Plaza Mall Construction: Ex-Officials Condemned for Lack of Studies

Former Comas mayor and Officials Convicted in Mall Plaza Corruption Scandal

A Lima Norte court has condemned former Comas Mayor Miguel Saldaña and four ex-municipal officials for irregularities surrounding the 2017 construction of mall plaza Comas, confirming long-held suspicions of corruption and improper influence. The case,brought by the Prosecutor’s Office Anticorruption of Lima norte,reveals a pattern of circumventing legal requirements and accepting questionable donations.

The investigation, wich concluded recently, demonstrated that Mall Plaza Real Estate SA secured urban authorization and a building license in an expedited manner, without submitting the legally mandated technical studies on environmental and road impact. This omission raised immediate concerns about the project’s potential consequences for the surrounding community and infrastructure.

Did you know? – Peru’s anti-corruption prosecutor’s office has increased its focus on construction projects in recent years, citing the sector’s vulnerability to illicit activities due to large contracts and complex regulations.

Irregular Approvals and Suspicious Donations

According to the Prosecutor’s Office, the municipality’s actions were deeply compromised. The investigation revealed that the company received approvals from key officials despite lacking essential documentation. Specifically,Jorge Avalos,former sub-manager of urban planning,approved the urban authorization,while Juan Amésquita,former head of private works,authorized the construction license. Lourdes Sánchez and Alejandro Odar, former municipal services officials, allegedly issued reports that actively favored the company’s submission.

Adding to the concerns, the municipality accepted a donation of 200 tons of rocks intended for work on the Chillón River. This donation, investigators found, further evidenced irregularities in the approval process and suggested a quid pro quo arrangement.

Pro tip: – When evaluating public projects, look for adherence to required environmental and impact assessments. Missing documentation can signal potential irregularities and a lack of due diligence.

Reduced Sentences and Disqualifications

Initially facing a four-year prison sentence, Saldaña and the other convicted officials will instead serve 208 days of community work. All five individuals have been disqualified from holding public office for a period of five years.They have also been ordered to collectively pay S/ 40,000 in civil reparation to the State.

The prosecution’s case was bolstered by technical reports from the Ministry of Housing, the Ministry of Environment, and the Municipality of lima, as well as testimony from specialized witnesses. Provincial deputy prosecutor Anita Jesús Monteza Vásquez played a key role in building the case and securing the convictions.

Broader Implications for Clarity

This case underscores the ongoing challenges of ensuring transparency and accountability in Peru’s construction and development sectors. The swift approval process and the acceptance of donations raise questions about the oversight mechanisms in place and the potential for undue influence. While the penalties may appear lenient to some, the convictions themselves represent a notable step toward combating corruption and upholding the rule of law.

.

The convictions send a clear message that those who abuse their positions of power will be held accountable, even if the consequences are not as severe as initially anticipated.

Reader question: – Do you think community service is a sufficient punishment for public officials convicted of corruption,or should penalties be more severe to deter future misconduct?