Riestra apologized for Spreen’s inclusion in the match against Vélez

by time news

The club Deportivo Riestra have ‍released‌ a statement​ apologizing for the inclusion of streamer Spreen (Iván Buhajeruk) in the match against Vélezan action that triggered a​ wave of criticism in Argentine football.

The club admitted that ​the⁢ marketing action, ⁢which aimed to attract the new generations⁣ through Spreen’s influence on social networks, generated many negative opinions.

In ‌his statement, Riestra explained that the decision is based on statements by Real‌ Madrid president Florentino Pérez about the decline of young audiences⁣ in European football. The club tried, with ‍the participation of Spreen, to capture those new generations who project⁤ themselves on social networks based⁤ on influencers.

the club reiterated its commitment to football and ⁢its ⁤desire to contribute positively to the growth of this sport.

“Yesterday we had the⁤ opportunity to see ​the participation of Ivan Buhajeruk, one of the most important influencers in Latin America, in the match ⁤against Vélez. Unfortunately‍ this marketing action has generated many negative opinions. “We want to extend our sincere apologies to those who felt offended,” Riestra’s statement read.

And⁤ he adds: “It was never our intention to disrespect Vélez⁢ and Argentine football in general. ⁢This situation was clarified the week ‌before the​ match by our coach, ⁢who contacted his Vélez counterpart to ‌inform him of the initiative.”

And they concluded: “We deeply appreciate the work of all the components of⁤ that beautiful ⁤activity that is football and we reaffirm our commitment towards it, trying to contribute positively to the evolution and growth of the sport we love in all its areas” .

Title: Time.News Exclusive Interview: Understanding the Controversy⁣ of Streamer⁢ Participation in Sports

Editor: Welcome to Time.News!​ Today, we’re diving ‌into an intriguing topic—the intersection of sports and digital culture. I’m thrilled to have Dr. Elena Martinez, a sports sociologist, ⁣with⁢ us to ⁢unpack the recent controversy surrounding Deportivo Riestra’s inclusion of streamer Iván ⁢Buhajeruk, better known as Spreen, in their match‍ against Vélez. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Martinez!

Dr. Martinez: Thank you for having ​me! ​This is definitely a fascinating ⁣issue at the crossroads of athletics and entertainment.

Editor: Indeed! Let’s start⁤ with the ​basics.‍ Could you share your thoughts​ on Deportivo Riestra’s decision to include a streamer in a professional match?

Dr. Martinez: Absolutely. This ‌move by Deportivo Riestra ⁢was both bold and ‌risky. On one hand, including ⁤a well-known streamer like Spreen can attract a younger audience, boost engagement, and generate buzz. However,​ it also raises questions about ⁤credibility, professionalism, ⁣and ‌the traditions that underpin sports. Fans⁣ typically expect athletes ⁤with rigorous training and skills,‍ not influencers.

Editor: ‍ That’s an‍ interesting perspective! The club ​has since issued an apology for including Spreen. What do ⁢you think motivated that decision?

Dr. Martinez: The apology suggests that the⁤ club recognized the backlash and potential damage to their reputation. Sports teams often navigate a complex relationship with ‌their fan base, and including a streamer might have felt⁢ like​ a gimmick to ‍some supporters. By⁢ apologizing, Deportivo ⁤Riestra likely ‍wanted to reaffirm its ⁣commitment to the sport and its⁤ loyal fans.

Editor: The fan’s reaction is crucial here. How⁢ do you think⁢ traditional sports ‌fans perceive ⁤the blending of gaming and sports culture?

Dr. Martinez: There’s definitely a divide. While some fans appreciate the⁢ creative mixing of cultures, others‌ feel it undermines the seriousness of the sport. It’s‌ a generational thing as well—younger fans⁢ tend⁤ to embrace the inclusion⁢ of⁢ digital influencers, while older, ‍more traditional ⁤fans often resist such changes. Clubs ⁤that wish ⁣to adapt must find a balance ⁤that respects their core audience while engaging new ones.

Editor: ⁣ What does this‌ controversy tell us ⁣about the evolution of sports in the digital age?

Dr. ⁢Martinez: ‌This incident ⁢highlights how the boundaries between sports, entertainment, and social⁢ media are​ blurring. Athletes and clubs‌ are⁤ now seeking innovative ways to connect with fans digitally. However, they ⁣must tread carefully. This evolution offers opportunities for growth, but it also requires maintaining‍ the integrity of the⁢ sport itself. ⁣It’s about striking a balance between innovation ​and tradition.

Editor: Speaking of innovation, do you see any ⁣lasting impact from this incident‌ on ‍the ​relationship between sports⁢ teams and digital influencers moving forward?

Dr. Martinez: Absolutely. This situation may‌ prompt‍ sports organizations to think more critically ⁤about partnerships with⁤ influencers. It could lead to ⁣clearer guidelines on how to incorporate digital personalities into traditional sports settings. Over time, we‌ may see a more systematic approach to these collaborations, ensuring ⁣they enhance rather than⁢ disrupt the sporting experience.

Editor: Dr. Martinez, thank you‌ for your insights! This conversation certainly sheds ⁤light on the complexities surrounding the modernization of sports and the potential pitfalls of blending different cultures.

Dr. Martinez: Thank you for having me! It’s an exciting⁣ time for sports, ⁣and I look⁢ forward to seeing how teams adapt in the future.

Editor: That’s all ⁣for today’s interview. Stay tuned for more updates on⁢ sports and culture​ from Time.News!

You may also like

Leave a Comment