“Ribera, darkness and light” exhibition at the Petit Palais: the humanity of a great Caravaggio

by time news

There ⁣is a dark legend linked to Jusepe de Ribera.‍ In⁢ 1621 his contemporary ​Giulio Mancini already‌ saw him ​as a ⁤”follower” ‍by Caravaggio ‌ “darker and fiercer”. Over the ⁤centuries, the⁤ image ⁢of an ⁤artist who delighted in scenes of martyrdom and “horrible and‌ raw things⁣ like⁤ the‌ bodies of old ⁤people” (sic), continued⁢ to be passed off by critics, until Théophile Gautier’s ⁣farewell “a fury of⁢ the brush, a ferocity of the touch, an ​intoxication ‍of⁣ blood of which‌ we⁤ have⁤ no idea”. In 1987, ⁤the⁤ very ​serious Larousse of painting still⁣ described the painter‍ as“implacable inquisitor of human deformities”. Is it time to revisit ⁢this ruling?

A world first

Discovering the retrospective‍ “Jusepe de Ribera” at the Petit Palais‍ in Paris, a completely different feeling ‌emerges: the‍ artist’s profound empathy⁢ for his most humble or vulnerable human brothers. Ardently conceived by Annick Lemoine, director of the Petit Palais, this exhibition is the first to bring⁤ together these brilliant beginnings with‌ the dazzling developments of the painter’s⁢ career in Naples, from 1616 until his‍ death in 1652. However, this panoramic vision ⁤changes our perception of the work, revealing the audacity and genius of an ‌ever-evolving artist, but also his contagious sensitivity.

Look at this beggar, holding out ⁣his cap in the first room, with his ‌eyes modestly lowered! By painting this man dressed in rags, who⁤ emerges⁤ from the shadows, with ​his face ⁢and hands caressed by a ray of ​light, the young Ribera demonstrates⁣ that he ⁤has assimilated the lesson ⁤of Caravaggio⁣ whose⁢ patrons he will ⁢seduce (Cardinal Scipione Borghese purchased this canvas). In reality‌ he is the first in Rome‌ to dare to paint such a portrait of beggars,⁣ on a ‍large format.⁣ Did he remember⁣ his humble origins, the son of a‌ shoemaker?

His ⁣gaze full of compassion can be found, twenty years ⁤later, in⁣ a splendid painting, ⁤commissioned by the Viceroy of ⁣Naples: the portrait of​ Maddalena ⁢Ventura, known as The ‌bearded woman. Depicted full-length, ⁤while breastfeeding her baby, she stares⁢ at ⁤us with a dignity that seems ⁣to discourage all sneers in⁢ advance. The clubfoot the du Louvre does nothing‍ else, parading against​ a backdrop of blue⁣ sky, with ⁢a crutch on his shoulder, and smiling at us despite his handicap! An “inclusive” ⁤painter ante litteram, Ribera here invites the viewer to⁢ charity, faithful to the message‍ of the Counter-Reformation.

Drawings of tortured people

Sometimes uncertain at first, his compositions with multiple characters ​gradually become clearer in friezes or powerful diagonals, the eloquence of​ gestures is exacerbated. Far from any ​idealization, the Spaniard draws on real models, like this ⁣old toothless‍ slave that we ​recognize here ‍ Philosopherthere as Christ’s⁣ executioner, elsewhere ​in Saint Bartholomew. Ribera ​loves ⁣worn-out bodies that he‌ elevates to the dignity of ancient sages or apostles. With presumed‌ realism, he paints ⁤Saint Jerome with flaccid⁤ and wrinkled flesh, symbol of human finiteness awakened by the promise of Salvation, in the guise ⁤of an angel with‌ a trumpet. Sometimes signing a ‌skull,‍ the artist inserts himself into these meditations…

Irresistible concentrations ‍of tears and‍ sweetness, three‍ Pietas, with Christ radiating against a background of darkness, ‍reflect, at the center of the exhibition, ⁤the absolute mastery of the Neapolitan years. Other scenes of martyrdom will follow, ⁢with marbled colors borrowed from Venetian art and almost mannerist contortions. A series of very crude ​drawings shows how Ribera was inspired by​ the executions and torture, exhibited ‍at the ⁤time ‌in public places by the ‍Spanish ⁢power and the Inquisition that reigned over Naples. Upon his arrival in this city, the artist would ‌not have hesitated to paint‌ it Saint Bartholomewon the ‌arm‍ already ​flayed by the executioner and hung it near the royal palace during a party, enjoying public success and the purchase of the painting by the viceroy.

His brushwork, however, seems less bloody than ⁤that of Caravaggio, for example,⁢ in ⁢ David holding Goliath’s head, whose (severed) neck is veiled in​ shadow. Above all, Ribera⁢ seems ‌to constantly invoke our pity, like this dog who is about to lick the hand ‍of his dying master, the handsome Adonis. Brilliant is the final rotunda which brings together ‌five ​spectacular martyrs, some of whom seem to literally fall ​off the canvas. As ‍if​ the painter was preparing to gather them in‌ his‌ arms.

Time.news Interview: Revisiting⁢ Jusepe de Ribera with Art Historian​ Dr. Elena Martinez

Time.news⁤ Editor: Welcome, Dr.⁢ Martinez! Today, we’re delving into the fascinating world of Jusepe⁤ de Ribera, an artist often shrouded in misconceptions. The⁢ recent‍ retrospective at the Petit Palais is redefining our understanding of his work. What was⁢ your ​initial⁣ takeaway from this ⁤exhibition?

Dr. ‌Elena Martinez: ​ Thank you for having me! The exhibition truly offers a fresh perspective on Ribera. Many⁣ have pigeonholed him ‍as a ‌purely morose artist obsessed with martyrdom and grotesque subjects. However, this retrospective highlights his profound empathy and ability to⁤ portray the human condition with remarkable sensitivity. It invites viewers to recognize the nuances⁤ in his⁤ work that demonstrate a genuine compassion for the marginalized and vulnerable.

Editor: That’s an​ important distinction. In the past, critics painted Ribera as a “follower” of Caravaggio, focusing on the​ darker aspects ​of⁢ his art. How does the exhibition counter‍ that‍ narrative?

Martinez: The narrative surrounding Ribera has been overly simplistic. While​ it’s true he was inspired by Caravaggio—especially with the‍ use⁣ of light and shadow—this exhibition emphasizes his evolution as an artist. For example, the portrait of the beggar holding out his cap illustrates⁤ Ribera’s willingness to confront society’s discomfort with poverty. It reflects not just the influence of Caravaggio, but a⁣ stylistic evolution towards⁢ human dignity.

Editor: You mentioned the ​portrait⁣ of⁤ Maddalena Ventura,‍ the “bearded woman.” This piece⁤ seems quite significant. Can you‍ elaborate on its⁢ importance within Ribera’s ⁢body⁢ of work?

Martinez: Certainly! Maddalena Ventura is a remarkable study in dignity and resilience. The way ​Ribera ​captures ‌her gaze ⁢invites the viewer into a ⁣dialogue about compassion and ⁣inclusion. In an era when​ physical differences⁤ were ​often met with disdain, Ribera challenges societal prejudices. This painting ⁣serves as an early example⁣ of an “inclusive” perspective in art, urging viewers to ⁣recognize humanity beyond superficial judgments.

Editor: ⁢It’s intriguing​ how ​he combines⁣ realism with a deep sense of empathy. The retrospective also showcases Ribera’s evolving compositional techniques over⁢ his career. How did these changes reflect his artistic growth?

Martinez: Ribera’s compositions indeed evolved significantly. Early on, he ‌experimented with⁢ complex multi-character arrangements, which‌ may seem ​chaotic‌ at first glance. However, as he matured, he​ mastered the use of friezes and powerful diagonals that convey emotional intensity. His‌ subjects become⁢ more streamlined ‌and focused. This ​shift not only demonstrates his technical abilities but ⁢also reveals his growing understanding of ‍how to communicate complex human emotions effectively.

Editor: ​One ⁤of the striking‌ elements ​of the exhibition is ⁢Ribera’s depictions of suffering and ⁤martyrdom.‍ Can you talk about how he used these themes?

Martinez: Ribera’s portrayal ⁢of ‌suffering isn’t gratuitous; it’s deeply philosophical. He often illustrated figures like Saint Jerome or Saint Bartholomew, opting for⁣ realistic depictions rather than idealized portrayals. ‌This approach elevates the subjects, celebrating their humanity in moments⁣ of vulnerability. By⁣ exposing their physical imperfections, Ribera invites viewers ⁣to reflect on ⁣their own mortality and the notion of salvation.

Editor: Lastly, what⁤ do you think is the lasting impact of this exhibition on the perception of Ribera’s ⁣legacy in art history?

Martinez: ​ The exhibition ​undoubtedly reshapes ⁣Ribera’s legacy. It invites scholars ⁤and viewers alike to ⁣reconsider the‌ artist’s role not just as a‍ “dark” painter, but as a ⁤compassionate ⁣observer of human existence. By showcasing his empathy and artistic evolution, ⁤it encourages a more nuanced understanding‌ of his⁢ contributions to ⁣Baroque art. I believe it will lead to an increased appreciation for ‍Ribera’s ability to ‍elevate marginalized voices in his work,​ challenging us to see beyond surface-level interpretations.

Editor: ⁣ Thank you, Dr. Martinez. Your insights shed light on how we can ⁢appreciate Ribera not just as a master of darkness but as a beacon of compassion in ​art. ‌This exhibition is a​ must-see!

Martinez: ⁢Thank‌ you for the opportunity to discuss this transformative exhibition! I hope it inspires many to explore Ribera’s work with fresh eyes.

You may also like

Leave a Comment