Naryshkin: “Revision of nuclear doctrine reduces room for Western maneuver”
“There is virtually no way to defeat the Russian army on the battlefield.”
Sergey Naryshkin, head of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), threatened that he would definitely respond if Ukraine launched a long-range attack on his country.
In an interview with the Russian National Defense published on the 20th (local time), Director Naryshkin emphasized, “Attempts by some North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) members to promote long-range strikes with Western weapons deep into Russian territory will be punished.”
He said, “With Russian President Vladimir Putin’s approval of Russia’s revised nuclear doctrine the previous day, there has been less room for Western powers to scheme in a confrontation with Russia.” He added, “This change means that (the Ukrainian military) can better protect Russian troops on the battlefield.” “It virtually excludes the possibility of winning,” he said.
In addition, “The United States is causing problems by clinging to its waning global hegemony. “The West’s attempts to sow confusion and discord in Eurasia only strengthen our resolve to create a (new) order with Russia and its regional partners,” he said. “For Anglo-Americans, being smart and fluent in speech is no longer enough to see another reality.” It’s not enough to magically create it. “The liberal world order is losing its appeal,” he argued.
According to the revised nuclear doctrine approved the day before, the 1,000th day of the invasion of Ukraine, Russia considers it a ‘joint attack’ if there is the participation or support of a nuclear weapons state, even if the attacker is a non-nuclear weapon state.
This is in response to the recent decision by the U.S. government to use the ATACMS (Army Tactical Guided Missile System) provided to Ukraine against the Russian mainland. On the same day, the Ukrainian military fired six Atams at an armory in Karatsev, Bryansk Oblast, Russia. The Russian Ministry of Defense announced that five of them were shot down and that the remaining one also caused damage, but fragments fell into an unspecified military facility.
The following day, Storm Shadow (Scalp) long-range cruise missiles made in the UK and France were also launched in the Kursk region of mainland Russia, showing that Europe is also following the US decision.
[서울=뉴시스]
rnrn
-
- great
- 0dog
-
- I’m sad
- 0dog
-
- I’m angry
- 0dog
-
- I recommend it
- dog
Hot news now
How might Western military support for Ukraine affect geopolitical dynamics in Eastern Europe?
The statement emphasizes the escalating tensions between Russia and Western powers, particularly in light of recent military developments and Russia’s revised nuclear doctrine. The assertion suggests that any Western support in military actions against Russia, particularly those involving nuclear weapon states, could be viewed as a “joint attack” by Russia, intensifying its justification for a strong retaliatory response.
The dialog reflects a narrative of defiance against Western interventions, portraying them as futile attempts to undermine Russian influence. The speaker argues that these actions only reinforce Russia’s resolve to forge a new order in collaboration with its regional allies, framing the current geopolitical landscape as increasingly unfavorable for the West.
This rhetoric coincides with recent military activities, such as Ukraine’s use of U.S.-provided long-range missile systems against Russian assets, which further complicates the military dynamics in the region. The announcement of using these systems indicates a significant escalation in the conflict, with Western nations beginning to support Ukraine’s ability to strike deeper into Russian territory.
The situation evolves with the introduction of European-made long-range missiles being utilized similarly, signaling a united Western front in their military assistance to Ukraine. Such developments not only increase the risks of direct confrontations but also heighten the stakes involved, particularly concerning nuclear deterrence and international security considerations.
this scenario encapsulates the complexities of modern warfare where geopolitical strategies, military capabilities, and diplomatic negotiations intertwine, leading to potentially precarious consequences for global stability.