As Global Tensions Rise, These 12 Nations Are seen as Havens in a Potential World War
Amid escalating international concerns, a new analysis identifies countries best positioned to weather a large-scale global conflict, prioritizing neutrality, isolation, and self-sufficiency.
The recent surge in international tensions, particularly between the United States and Iran, has reignited anxieties surrounding a potential large-scale conflict. While discussions of nuclear war are not widespread, growing apprehension about the geopolitical and humanitarian consequences is prompting individuals to contemplate the safest possible locations should global war become a reality.
A recent report published by the British media outlet, The Daily mail, sought to identify potential shelters from danger, compiling a list of 12 countries considered the safest in a hypothetical world war scenario. The criteria employed centered on factors such as political neutrality, geographical isolation, internal stability, and self-sufficiency.
Did you know?-Switzerland’s neutrality dates back to the Treaty of Vienna in 1815. This long-standing policy is a key factor in its perceived safety during global conflicts.
Chile: A South American Surprise
Among the selections,Chile emerged as a notable surprise,rarely appearing on such lists. The country’s inclusion stems not only from its economic stability and modern infrastructure but also from its strategic location, distant from major global flashpoints.
Indeed, former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson previously highlighted Rapa Nui (Easter Island) as a particularly secure location in the event of nuclear conflict. “If World War is really worried and you want to avoid radioactive rain, this is the ideal place,” he stated years ago, referencing the remote island.
Pro tip: Consider diversifying your emergency preparedness plans. Focusing solely on one location might be limiting. Researching multiple options can provide greater flexibility.
The 12 Safest Countries, Ranked
Hear’s a look at the nations identified as potential havens, and the reasoning behind their inclusion:
- Antarctic: Its extreme remoteness and limited accessibility make it an unlikely target for attack.
- Argentina: Possesses vast natural resources, considerable food reserves, and is geographically removed from primary conflict zones.
- Butane: Maintains an active policy of neutrality and benefits from a mountainous terrain, contributing to its peaceful status.
- Fuggle: Characterized by low military capacity and isolation in the pacific Ocean, presenting a low-risk profile.
- Greenland: Sparsely populated, politically neutral, and considered unattractive as a military objective.
- Iceland: Currently leads the Global Peace Index and boasts strong energy self-sufficiency.
- Indonesia: Promotes a peaceful foreign policy and enjoys a strategic advantage due to its distance from major military powers.
- New Zealand: Its challenging geography and history of neutrality position it as a safe shelter, currently ranking second in the Global peace Ranking.
- South Africa: Offers robust infrastructure, abundant natural resources, and a geographically favorable location.
- Swiss: Has maintained neutrality for nearly two centuries, coupled with established nuclear shelters and advanced emergency preparedness systems.
- Tuvalu: Its small size, limited strategic importance, and low population make it an unlikely target in a war scenario.
Reader question: What factors, beyond those listed, do you think are most notable when considering a safe haven in a global conflict scenario?
A Distant Possibility, But Readiness is Key
While a global war remains a distant possibility, increasing global political uncertainty is driving many to consider protective options. Countries like Chile, due to their unique combination of geography, stability, and limited exposure to conflicts, are increasingly viewed as viable alternatives. This analysis underscores the growing awareness of the need to contemplate contingency plans in an increasingly volatile world.
