) in the Senate decided to challenge the approved constitutional reform to Can Judicial.
According to the coordinator of the PAN senators, Guadalupe Murguía, “after a broad analysis, the Parliamentary Group of the National Action Party (GPPAN) decided to challenge, through various legal actions, the form and substance of the Judicial Reform approved in the Senate.”
However, he clarified that at the time they will have to define these actions, “in order to request the invalidity of the Judicial Reform of the Government”.
He said that during the approval “not only were irregularities recorded in the legislative process, but it also contravenes various provisions established in the Constitution”.
He explained that, among the main procedural reasons, there is the violation of the suspension of protection orders of various federal courts that prevented their discussion and voting, as well as the lack of chance to open forums and discussion spaces that would allow for an in-depth study of the reform.
“During the discussion in the Chamber of DeputiesThere was an irregular change of venue, which resulted in a lack of certainty for the vote of the legislators, since it was not carried out in accordance with the Law.”
For this reason, he considered that the approval of the reform violated the rights of indigenous peoples and communities since modifications were made to their electoral regulations, without carrying out a consultation regarding article 2 of the Constitution.Karina Aguilar
Related
2024-09-24 10:26:47