The presidency of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), directed by Norma Pineappleyesterday rejected three appeals against the judicial reform, whose constitutional process only lacks its promulgation.
Today, both chambers of the Congress They will proceed to declare the validity of the reform, after the approval of more than 17 legislative powers state of the same, as established by law.
In addition, the ministers unanimously agreed to lift the suspension of work, a measure that will take effect when the changes are published in the Official Journal of the Federation (DOF), but since yesterday the First Chamber has been in session as normal.
For her part, the minister Lenia Batres A proposal was submitted for the SCJN to immediately comply with the judicial reform and begin the transition period, in cases such as the delivery of resources from trusts and the change of the Judiciary to a Disciplinary Court.
Regarding the challenges that President Norma Piña rejected, in one of the Monica Pereda cases, judge of District based in Sinaloa, asked the Supreme Court to exercise its power of attraction and make a pronouncement for the contempt of the Legislature (Chamber of Deputies, Senate and local congresses) to the definitive suspension ordered by the Fifth Court of Morelos.
He pointed out that this opinion acts against judicial independence and the rule of law, which is why the intervention of the Court to speak out on the outrage in which the legislators incurred, since they were prevented from continuing with the process of the judicial reform opinion, but the The Supreme Court decided to dismiss the appeal.
In turn, Judge Jorge Arturo Acosta, as representative of the National Association of Magistrates and Judges, filed another impediment to prohibit the ministers Lenia Batres, Loretta Ortiz and Yasmin Esquivel discuss the issues of judicial reform, because they have shown affinity for its content.
The presidency of the SCJN It was decided that “the impediment raised by the promoters cited in this section is rejected as clearly inadmissible.”
In turn, the staff of the Second Collegiate Court on Labor Matters filed another appeal to ask the Supreme Court to “establish a position in favor of respecting the independence of the Judicial Branch and maintaining the current composition of federal judges.”
Another of their requests is that “the necessary actions be taken to preserve the separation of powers established in the Article 49 of the Constitution and ensure that the system of checks and balances between the Powers of the Union is not eliminated.”
They indicated that the ministers must carry out “concrete actions in defense of the autonomy and independence of the Judiciary based on the international treaties that allow and oblige it to analyze the constitutionality and conventionality of acts such as those that have been undertaken so far and that it intends to implement “judicial reform”.
The requests were rejected by the Supreme Court, Although there is a resource that the Court admitted a week ago to rule on judicial reform, which was assigned to the minister’s report Lenia Batres.
President Norma Piña admitted the appeal of the National Association of Magistrates and Judges which in one of its points requests that “the suspension of the constitutional reform procedure be decreed as a precautionary measure, until such time as the Plenary of this Supreme Court of the Nation rules on the merits.”
The Minister Lenia Batres, The Constitutional Court, which is in charge of preparing the project, does not have a time frame to present it to its peers, while part of the constitutional reform materializes the day after its entry into force, such as the section that marks the beginning of the electoral process for judges, magistrates and ministers.
THEY ASK TO COMPLY WITH THE REFORM
In turn, yesterday Minister Batres proposed that as soon as the judicial reform comes into force, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation and the Federal Judicial Council enter into a transition process.
Following the Court’s decision to lift the suspension and hold a session next Tuesday, the minister proposed starting working groups to provide proposals for the construction of secondary laws, with the aim of guaranteeing the viability of the Judiciary during the process of instrumentation of the reform.
Another of their proposals is that the Judiciary be convened and begin work to take advantage of the material and financial resources, as well as guarantee their transmission to the Disciplinary Court.
He indicated that measures must be adopted to comply with the extinction of trusts and adjustment of salaries so that officials do not earn more than the President. The Transition Board may also receive proposals from judges and magistrates.
For her part, the minister Loretta Ortiz He stated that “by voting against the work stoppage, we ministers have the responsibility and obligation to guarantee the full continuity of the federal justice service in accordance with Article 17 of the Constitution.”
Related
2024-09-16 02:21:12