LONDON, January 19, 2026 – Prince Harry appeared visibly distressed as he testified against the publisher of the Daily Mail tabloid, alleging years of unlawful information gathering that he said has caused immense pain to himself and his family. The prince, at times on the verge of tears, stated, “They continue to come after me, they have made my wife’s life an absolute misery,” during his testimony in London’s High Court.
Royal revelation: Harry Details Media Battle
The Duke of Sussex alleges decades of privacy violations by Associated Newspapers Ltd., mirroring a similar case against the publisher of the Daily Mirror.
- Prince Harry and six other public figures accuse Associated Newspapers Ltd. of systematic unlawful information gathering.
- Harry described feeling “paranoid beyond belief” due to intrusions by the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday.
- The prince linked the press’s actions to the death of his mother, Princess Diana, and the couple’s decision to step back from royal duties.
- He stated he simply wanted an apology from the publisher.
Harry is among seven prominent figures – including singer sir Elton John and actor Elizabeth Hurley – who claim Associated Newspapers Ltd.engaged in “clear, systematic and sustained use of unlawful information gathering” over two decades, according to attorney David Sherborne. The publisher denies the allegations, calling them “preposterous” and asserting that the roughly 50 articles in question were based on information from willing sources close to the individuals involved. The publisher intends to reveal these sources during the nine-week trial.
During his testimony, Harry recounted a specific instance where a Mail on Sunday article revealed he had been at a private club, despite no public record of his attendance. He suggested the information was obtained through unlawful means, pointing to the paper’s history of using “unidentified source” to conceal unlawful investigative methods. “If you complain, they double down on you in my experience,” he explained, detailing why he hadn’t previously objected to the articles.
Harry described an “uneasy” relationship with the media, shaped by the royal family’s long-held protocol of “never complain, never explain.”
Echoes of the Past
The litigation stems from Harry’s broader mission to reform the media, which he holds responsible for the 1997 death of his mother, Princess Diana, who died in a car crash in Paris while being pursued by paparazzi. He also cited persistent press attacks on his wife, Meghan, Duchess of sussex, as a key factor in their decision to leave royal life and relocate to the United States in 2020.
Harry characterized the press coverage of Meghan as “vicious persistent attacks,” harassment, and even racist, stating that these factors inspired him to break with family tradition and pursue legal action.
Following cross-examination, Harry’s lawyer asked for his reaction to the publisher’s defense. Despite initiating the lawsuit and seeking a trial for accountability, Harry expressed that it was “fundamentally wrong to put all of us through this again,” stating that all he desired was an apology. “I have never believed that my life is open season to be commercialised by these people,” he said.
After referencing his wife, who is not a party in the case, Harry’s voice broke, and he appeared to fight back tears as he left the witness box and slowly exited the courtroom.
The morning’s headlines in 90 seconds, including serious weather sends a slip onto a house, and Trump speaks about using force to take over Greenland. (Source: 1News)
Regarding the question “What kind of evidence is being presented in this case?”:
Based on the article, the evidence being presented includes:
* Specific articles published by the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday that the plaintiffs (Harry and others) allege contain information obtained unlawfully.
* Harry’s testimony detailing instances where he believes his privacy was violated and how the information was likely obtained.
* **The publisher’s
