Manila, December 29, 2025 – A pervasive sense of resignation hangs over the Philippines as the year draws to a close, even as a massive corruption scandal continues to unfold with few signs of resolution.
A Nation accustomed to “Getting By”
Despite widespread poverty and allegations of billions lost to corruption, a deeply ingrained cultural acceptance of hardship persists.
- Over 50 percent of the Filipino population lives below the poverty line.
- A meaningful corruption scandal involving taxpayer funds remains unresolved.
- A culture of accepting aid, even from politicians, perpetuates a cycle of dependency.
- Questions arise about whether relief efforts hinder long-term systemic change.
Filipinos are frequently enough described as a forgiving and patient people, a trait perhaps born of necessity. many make do with limited resources, finding contentment in simple things. When the Palace suggested a modest Noche Buena-a traditional Christmas Eve feast-could be enjoyed for just P500, many accepted it, content to simply “get by.” This “bahala na” (come what may) attitude, coupled with a belief that divine providence or charitable individuals will provide, is deeply embedded in the national psyche.
But how much can a nation endure? More than half the population lives below the poverty line, yet even in the face of a scandal involving billions of pesos in misappropriated funds-funds reportedly stashed in basements-a sense of quiet acceptance prevails. When health crises arise, citizens often turn to local politicians for financial assistance, a practice that underscores the systemic failures plaguing the country.
Patronage
The prevailing patronage system-where support is exchanged for favors-remains a significant obstacle to progress. As long as ngos, private individuals, and charitable organizations continue to provide temporary aid, many Filipinos seem resigned to the status quo, simply stating, “Nakakaraos naman,” or “We get by.”
The question of responsibility arises. While charitable giving is often rooted in religious or moral principles, isn’t it ultimately the government’s duty to provide for its citizens, using the taxes they pay? Many feel they are being exploited-taxed to fund corruption, then forced to contribute to relief efforts that should be the government’s responsibility.
When personal disasters strike,even those who are normally self-reliant often find themselves seeking assistance from politicians,mirroring the plight of the less lucky. This feels like a double jeopardy. Shouldn’t the government prioritize providing decent wages and living conditions for all, a goal that would be achievable if public funds weren’t diverted?
Remaining silent, some argue, is complicity. It’s time to demand accountability and insist that taxes are used to serve the population, especially those most in need. Perhaps, a complete cessation of aid during disasters would force the government to address its failures and demonstrate its commitment to its citizens.
Public office, at its core, is a public trust-not an prospect for personal enrichment or the perpetuation of political dynasties. Elected officials should serve their constituents, not the other way around.
The hope for real change lingers as the new year approaches.
