2024-07-21 23:20:12
The psychologist accused and regretted the morbidness of some people and the media in the treatment of her complaint.
A few days ago, part of the statements he issued were leaked. Raphael of Jerome between the investigation into alleged sexual abuse against the actor Christian Campos.
Seeing that her statements were quickly spread, the psychologist decided to share a statement where she was clear in expressing her rejection of the disclosure of these details.
“This is not just about me. It’s just not done… And it’s not done with anyone,” the 46-year-old woman began by saying.
Raffaella di Girolamo’s outburst after details of her statement against Cristian Campos were released
At the beginning of her writing, which was published through her Instagram, Raffaella di Girolamo said that “I assumed the re-victimization when I reported, I take responsibility for that, only that There is another group of people who have not been invited and who have felt they have the right to say, speak, give their opinion, speculate and have a party.”
After this, he declared that “after everything that has happened, It seems that there are those who still do not understand what revictimization means. Worse still: people, in this case, with power in the field of communications.”
It was there that the writer also questioned: “Could it be that they, or they, do not care about the victims? “Where is the responsibility of those who decide to cross boundaries that do not even belong to them?”
Along the same lines, Di Girolamo accused that “they see you as an adult, but they don’t realize that they are talking about a child. A girl who was the victim of very serious acts; a girl who still lives inside me.”
“Did these people really sit down to read the statement I made before the court, as if this act of transgression were harmless? Each person selected the paragraph that best served their dark interests. Is it not for morbid reasons? Does anyone doubt how sordid it is to break into another person’s history by spreading it?” lamented the psychologist.
On this point, Raffaella stressed that there was no need to provide further information regarding her complaint.
“Did you need details?” “Why do they encourage conversations about wounds and traumas that do not belong to them? Why describe child sexual abuse in detail?” were some of the questions she put forward.
“Sordidness. “I can’t think of another word to describe the negligence, the harm, and the fear felt by every person who could identify with my story,” she said, venting.
Finally, Claudia di Girolamo’s daughter questioned the true intention and purpose of some media outlets: “To demonstrate their power? To gain clicks? Likes?”
