Today, Wednesday, November 6, the morning conference of judges and magistrates of the Judiciary; still live the minute by minute of YouTube streaming.
The conference will begin at 09:00 am today, November 6, and in it judges and magistrates will talk about what follows after the reform of the Judicial Branch and the election of judges were consolidated.
On Tuesday, November 5, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) It did not reach the 8 votes necessary to declare the reform of the Judiciary unconstitutional, hence The project of Minister Juan Luis González Alcántara Carrancá was rejected, that invalidated different points of said law.
The morning session of judges and magistrates takes place in the auditorium at number 1508 Avenida Revolución, in the Álvaro Obregón mayor’s office in Mexico City.
In addition, the conference is broadcast from Monday to Friday on the channel YouTube Judicial Independence MX.
Morning conference of judges: Ministers had the obligation to rule on the substance of the project
Judge Juan José Olvera pointed out that the SCJN skipped an obligatory step in the process of analyzing the project of Minister Juan Luis González Alcántara Carrancá, the review and voting on the fund.
The judge recalled a case from April 2024 where Minister Alberto Pérez Dayán maintained the inadmissibility but when the majority of the ministers indicated the admissibility of the review, they were forced to review and rule on the merits.
“Yesterday that did not happen, the 11 had the obligation to see the substance,” said the magistrate, who announced that in any case the situation could have arisen where he did not agree with the origin, but with the substance.
Morning conference of judges: SCJN resolution must be followed by the parties
Judge Juan José Olvera pointed out that the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) dismissed the unconstitutionality actions of the political parties against the reform of the Judiciary, failing to reach 8 votes to declare its invalidity.
Given this, the judge pointed out that it must be clear that this decision was attacked and today must be complied with by those who promoted it in principle.
He pointed out that the judicial reform is valid as long as its invalidity has not been declared, that is, for now, as long as its invalidity is not declared, since the amparo proceedings against it have yet to be resolved.
Morning conference of judges: Topics to be discussed today, November 6
Among the topics to be discussed at the morning conference of judges today, November 6, the judges could discuss the route to follow before the session of the SCJN.
Likewise, one could talk about whether or not there is an opportunity to reverse the law of Constitutional Supremacy, after the protections that were filed against him by different actors.
Morning conferences of judges are an exercise in reply to accusations against them
It was indicated that the morning conferences of judges and magistrates are an exercise of the right of reply 30 minutes where:
- Information will be provided on judicial cases in general and especially those related to the reform of the Judicial Branch.
- Actions of resistance to judicial reform will be communicated
- Questions from the media and reporters will be answered
- The issues related to the reform of the Judiciary that Claudia Sheinbaum announces in her town morning will be addressed.
The morning of the Judicial Branch is organized by the 1,500 federal judges and magistrates who make up the Article 41 collective.
Interview between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert on Judicial Reform
Editor: Good morning, and welcome to our special segment. Today, we’re diving into the implications of the recent developments regarding the reform of the Judiciary in Mexico. With us is Dr. Maria Lopez, a renowned legal expert with extensive experience in judicial processes. Thank you for joining us today, Dr. Lopez.
Dr. Lopez: Good morning! It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: The morning conference you attended today at the Judiciary is quite significant. Can you tell us about what you expect to come out of this conference, especially regarding the recent Supreme Court decision?
Dr. Lopez: Absolutely. Today’s conference brings together judges and magistrates to discuss the fallout from the Supreme Court’s recent refusal to declare the judicial reform unconstitutional. This is an essential meeting for assessing the next steps we should follow as a legal community. They will likely address how to implement the changes resulting from the reform and the implications of the Supreme Court’s decision.
Editor: Speaking of the Supreme Court, it was noted that the court failed to reach the necessary eight votes to declare the reform invalid. What does this mean for the legitimacy of the reform?
Dr. Lopez: That’s a critical point. The Supreme Court’s failure to invalidate the reform means it remains in effect until a ruling is reached on the amparo proceedings against it. In legal terms, the current reform is valid, and this fact imposes an obligation on all parties involved in the legal process to comply with it. The judges will discuss these compliance issues today.
Editor: Judge Juan José Olvera mentioned that the court skipped an obligatory step in reviewing the reform. How significant is this oversight?
Dr. Lopez: It’s notable. The judicial process is structured with certain protocols to ensure checks and balances. If the SCJN bypassed essential steps, it raises questions about procedural integrity and could lead to challenges down the line. Following the legal process is vital, as it upholds the rule of law—the foundation of our judiciary.
Editor: The judge also indicated potential dissent among the justices even if they would have reached a decision on the substance. How must this influence future deliberations and perceptions?
Dr. Lopez: If there are dissenting opinions among the justices, that can significantly affect future deliberations. It’s an essential part of judicial decision-making that reflects the diversity of thought within the judiciary. This dissent might also influence how political parties and the public perceive the legitimacy of the court’s decisions going forward, especially on contentious issues like judicial reform.
Editor: Today’s conference is being broadcast live on YouTube. How important is public access to these judicial discussions for promoting transparency?
Dr. Lopez: It’s incredibly important. Broadcasting these sessions serves to demystify the judicial process, allowing the public to see the inner workings of our legal system in real time. This transparency is crucial for fostering trust between the judiciary and the citizens. It also encourages accountability among judges, who know their discussions and decisions are being observed.
Editor: Lastly, what should we be watching for as these discussions unfold today?
Dr. Lopez: Pay attention to how judges outline the action steps following the Supreme Court’s decision. Additionally, look for ongoing dialogue regarding the implications of the reform and any proposed amendments that may arise from today’s discussions. This will likely shape the Judiciary’s landscape in the near future.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Lopez, for your insights. This is certainly a pivotal time for the Judiciary in Mexico, and we appreciate your expertise.
Dr. Lopez: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to discuss such important issues.
Editor: And thank you to our audience for joining us. Stay tuned for continued coverage on this topic in our upcoming segments.