In response to the Democratic party of Korea’s proclamation that next year’s government budget plan, which reflects only reductions without increases, will be processed at the plenary session scheduled for the 2nd, the President’s Office urged on the 1st, “Please withdraw the independent processing of the budget reduction bill and proceed with the agreement on the budget plan.”
Presidential Office Spokesperson Jeong Hye-jeon held a briefing at the Yongsan Presidential Office on this day and said, “If the opposition party’s unilateral budget cuts cause problems in livelihoods, security, diplomacy, etc. and cause damage to the people, this is entirely the responsibility of the opposition party and the Democratic Party.” said.
regarding Lee Jae-myeong, leader of the Democratic Party, who said that if the government presents an amendment if an increase is needed, discussions can be held, an official from the President’s Office emphasized, “The starting point for all discussions is the withdrawal of the standalone reduction plan,” and “There is no negotiation on increase without withdrawal.” He added, “I cannot trust the sincerity of the independent budget reduction plan until it is indeed withdrawn,” and added, “We share the same position as the ruling party.”
Previously, Park Chan-dae, floor leader of the Democratic Party, announced that he would process next year’s government budget plan, which reflects only reductions without increases, at the plenary session of the National Assembly scheduled for the 2nd. The Democratic Party held a general meeting of the National Assembly’s Budget and Accounts Special Committee on the 29th of last month and independently passed an amendment that reduced 4.1 trillion won from the government budget plan (677.4 trillion won).
In response, Choo kyung-ho, floor leader of the People Power Party, urged the immediate withdrawal of the reduced budget plan, saying, “We will not engage in any further negotiations on the budget plan unless the Democratic Party first apologizes and withdraws the reduced budget plan.”
Kim Hye-rin, Donga.com reporter [email protected]
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
<button class="emotion_btn angry " data-event_name="click_content_event" data-ep_button_name="화나요" data-ep_button_area="기사콘텐츠 감정표현" data-ep_button_category="기사뷰" data-id="angry" data-label="화나요" aria-label="화나요" onclick="_spinTopEmotion(spinTopParams,'ref6');
Hot news now
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
What are the main priorities of the Democratic Party regarding the upcoming government budget in South Korea?
Interview between Time.news editor and Political Analyst Dr. Kim Su-yeon
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Kim! Thank you for joining us today. Ther’s been a notable advancement regarding the upcoming government budget plan in South Korea. The Democratic Party of Korea is pushing for a budget that emphasizes cuts without increases. Can you explain the context behind this decision?
Dr. Kim: Certainly! The Democratic Party’s focus on reducing the budget reflects thier strategy to showcase fiscal responsibility. However, there are deeper concerns tied into this approach—especially regarding the potential implications for public welfare, security, and foreign diplomacy.
Editor: The President’s Office has expressed strong opposition to this self-reliant budget reduction plan, stating that it could harm the livelihoods of the people. What’s your take on their response?
Dr. Kim: The response from the President’s Office indicates a significant tension between the ruling party and the opposition. By highlighting potential adverse effects on citizens’ lives, the ruling party aims to place the onus of accountability on the Democrats should any negative outcomes arise from budget cuts. This can be interpreted as a strategic move to rally public support against the Democratic Party.
Editor: Interesting point. Presidential Spokesperson Jeong Hye-jeon emphasized that discussions about budget increases can only occur if the democratic Party withdraws its independent reduction plan. How does this stance affect the potential for bipartisan negotiations?
Dr. Kim: This approach effectively shuts down the possibility for collaboration at the outset. By insisting on the withdrawal as a precondition, the ruling party is signaling that they currently lack trust in the opposition’s intentions.This could lead to a deadlock, especially if neither party is willing to compromise on such a fundamental aspect of the budget.
Editor: We see a lot of partisan conflict around budgetary issues. Historically, how have budget negotiations unfolded in South Korea? Are there precedents for this kind of stalemate?
Dr. Kim: Yes, South Korean politics have a history of intense budget negotiations marked by both collaboration and conflict. In times of economic difficulty, especially, one might recall instances where bipartisan efforts emerged, but those were usually fueled by external pressures or crises.However, when one party attempts unilateral cuts, as we’re witnessing now, it often leads to infighting and gridlock.
Editor: Lee Jae-myeong, the leader of the Democratic Party, mentioned that discussions could be held if the government presents an amendment. What does this suggest about the opposition’s strategy?
Dr. kim: Lee’s remarks indicate an openness to dialogue, but they also serve as a tactical maneuver to project a more reasonable image to the electorate. By suggesting amendments, he attempts to keep the door open for negotiation while also making a stand against what they perceive as unilateral action from the ruling party. However, it all hinges on weather the ruling party sees this as genuine or simply a political tactic.
Editor: It sounds like the situation is quite complex and may continue to evolve. If the current impasse continues, what do you see as the potential consequences for both parties and the public?
Dr. Kim: If this budget conflict persists without resolution, we could see significant public backlash. Citizens may feel the strain of potential cuts to funding for essential services, and this could lead to discontent with the Democratic Party for not cooperating in a time of need. For the ruling party, failure to address public concerns could erode their support as well. Ultimately, it highlights the crucial need for effective dialogue and cooperation in governance, especially in turbulent times.
editor: Thank you, Dr. Kim,for your insights.It truly seems clear that the road ahead will be challenging, influenced by both political strategies and public sentiment. we appreciate your time and expertise on this matter!
Dr. Kim: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss these significant issues!