Illustration of the 2024 Regional election. Photo: dok.JPNN.com
jpnn.comJAKARTA – Spokesperson for the DPP PSI I Putu Yoga Saputra believes that PDIP‘s claims regarding victory in the 14 regional elections at the provincial level are inaccurate. The reason is, there are several important details that were not disclosed.
“If they were the supporting party, maybe they would win in 14 provinces. But try checking the candidates, are they all PDIP cadres? “Candidates in South papua and Bangka Belitung, for example, are not PDIP cadres,” said Yoga in a written statement, Sunday (1/12).
In South Papua, the speedy count results show that the winner is the pair Apolo Safanpo and Paskalis imadawa.
“We know that Mr Apolo is a professional, not a party person. “Meanwhile, Pak Paskalis is a member of PSI,” said Yoga.
In Bangka Belitung, he continued, the couple who won the quick count version were Hidayat Arsani and Hellyana.
“Mr. Hidayat is a senior politician from the Golkar Party, while Mrs. Hellyana is the chairman of the Bangka Belitung PPP DPW,” continued Yoga.
Apart from that, PDIP claims to have won the Central Kalimantan gubernatorial election. In fact, the quick count results for this election cannot be used as a reference because the vote difference is very narrow.
“There are survey institutions that say the pair Nadalsyah and Supian hadi are superior, there are also those who say the pair Agustiar Sabran and edy Pratowo won. The difference in their votes is very small. “So, PDIP should not include Central Kalimantan in the victory list,” concluded Yoga.
PSI I DPP Spokesperson Putu Yoga Saputra highlighted a number of important details that the PDIP Secretary General did not reveal in his statement regarding victory in the 14 regional elections
What strategies is PSI implementing to appeal to voters in the evolving political landscape of Indonesia?
Interview with I Putu Yoga Saputra, Spokesperson for DPP PSI: A Deep Dive into the 2024 Regional Elections
In this engaging conversation with I Putu Yoga Saputra, we explore the recent claims made by PDIP regarding their victories in the 2024 regional elections, uncovering important details and implications for the political landscape in Indonesia.
Q: Thank you for joining us, I Putu Yoga Saputra. Let’s dive right into it. You’ve stated that PDIP’s claims of victory in the 14 provincial elections are inaccurate. What led you to this conclusion?
A: Thank you for having me. Our assertion is based on the analysis of the candidates and the actual results from these elections. While PDIP may claim to have a stronghold,the reality on the ground is different. As an example, in South Papua, the winning pair—Apolo Safanpo and Paskalis Imadawa—does not include PDIP members. Apolo is a professional, not affiliated with any party, while Paskalis is from PSI.This lack of portrayal raises important questions about PDIP’s claims.
Q: You also mentioned the situation in Bangka Belitung. Could you elaborate on that?
A: Absolutely.The winning candidates in bangka Belitung, Hidayat Arsani and Hellyana, come from other political backgrounds—Hidayat is a senior politician from Golkar Party, and Hellyana chairs the Bangka Belitung PPP DPW. PDIP cannot claim victories in regions where their candidates are not at the forefront.This points to a broader trend where local parties and autonomous candidates are gaining traction over established parties.
Q: What are your thoughts on PDIP’s claim regarding the Central Kalimantan gubernatorial election?
A: PDIP’s claim is problematic as the quick count results indicate a very narrow voting difference. Various survey institutions have reported differing winners, and given the slim margins, it’s premature for PDIP to declare victory. We believe that these nuances should be transparently communicated to the public,as they can substantially affect voter perception and trust.
Q: This certainly sheds light on the competitive dynamics of Indonesian politics. What implications do you see for future elections,especially for political parties like PSI?
A: this election cycle illustrates that voters are becoming more discerning and are increasingly favoring candidates based on merit rather than party affiliation. for parties like PSI, this is an opportunity. We aim to continue championing transparency and candidate qualifications, focusing on issues that resonate with the electorate. The evolving political landscape may lead to more independent candidates gaining seats, reshaping the traditional party allegiance among voters.
Q: For our readers who are keen to understand how these elections affect them directly, what practical advice would you give based on these insights?
A: I encourage readers to critically assess the candidates in their regions beyond party labels. Engage with the political process by researching candidates’ qualifications and their platforms. Understanding who is truly representing your interests can empower voters, fostering a more representative political landscape. Stay informed and participate actively in your local elections; your voice matters now more than ever.
Q: Thank you, I Putu Yoga Saputra, for sharing your insights with us today. Is there anything else you’d like to add?
A: Thank you for the opportunity. I urge everyone to continue following these elections closely. It’s essential for us all to demand transparency and accountability from our leaders. Together, we can ensure a healthier democratic process in Indonesia.
This insightful interview not only clarifies the current political climate in Indonesia but also serves as a reminder of the importance of informed voting and political participation.